How can lay people agree with scientists on AGM??

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Odd, that lay people must buy into scientist's conclusions, if we are to combat climate change, when they cant begin to understand the science themselves. Thus scientists must present a sometimes false cartoon version for lay people to understand, but doing so makes smart lay people assume they are being conned.

Scientists goofed big time with the cartoon version because they lost our trust! And of course it does not help that they fire or drive out scientists who disagree with them perhaps because they are bad scientists or perhaps to make it easier to perpetuate the hoax

 

[ScienceRocks]

If the lay people don't have enough understanding then how can they think they're right and the scientist are all wrong? lol

Africans or some other tribal cultural dont' like science but that isn't the west...That is what makes the west better....Attack science = you're attacking the west.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

If the lay people don't have enough understanding then how can they think they're right and the scientist are all wrong? lol

scientists can lie to us about the AGW science but they cant always lie to us about conclusions. For example, they say weather is getting worse when all we have to do is ask Warren Buffet if he is paying out more or less for weather damage through his insurance companies. Or we can look up Global Cyclonic Index and see for ourselves. Do you understand?

 

[Dale Smith]

If the lay people don't have enough understanding then how can they think they're right and the scientist are all wrong? lol

Africans or some other tribal cultural dont' like science but that isn't the west...That is what makes the west better....Attack science = you're attacking the west.

How can you accurately claim what the temperature is when the stratospheric aerosol injection spraying program of nano-particulates of heavy metals like barium, strontium and aluminum is not figured into the equation and this program has been going on in earnest in every NATO country since 1997??????

 

[flacaltenn]

Odd, that lay people must buy into scientist's conclusions, if we are to combat climate change, when they cant begin to understand the science themselves. Thus scientists must present a sometimes false cartoon version for lay people to understand, but doing so makes smart lay people assume they are being conned.

Scientists goofed big time with the cartoon version because they lost our trust! And of course it does not help that they fire or drive out scientists who disagree with them perhaps because they are bad scientists or perhaps to make it easier to perpetuate the hoax

It's not so much that the scientists goofed up and oversimplified and over sensationalized the scenarios. It was a HANDFUL of activists feeding the media the "worst case scenarios" knowing that it would constantly make headlines. The MAJORITY of scientists kept their heads down and probably were concerned how the projections were presented to the public.

It was the MEDIA and politicians from all over the freaking globe that misrepresented the predictions and the science on purpose. And a FEW key scientists gave them cover to do it...

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. It was a HANDFUL of activists feeding the media the "worst case scenarios" knowing that it would constantly make headlines. The MAJORITY of scientists kept their heads down ..

Jim Hanson said half of NYC would be under water by now etc etc. no scientists called him out on the lie so now they are all implicated for keeping their heads down and doing everything possible to secure more grant money!!!

 

[Muhammed]