Ed Schultz Blaming Republicans For Manufacturing Jobs Gone To China. What ??

Oct 10, 2011
1,683
121
0
Naples


:laugh2:

For those of you who have never seen an episode of "The Ed Show" {hopefully we've all seen him by now} Ed dedicates his show to bashing any republican who is a threat to King Obama and accusing Republicans of all our problems.

Last night Ed flew over the cookoo's when his daily poll was "Do You Think That Republicans Caused Millions of Americans To Lose Their Jobs In Manufacturing" {referring to the last 6 to 8 years}.
:ack-1:
He never mentioned anything about China/India during the show.

If he is going to accuse the Republicans of manufacturing jobs gone to the east & take a poll on it, why not take this poll.
Ed Schultz: Let's take this poll: Do you think that the Republicans, Sarah Palin & Rush Limbaugh were the primary reason the Japanese Bombed Pearl Harbor.
:hmpf::wtf:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
and he often has "The Bottom Of The Barrel" Democrats as regular commentators on his program. You will frequently see the likes of Sherrod,Waters and Bernie "The Grinch" Sanders on his show bashing the bajesus out of Republicans. Yet none of his liberal guests have any evidence/facts to back up what they bitch about.
 
I didn't see the show, but it is technically inaccurate to blame "Republicans" exclusively for this mess. Bill Clinton, for example, is not a Republican.

However, it would not be inaccurate to blame conservative economic policies, nor to give Republicans most of the blame. It would only be wrong to give them all of it.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
and why won't Obama give small business any money to keep them afloat? instead he gives billions to Solar Energy Firms who have lost all the billions.
 


:laugh2:

For those of you who have never seen an episode of "The Ed Show" {hopefully we've all seen him by now} Ed dedicates his show to bashing any republican who is a threat to King Obama and accusing Republicans of all our problems.

Last night Ed flew over the cookoo's when his daily poll was "Do You Think That Republicans Caused Millions of Americans To Lose Their Jobs In Manufacturing" {referring to the last 6 to 8 years}.
:ack-1:
He never mentioned anything about China/India during the show.

If he is going to accuse the Republicans of manufacturing jobs gone to the east & take a poll on it, why not take this poll.
Ed Schultz: Let's take this poll: Do you think that the Republicans, Sarah Palin & Rush Limbaugh were the primary reason the Japanese Bombed Pearl Harbor.
:hmpf::wtf:

Well you may be sorta young, but it was Eisenhower that instituted deferred taxation for companies that invested in third world nations. And it was Bush that gave companies a "tax holiday" for "repatriating" profits made overseas. That caused something like 50,000 factories to close up shop here and open in India and China.

Thanks for playing. There are door prizes.

Good job boys!

:clap2:
 
Since their victories in November, Republican governors-elect Scott Walker of Wisconsin and John Kasich of Ohio have made it painfully clear that they want nothing to do with federal high-speed rail money originally designated for their states. Yesterday Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood took them at their word — diverting nearly $1.2 billion in stimulus funds ($810 million from Wisconsin and $385 million from Ohio) to other bullet lines around the country.
DOT Redirects High-Speed Rail Money from Ohio and Wisconsin | INFRASTRUCTURIST

Not exactly true when it comes to states like Ohio, or others for that matter, both parties have a hand in this free for all of jobs being outsourced overseas. Take NAFTA for example, NAFTA was a a proposal by a Republican signed by a Democrat. Every President sinice the first Bush looked the other way while this nation have been bleeding jobs to other nations. So to blame one party specifically for this is simply not true. As for jobs if some of these Gov's out there were more interested in jobs for their states and less interested in sound bites and what the party they represents thinks of them it would not matter , as long as people in their respective states are employed. Until such time as these states, you name the state, decide that the people that live there are a heck of a lot more important than the political party they represent Republican or Democrat shipping jobs offshore will not make one single bit of difference to them. You really want a good example of this, look at each and every one of the 2.4 million manufacuting jobs sent overseas in the last many years and see if there is any collective outrage over this as compared to lets say, Herman Cains settlement/non settlement, or Bill Clintons definition of "is".
 
If the Republicans caused millions of jobs to vanish in the rust belt, then I guess it was soley the republicans who allowed Fanny and Freddie to collapse being they are the ones who gave away homes to the poor, and it will be the republicans who will be responsible for the upcoming record cold winter as well.
 
If the Republicans caused millions of jobs to vanish in the rust belt, then I guess it was soley the republicans who allowed Fanny and Freddie to collapse being they are the ones who gave away homes to the poor, and it will be the republicans who will be responsible for the upcoming record cold winter as well.

You're deflecting in your own thread?

Precious! :lol:
 
Since their victories in November, Republican governors-elect Scott Walker of Wisconsin and John Kasich of Ohio have made it painfully clear that they want nothing to do with federal high-speed rail money originally designated for their states. Yesterday Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood took them at their word — diverting nearly $1.2 billion in stimulus funds ($810 million from Wisconsin and $385 million from Ohio) to other bullet lines around the country.
DOT Redirects High-Speed Rail Money from Ohio and Wisconsin | INFRASTRUCTURIST

Not exactly true when it comes to states like Ohio, or others for that matter, both parties have a hand in this free for all of jobs being outsourced overseas. Take NAFTA for example, NAFTA was a a proposal by a Republican signed by a Democrat. Every President sinice the first Bush looked the other way while this nation have been bleeding jobs to other nations. So to blame one party specifically for this is simply not true. As for jobs if some of these Gov's out there were more interested in jobs for their states and less interested in sound bites and what the party they represents thinks of them it would not matter , as long as people in their respective states are employed. Until such time as these states, you name the state, decide that the people that live there are a heck of a lot more important than the political party they represent Republican or Democrat shipping jobs offshore will not make one single bit of difference to them. You really want a good example of this, look at each and every one of the 2.4 million manufacuting jobs sent overseas in the last many years and see if there is any collective outrage over this as compared to lets say, Herman Cains settlement/non settlement, or Bill Clintons definition of "is".

Clinton's version of the bill came with provisions to help people displaced by it.
 
Since their victories in November, Republican governors-elect Scott Walker of Wisconsin and John Kasich of Ohio have made it painfully clear that they want nothing to do with federal high-speed rail money originally designated for their states. Yesterday Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood took them at their word — diverting nearly $1.2 billion in stimulus funds ($810 million from Wisconsin and $385 million from Ohio) to other bullet lines around the country.
DOT Redirects High-Speed Rail Money from Ohio and Wisconsin | INFRASTRUCTURIST

Not exactly true when it comes to states like Ohio, or others for that matter, both parties have a hand in this free for all of jobs being outsourced overseas. Take NAFTA for example, NAFTA was a a proposal by a Republican signed by a Democrat. Every President sinice the first Bush looked the other way while this nation have been bleeding jobs to other nations. So to blame one party specifically for this is simply not true. As for jobs if some of these Gov's out there were more interested in jobs for their states and less interested in sound bites and what the party they represents thinks of them it would not matter , as long as people in their respective states are employed. Until such time as these states, you name the state, decide that the people that live there are a heck of a lot more important than the political party they represent Republican or Democrat shipping jobs offshore will not make one single bit of difference to them. You really want a good example of this, look at each and every one of the 2.4 million manufacuting jobs sent overseas in the last many years and see if there is any collective outrage over this as compared to lets say, Herman Cains settlement/non settlement, or Bill Clintons definition of "is".

Clinton's version of the bill came with provisions to help people displaced by it.

True enough but would you say that NAFTA has been a good thing for American Industry? Again, my post does not lay the blame just at Clinton's feet, a lot can said for those companies who's motivation is nothing but profit and yet dane to call themselves American. I submit that at some point a company has to recognize that the nation in which they do business and seek to take advantage of, i.e. it's transportation system, it's tax law's, it's banking system, etc. and yes even the blood of the citizens that keep it safe. does and should have some sense of obligation to that country in which it does business in. Laws that promote outsourcing no matter who the party is just gives thos companies in my mind who have no pride in this nation incentive to take advantage which they more often than not do, and these days are encouraged to do, by the people they pay which are those that are supposed to represent us.
 
Don't catch his TV gig very often but blaming Republicans for jobs to China and just about everything else has been his radio show mantra for a long long time.

His best at MSNBC though is when he's serving a suspension, as he had to recently for calling Laura Ingraham a right-wing slut...a talk slut. Class guy, big Eddie.
 
whats the point of high speed rail when small business have been shutting down since 2008? in other words,,,high speed rails to nowhere. and we don't have enough money to pay for them. someone needs to do the math of the costs,,,,PER MILE !!! and Obama thought 9 billion was enough to get the project started here in Florida !!! Derrr,,,doesn't O'Bozo know that Florida sits on Sink Holes/Soft Ground??...... I live here and have heard about plenty of homes and roads sinking into the sandy hells of Florida. I can just see a news story in 2020,,,,this just in,,,a 3 mile stretch of the Obama High Speed Rail is slowly sinking into the earth at a rate of two inches a year.......Geologists say there is nothing we can do about it,,,just watch 20 billion dollars go down the drain.
 
I didn't see the show, but it is technically inaccurate to blame "Republicans" exclusively for this mess. Bill Clinton, for example, is not a Republican.

However, it would not be inaccurate to blame conservative economic policies, nor to give Republicans most of the blame. It would only be wrong to give them all of it.

I remember a few weeks back when Ed was talking to Sherrod and Waters at the same time over the Jobs bill. It was like Adolf Hilter asking opinions of Mow Tse Wong and Castro,,,,lol.
 
Since their victories in November, Republican governors-elect Scott Walker of Wisconsin and John Kasich of Ohio have made it painfully clear that they want nothing to do with federal high-speed rail money originally designated for their states. Yesterday Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood took them at their word — diverting nearly $1.2 billion in stimulus funds ($810 million from Wisconsin and $385 million from Ohio) to other bullet lines around the country.
DOT Redirects High-Speed Rail Money from Ohio and Wisconsin | INFRASTRUCTURIST

Not exactly true when it comes to states like Ohio, or others for that matter, both parties have a hand in this free for all of jobs being outsourced overseas. Take NAFTA for example, NAFTA was a a proposal by a Republican signed by a Democrat. Every President sinice the first Bush looked the other way while this nation have been bleeding jobs to other nations. So to blame one party specifically for this is simply not true. As for jobs if some of these Gov's out there were more interested in jobs for their states and less interested in sound bites and what the party they represents thinks of them it would not matter , as long as people in their respective states are employed. Until such time as these states, you name the state, decide that the people that live there are a heck of a lot more important than the political party they represent Republican or Democrat shipping jobs offshore will not make one single bit of difference to them. You really want a good example of this, look at each and every one of the 2.4 million manufacuting jobs sent overseas in the last many years and see if there is any collective outrage over this as compared to lets say, Herman Cains settlement/non settlement, or Bill Clintons definition of "is".

Clinton's version of the bill came with provisions to help people displaced by it.

True enough but would you say that NAFTA has been a good thing for American Industry? Again, my post does not lay the blame just at Clinton's feet, a lot can said for those companies who's motivation is nothing but profit and yet dane to call themselves American. I submit that at some point a company has to recognize that the nation in which they do business and seek to take advantage of, i.e. it's transportation system, it's tax law's, it's banking system, etc. and yes even the blood of the citizens that keep it safe. does and should have some sense of obligation to that country in which it does business in. Laws that promote outsourcing no matter who the party is just gives thos companies in my mind who have no pride in this nation incentive to take advantage which they more often than not do, and these days are encouraged to do, by the people they pay which are those that are supposed to represent us.

Do I think it helped? Sure. Proof is in the pudding. Many jobs were created. The problem here is that there are many that think the economy is some stagnant construct. It's not. It's extremely fluid. What worked at one point, may need to be altered because it is simply not good any more. It looks as if to much work has been outsourced and that needs to be addressed. That may not be the case a year from now..
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top