- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,466
- 10,043
- 900
“Unlike some in Washington who want to cut benefits for seniors, I will protect Social Security and Medicare. Period,” the former Fox News host said at the forum organized by sitting Florida Gov. Rick Scott. “These programs are not entitlements they are earned benefits. The government took that money from you involuntarily when you started working – with the promise that you’d get that money back when you retire. For the government to even think about breaking that promise is absolutely ridiculous.”
Mike Huckabee Aims for Seniors with Social Security Pitch in Florida
NOT ONE F...king person WANTS to CUT social security! How dumb!
What an idiot!
A) He is appealing to "seniors" (LIKE ME!!!) with the absolutely stupid "cut benefits for seniors"!
Bu...Crap HUCKSTER!!!!
When SS was started the LIFE span was 65. Extremely few people lived past 65 so that's why the
originators USE 65.... great plan!
Today the average American life span is 75!
NOT ONE person wants to cut existing "seniors" benefits! Idiot!
What MUST be done for the younger generation is to for ALL People under 55 to understand SS will start at age 68 or 69... NOT 65! BUT NOT one person over 55 including existing "seniors" will have benefits cut!
B) What this idiot seems to forget is the younger voters!!!
The vast majority of which seem resigned to the belief THEY will not get any benefits from SS because it will be exhausted...WHICH IS TRUE!!!
SO if the HUCKSTER was smart he would say in very simple terms!
"HEY all you seniors and over 55... NO FEAR NO CUTS!"
"HEY you all under 55 that think SS won't be there???
HERE is a solid plan!
"1) YOU can choose WHERE your deductions go... into a savings account? YUP.
2) If you don't want to choose ...FINE!!! Stays the same!
But in both options the retirement age will be 68!"
Just those two steps A) give people under 55 a choice B) retire at 68 SAVES SS!!!
NOW for the facts regarding that plan:
I am 72 started working when I was 16 and full-time after college 24.
Over the nearly 40+ years my employers and I paid in over $320,000.
If I had had the choice in 1967 when I graduated to direct SS to invest this $320,000
into a 7% yielding investment from 25 to age 45 and then from 46 to 65 @ 5% yield
I would have accumulated $1,421,966! MINE to do with when I retired at 65!
NO risks involved because over 60 years the Dow Jones Industrial average has grown
at least 7% average per year!
Switching from 7% to lesser percent as I got older preserved my accumulation!
BUT Dumb f...ks like HUCKSTER are scaring the wrong people!
Scare the young ones to get the above plan!
Today's SENIORS...AGAIN Dummy Huckster... NOT TOUCHED!
NOT ONE "cut benefits for seniors"
To the under 55 crowd!
"YOU people can all become millionaires ....
IF YOU choose TO"
Mike Huckabee Aims for Seniors with Social Security Pitch in Florida
NOT ONE F...king person WANTS to CUT social security! How dumb!
What an idiot!
A) He is appealing to "seniors" (LIKE ME!!!) with the absolutely stupid "cut benefits for seniors"!
Bu...Crap HUCKSTER!!!!
When SS was started the LIFE span was 65. Extremely few people lived past 65 so that's why the
originators USE 65.... great plan!
Today the average American life span is 75!
NOT ONE person wants to cut existing "seniors" benefits! Idiot!
What MUST be done for the younger generation is to for ALL People under 55 to understand SS will start at age 68 or 69... NOT 65! BUT NOT one person over 55 including existing "seniors" will have benefits cut!
B) What this idiot seems to forget is the younger voters!!!
The vast majority of which seem resigned to the belief THEY will not get any benefits from SS because it will be exhausted...WHICH IS TRUE!!!
SO if the HUCKSTER was smart he would say in very simple terms!
"HEY all you seniors and over 55... NO FEAR NO CUTS!"
"HEY you all under 55 that think SS won't be there???
HERE is a solid plan!
"1) YOU can choose WHERE your deductions go... into a savings account? YUP.
2) If you don't want to choose ...FINE!!! Stays the same!
But in both options the retirement age will be 68!"
Just those two steps A) give people under 55 a choice B) retire at 68 SAVES SS!!!
NOW for the facts regarding that plan:
I am 72 started working when I was 16 and full-time after college 24.
Over the nearly 40+ years my employers and I paid in over $320,000.
If I had had the choice in 1967 when I graduated to direct SS to invest this $320,000
into a 7% yielding investment from 25 to age 45 and then from 46 to 65 @ 5% yield
I would have accumulated $1,421,966! MINE to do with when I retired at 65!
NO risks involved because over 60 years the Dow Jones Industrial average has grown
at least 7% average per year!
Switching from 7% to lesser percent as I got older preserved my accumulation!
BUT Dumb f...ks like HUCKSTER are scaring the wrong people!
Scare the young ones to get the above plan!
Today's SENIORS...AGAIN Dummy Huckster... NOT TOUCHED!
NOT ONE "cut benefits for seniors"
To the under 55 crowd!
"YOU people can all become millionaires ....
IF YOU choose TO"