Hugs Reduce Drugs

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Dec 12, 2013
25,744
3,043
280
Earth
Catchy title that came to mind. Will quote the source of the inspiration below. But I wanted to write a bit about how physical affection demonstratably lowers negative social problems like violence.

US culture is among the most violent on Earth past or present. We've invented nuclear weapons, imprison more of our people than any other nation on Earth or in history, and continue to start wars of conquest in the Middle East while simultaneously doing pretty much everything sociological studies have proven leads to violence, while suppressing everything they've proven leads to peace. From bans on calm-inducing drugs like marijuana while allowing the one that causes aggression and violent outbursts like alcohol, to emphasizing Christian religiousity which encourages physical pleasure denial in the name of saving the soul and whose holy book is filled with calls to being violent in the name of God.

One of the biggest contributors to violence comes from how Christianity (and other religions) discourage premarital sex.

"The percent likelihood of a society being physically violent if it is physically affectionate toward its infants and tolerant of premarital sexual behavior is 2 percent (48/49). The probability of this relationship occurring by chance is 125,000 to one. I am not aware of any other developmental variable that has such a high degree of predictive validity. Thus, we seem to have a firmly based principle: Physically affectionate human societies are highly unlikely to be physically violent."

"These findings overwhelmingly support the thesis that deprivation of body pleasure throughout life—but particularly during the formative periods of infancy, childhood, and adolescence—are very closely related to the amount of warfare and interpersonal violence."

"A questionnaire I developed to explore this question was administered to 96 college students whose average age was 19 years. The results of the questionnaire support the connection between rejection of physical pleasure (and particularly of premarital and extramarital sex) with expression of physical violence. Respondents who reject abortion, responsible premarital sex, and nudity within the family were likely to approve of harsh physical punishment for children and to believe that pain helps build strong moral character. These respondents were likely to find alcohol and drugs more satisfying than sex. The data obtained from the questionnaire provide strong statistical support for the basic inverse relationship between physical violence and physical pleasure. If violence is high, pleasure is low, and conversely, if pleasure is high, violence is low. The questionnaire bears out the theory that the pleasure-violence relationship found in primitive cultures also holds true for a modern industrial nation."

"It is evident that the Judeo-Christian concept of body pleasure is quite the opposite of that outlined by Aristotle, particularly, the relief of body pain and discomfort through somatosensory pleasure. This denial of somatosensory pleasure in Pauline Christian doctrine has led to alternative forms of 'relief' through such painful stimulations as hair-shirts, self-scourgings, self-mutilations, physical violence against others, and in the non-sensory pleasures of drugs.

Experimental animal studies have documented counterparts to these phenomena. For example, animals deprived of somatosensory stimulation will engage in mutilations of their own bodies. Animals deprived of touching early in life develop impaired pain perception and an aversion to being touched by others. They are thus blocked from experiencing the body-pleasure therapy that they need for rehabilitation. In this condition, they have few alternatives but physical violence, where pain-oriented touching and body contact is facilitated by their impaired ability to experience pain. Thus, physical violence and physical pain become therapies of choice for those deprived of physical pleasure. "

all quotes from,
Article Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence

Thus where physical pleasures are lacking, violence is found. Also drug use. Children raised by physically affectionate parents with lots of huggins and touching become non-violent adults, whereas those deprived become violent. Is a table on the link about conservatism too but that's parenthetical. Search/Find for the word'll take you right to it though (it's a sizable page, and it's just the short version.) :)
 
You make some good points. But blaming Pauline Christianity for all the violence in the world is ridiculous.
 
"One of the biggest contributors to violence comes from how Christianity (and other religions) discourage premarital sex."

What baloney. That just demonstrates the author has an ax to grind so needs to toss out everything including the kitchen sink to try to make something stick.
 
You make some good points. But blaming Pauline Christianity for all the violence in the world is ridiculous.

Claiming that's what was said is what's ridiculous. Oppressive religions like Christianity are a contributing factor, but no one proposed it's solely to blame or responsible for all the violence in the world.
 
happiest_facts_6.jpg
 
I don't think we are more violent than the middle east. Also, regarding statistics, they are not always accurate. We know that other countries like to mess with their statistics to make themselves look better. We also know that other countries do not have the money or resources to collect accurate statistics like the United States can. I am certainly NOT buying that the United States is the "most violent" of all the countries. There have also been incredibly violent wars, etc., that had absolutely nothing to do with religion.

A lot of times in the past, religion has been used as an excuse for violence, when it has actually been more about greed and territory.
 
The liberating faith, Christianity, has been a bedrock of prosperity and might in the west. A little affection on top of that is always nice.
 
The liberating faith, Christianity, has been a bedrock of prosperity and might in the west. A little affection on top of that is always nice.

Recall when young going to friends' Methodist services a moment the pastor (or whatever) would pause their sermon and the congregation would all greet one another hugging, shaking hands, etc. Another denomination I've since learned of practices 'holy kisses.' Whether literal or metaphorical, at least some faiths seem to understand the benefits of such things that they've incorporated them into their practices.
 

Forum List

Back
Top