Youwerecreated
VIP Member
- Nov 29, 2010
- 13,273
- 165
- 83
That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.Because changes in a group are driven by reproduction.So do mutations "copying errors" truly bring about these changes or is it that these small changes come from genes that already exist in the gene pool ? example of limits is the cross breeding of a donkey and a horse. If you consider all the species that went extinct infers limits to adapting to an environment.Limited by what? Why? You add up 10,000 tiny changes and you'll potentially have a big change from where you started from, and those small changes just keep on coming, but you say that those small changes stop at some point?Correct,I believe in evolution there is no denying it. But I believe adapting to environments is limited and so is evolution.Evolution is definitely influenced by outside sources, a changing environment which would change diet has been a factor in several changes in species.I have given you the chance to identify the kind of evolution it is you brought up, if it is evolution. How bout better nutrition , would that produce what you claim is evolution ?It evolved/changed/became ... Maybe it's just that I have a looser definition that yours, which only seems to count evolution when something changes into another species. And you'd of course be wrong.So you agree that the natural process of the zygote producing a human is not evolution. You avoid answering the questions,why ?I used to eat meat until my thinking EVOLVED and now I eat a much healthier vegetarian diet. Evolution is about changing over time, small changes that over time add up to significant changes, and nothing is going to go poof and change from a lion into a baboon. We'd need your god for that.This has absolutely nothing to do with the topic single cell and multicellular. If what you state is accurate, what kind of evolution would it be ? What kind of evolution is a single celled organism evolving in to a multicellular organism ?