Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #21
the agreement can be waived by the employer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's actually quite possible, and even probable, that the women themselves weren't the leakers. Someone from the NRA that didn't like Cain could have given Politico the information. Someone that wasn't bound by a confidentiality agreement.What a brilliant statement! My God! You should be a lawyer!there are people who worked with both of these people and know about the case.
Other than Cains claim of we paid her off so now she can't speak and insinuating that payoff means he gets to claim the charges are baseless.....we just don't know
She was paid $35k to go away. If she talks, she may have to give back the $35k. That is not too much money and I imagine many will line up to pay the $35k just to hear her side
Cain has to be careful, he is digging a hole that will cave in on him if he is lying
It actually doesn't work like that. You don't take the money and sign an NDA then 20 years later decide you don't want to stick to the agreement, give the money back and make $100k from going on talk shows.
Idiot.
Whether she gives the money back or not, she signed the NDA and that means she cannot talk. Ever. End of. And, FYI, it is unlikely that the agreement is with Cain. It is more likely that the company dealt with it. Not him as an individual.
All we have is 'he says', 'she says'... anyone who sees one side or the other as 'right' is an idiot.
There are no criminal charges that can be filed for violating an NDA. Other than Cain crying..."but you promised not to tell" there is little he can do but seek monetary damages.
Since Cain is the one doing the speaking about it, I even doubt he could sue for that. As soon as Cain claims the charges are frivolous, he is violating the terms and she has a right to defend herself.
Why is it some people do not what both sides of the story told?
The lawyer for one of the accused Cain harrassment suit says Cain violated the confidentiality first...
Hmmmm how did Politico learn of the story??
Supposedly sealed records,etc.....
I don't know and just curious if the rest of you more expert then I in this would know how would Politico get the story and the names?
If this was public record then why the confidentiality agreements?
http://www.timesonline.com/news/loca...d99374672.html
Other than Cains claim of we paid her off so now she can't speak and insinuating that payoff means he gets to claim the charges are baseless.....we just don't know
She was paid $35k to go away. If she talks, she may have to give back the $35k. That is not too much money and I imagine many will line up to pay the $35k just to hear her side
Cain has to be careful, he is digging a hole that will cave in on him if he is lying
It actually doesn't work like that. You don't take the money and sign an NDA then 20 years later decide you don't want to stick to the agreement, give the money back and make $100k from going on talk shows.
Idiot.
Whether she gives the money back or not, she signed the NDA and that means she cannot talk. Ever. End of. And, FYI, it is unlikely that the agreement is with Cain. It is more likely that the company dealt with it. Not him as an individual.
All we have is 'he says', 'she says'... anyone who sees one side or the other as 'right' is an idiot.
Hey thanks for your clarity. As I don't have any legal expertise it appears your comment at the minimum has logic if not legal, appropriateness.
these kind of things get noticed in an office by people who signed NO agreement to be silent
Other than Cains claim of we paid her off so now she can't speak and insinuating that payoff means he gets to claim the charges are baseless.....we just don't know
She was paid $35k to go away. If she talks, she may have to give back the $35k. That is not too much money and I imagine many will line up to pay the $35k just to hear her side
Cain has to be careful, he is digging a hole that will cave in on him if he is lying
It actually doesn't work like that. You don't take the money and sign an NDA then 20 years later decide you don't want to stick to the agreement, give the money back and make $100k from going on talk shows.
Idiot.
Whether she gives the money back or not, she signed the NDA and that means she cannot talk. Ever. End of. And, FYI, it is unlikely that the agreement is with Cain. It is more likely that the company dealt with it. Not him as an individual.
All we have is 'he says', 'she says'... anyone who sees one side or the other as 'right' is an idiot.
There are no criminal charges that can be filed for violating an NDA. Other than Cain crying..."but you promised not to tell" there is little he can do but seek monetary damages.
Since Cain is the one doing the speaking about it, I even doubt he could sue for that. As soon as Cain claims the charges are frivolous, he is violating the terms and she has a right to defend herself.
disputes
Why are you so angry that I answered the OP?
these kind of things get noticed in an office by people who signed NO agreement to be silent
WHAT "kind" of things, dipshit?
YOU, as always, are presuming guilt.
What if the entire set of allegations was horseshit from jump street, you mental midget?
THESE kind of things would get "noticed" by a variety of individuals connected to the complainants, their lawyers/law firms and a number of individuals within the hierarchy of the Association and it's lawyers' firms(s).
It actually doesn't work like that. You don't take the money and sign an NDA then 20 years later decide you don't want to stick to the agreement, give the money back and make $100k from going on talk shows.
Idiot.
Whether she gives the money back or not, she signed the NDA and that means she cannot talk. Ever. End of. And, FYI, it is unlikely that the agreement is with Cain. It is more likely that the company dealt with it. Not him as an individual.
All we have is 'he says', 'she says'... anyone who sees one side or the other as 'right' is an idiot.
There are no criminal charges that can be filed for violating an NDA. Other than Cain crying..."but you promised not to tell" there is little he can do but seek monetary damages.
Since Cain is the one doing the speaking about it, I even doubt he could sue for that. As soon as Cain claims the charges are frivolous, he is violating the terms and she has a right to defend herself.
Did Cain give the story to Politico?
Because that's why I asked how did Politico get the story if someone hadn't violated the confidentiality agreement.
The public news says Politico ADVISED Cain's campaign several weeks ago they were going to run the story... THEY advised FIRST!
So again.. Cain notified them according to you?
these kind of things get noticed in an office by people who signed NO agreement to be silent
WHAT "kind" of things, dipshit?
YOU, as always, are presuming guilt.
What if the entire set of allegations was horseshit from jump street, you mental midget?
THESE kind of things would get "noticed" by a variety of individuals connected to the complainants, their lawyers/law firms and a number of individuals within the hierarchy of the Association and it's lawyers' firms(s).
If you dont think this is anger then you are insane
Other than Cains claim of we paid her off so now she can't speak and insinuating that payoff means he gets to claim the charges are baseless.....we just don't know
She was paid $35k to go away. If she talks, she may have to give back the $35k. That is not too much money and I imagine many will line up to pay the $35k just to hear her side
Cain has to be careful, he is digging a hole that will cave in on him if he is lying
What a brilliant statement! My God! You should be a lawyer!
Why then can Cain talk about them and call them liars?