edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
In typical CON$ervoFascist fashion, when caught lying CON$ just keep on lying. That's indisputable.Don't you deniers realize when you say crap like that you completely discredit yourself?http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~peter/Resources/Seminar/readings/Huang_boreholeTemp_Nature'00.pdf
Huang 2000. Mann has his tree rings and Huang has his boreholes.
In Figure 3 in the report, the boreholes show a steady rise in temperature over the past 500 years, also fully 25% of the boreholes did not show any "net warming over the past five centuries"
OK? About 1 in 4 of the boreholes did not show a rise using the Warmers own methodology and the warming has been occurring since 300 years before the start of the Industrial Age.
Not only does the chart not show a "STEADY RISE" the text in your link says outright, "Almost 80% of the net temperature increase observed has occurred in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries." The chart is nearly flat until the 1700s, the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, and then it rises sharply after the Industrial Revolution to the present. Your post shows how deniers see only what they want to see and therefore no amount of data will ever get them to see the truth.
78% of the global boreholes showed warming, but to a denier that doesn't mean that 78% of the globe was warming, it apparently means the globe overall was not warming.
And 20% of the warming coming before the I R and 80% coming after the I R tells a denier that the I R had nothing to do with the warming.
Figure 3 shows a steady rise on all continents since the 1500's. That is indisputable.