do you have fossils of the first single celled organism that evolved into a multicelled organism?......
My grandfather teached me that there are no stupid questions.
He was wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
do you have fossils of the first single celled organism that evolved into a multicelled organism?......
Which only serves to reinforce your abysmal ignorance regarding science and your need for the night school classes I instructed you to take.Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
he obviously made a few errors in what he "teached" you......do you have fossils of the first single celled organism that evolved into a multicelled organism?......
My grandfather teached me that there are no stupid questions.
He was wrong.
He learned about capitalization and punctuation.he obviously made a few errors in what he "teached" you......do you have fossils of the first single celled organism that evolved into a multicelled organism?......
My grandfather teached me that there are no stupid questions.
He was wrong.
your antiquated modernist rules are meaningless.......He learned about capitalization and punctuation.he obviously made a few errors in what he "teached" you......do you have fossils of the first single celled organism that evolved into a multicelled organism?......
My grandfather teached me that there are no stupid questions.
He was wrong.
You once again made yourself the model for the village idiot.your antiquated modernist rules are meaningless.......He learned about capitalization and punctuation.he obviously made a few errors in what he "teached" you......do you have fossils of the first single celled organism that evolved into a multicelled organism?......
My grandfather teached me that there are no stupid questions.
He was wrong.
You once again made yourself the model for the village idiot.
actually everyone except the village idiot would have no trouble understanding what I say without following your rules of grammar......are you having trouble understanding?.....You once again made yourself the model for the village idiot.your antiquated modernist rules are meaningless.......He learned about capitalization and punctuation.he obviously made a few errors in what he "teached" you......do you have fossils of the first single celled organism that evolved into a multicelled organism?......
My grandfather teached me that there are no stupid questions.
He was wrong.
Actually, you have a great deal of difficulty stringing words together to form coherent sentences.actually everyone except the village idiot would have no trouble understanding what I say without following your rules of grammar......are you having trouble understanding?.....You once again made yourself the model for the village idiot.your antiquated modernist rules are meaningless.......He learned about capitalization and punctuation.he obviously made a few errors in what he "teached" you......do you have fossils of the first single celled organism that evolved into a multicelled organism?......
My grandfather teached me that there are no stupid questions.
He was wrong.
Oh my, the worst evidence you could have pointed to,to support your belief. Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design. Now let me ask you the same question, What evidence do you have showing that life just poofed itself in to existence without the aid of a designer to oversee the process.evolution is based on fossil evidence. What evidence do you have that a magical being poofed everything into existence?Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
Pop quiz, why was the theory of punctuated equilibrium put forth ?evolution is based on fossil evidence. What evidence do you have that a magical being poofed everything into existence?Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
Oh my, the worst evidence you could have pointed to,to support your belief. Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design. Now let me ask you the same question, What evidence do you have showing that life just poofed itself in to existence without the aid of a designer to oversee the process.evolution is based on fossil evidence. What evidence do you have that a magical being poofed everything into existence?Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design.
The cell and all it's components are not complex in your opinion ,really ? Once again you are basing it off the belief less complex organisms came first.Oh my, the worst evidence you could have pointed to,to support your belief. Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design. Now let me ask you the same question, What evidence do you have showing that life just poofed itself in to existence without the aid of a designer to oversee the process.evolution is based on fossil evidence. What evidence do you have that a magical being poofed everything into existence?Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design.
the complexity of the physiology requires purposeful design that is observable over time with a beginning simplicity to equivalent structural adaptations.
for your purposes (biblical), why is the more complex not found in the earliest recordings of life on Earth - at the same time ?
also why is purposeful design not found in rock formations such as a finished sculpture predating micro organisms.
.
That's just silly. Every good YEC'ist knows that all life magically appeared on the planet 6,000 years ago.The cell and all it's components are not complex in your opinion ,really ? Once again you are basing it off the belief less complex organisms came first.Oh my, the worst evidence you could have pointed to,to support your belief. Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design. Now let me ask you the same question, What evidence do you have showing that life just poofed itself in to existence without the aid of a designer to oversee the process.evolution is based on fossil evidence. What evidence do you have that a magical being poofed everything into existence?Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design.
the complexity of the physiology requires purposeful design that is observable over time with a beginning simplicity to equivalent structural adaptations.
for your purposes (biblical), why is the more complex not found in the earliest recordings of life on Earth - at the same time ?
also why is purposeful design not found in rock formations such as a finished sculpture predating micro organisms.
.
You really are a waste of time. I have stated, I have no Idea how old the earth is but if I were to venture a guess like you and the science community it would be between 6,000 and 15,000 years old.but you know this already from my previous posts.That's just silly. Every good YEC'ist knows that all life magically appeared on the planet 6,000 years ago.The cell and all it's components are not complex in your opinion ,really ? Once again you are basing it off the belief less complex organisms came first.Oh my, the worst evidence you could have pointed to,to support your belief. Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design. Now let me ask you the same question, What evidence do you have showing that life just poofed itself in to existence without the aid of a designer to oversee the process.evolution is based on fossil evidence. What evidence do you have that a magical being poofed everything into existence?Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design.
the complexity of the physiology requires purposeful design that is observable over time with a beginning simplicity to equivalent structural adaptations.
for your purposes (biblical), why is the more complex not found in the earliest recordings of life on Earth - at the same time ?
also why is purposeful design not found in rock formations such as a finished sculpture predating micro organisms.
.
What part of the relevant science community (not to include the irrelevant ID'iot / creation ministry charlatans), puts the age of the planet in your timeline?You really are a waste of time. I have stated, I have no Idea how old the earth is but if I were to venture a guess like you and the science community it would be between 6,000 and 15,000 years old.but you know this already from my previous posts.That's just silly. Every good YEC'ist knows that all life magically appeared on the planet 6,000 years ago.The cell and all it's components are not complex in your opinion ,really ? Once again you are basing it off the belief less complex organisms came first.Oh my, the worst evidence you could have pointed to,to support your belief. Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design. Now let me ask you the same question, What evidence do you have showing that life just poofed itself in to existence without the aid of a designer to oversee the process.evolution is based on fossil evidence. What evidence do you have that a magical being poofed everything into existence?Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design.
the complexity of the physiology requires purposeful design that is observable over time with a beginning simplicity to equivalent structural adaptations.
for your purposes (biblical), why is the more complex not found in the earliest recordings of life on Earth - at the same time ?
also why is purposeful design not found in rock formations such as a finished sculpture predating micro organisms.
.
I can only take so much of your empty rhetoric.
As pointless as your usual drivel.{Hollie has orgasm as she realizes she's finally found a young earther!}.......
The cell and all it's components are not complex in your opinion ,really ? Once again you are basing it off the belief less complex organisms came first.Oh my, the worst evidence you could have pointed to,to support your belief. Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design. Now let me ask you the same question, What evidence do you have showing that life just poofed itself in to existence without the aid of a designer to oversee the process.evolution is based on fossil evidence. What evidence do you have that a magical being poofed everything into existence?Conjecture is what this theory is based on,not evidence.I was watching a show on neanderthals just last week, they made a pretty good case for neanderthals dying out because of climate change and that genetically, they hadn't mated with humans very much. Was very interesting. But whatever.Sure they go extinct or would you like to point out a transitional species from supposed human evolution that is not a chimp and still alive ? We don't know if neanderthals died out because they couldn't adapt or they were consumed by the human population.That is exactly my point. Why are supposed transitional species extinct if they were better adapted ? if they are extinct how did they pass on their traits ?Some changes don't work out and that species dies off, like the Neanderthal's who couldn't adapt to the coming ice age and died out. But changes keep coming constantly to every living organism.
Transitional species evolve, and don't go extinct. Neanderthals weren't a transitional species, they were an offshoot species that died out because they couldn't adapt fast enough to their changing surroundings.
Transitional species evolve and keep going, they don't go extinct. But again, whatever. lol. It's just about how we use a certain word.
Irreducible Complexity and the evidence of purposeful design.
the complexity of the physiology requires purposeful design that is observable over time with a beginning simplicity to equivalent structural adaptations.
for your purposes (biblical), why is the more complex not found in the earliest recordings of life on Earth - at the same time ?
also why is purposeful design not found in rock formations such as a finished sculpture predating micro organisms.
.