The air campaign is not reliant on carrier-based aircraft. I thought you said you were an Air Force vet. Are you not familiar with the AF Bases used in that AO?The de Gaulle had replaced the Roosevelt. Of course. the haters here are ignoring the fact that there are air bases in Turkey and even Iraq that are participating in air strikes.done ...
The Navy announced on Monday the deployment of the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier and its strike group to the Middle East. The Truman will join the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle in the Persian Gulf area and will assist in the war against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).Nov 16, 2015
How many sorties have been flown off of the de Gaulle? How many do you think could be flown off of any US Carrier? You may note that I said could, not would, since Obama won't even send a CAG back to the region.
A CAG should arrive shortly. The Harry S. Truman is close. They just visited Croatia.
Outstanding! Apparently there is no urgency to engage ISIS since a 4 day stay for political reasons in Croatia took precedence over attacking ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Maybe after a few more stops they can launch a few sorties to help contain ISIS. Then again, maybe not.
Of course I am, but the question is how effective are these strikes and why aren't we using Naval air? This is what was testified too in July this year:
7:58 a.m. EDT July 8, 2015
U.S. aircraft are coming back from most combat missions in Iraq without dropping any bombs, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Martin Dempsey said Tuesday.
"At a similar period in the Afghanistan conflict in 2012, the number of aircraft that returned with their ordnance because there were not targets available on the ground was 83 percent," Dempsey told the Senate Armed Services Committee. "It's 65 percent in Iraq right now."
Most combat sorties in Iraq end without striking ISIS