Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Uhmmm... they are public lands. Big brother being a member of the public.. the answer is big brother is the people the people are the public... the lands managed by the public's employees. Funny, though, how some of our employees britches have grown a bit to big. Time to give them a spanking.
Yeah, i've always gotten a kick out of Big Brother's "It's a privilege for you to drive on my roads." Who's roads are they? And why should we grovel and give thanks to Big Brother for allowing us to drive on our own roads? I never got that one.
God complex by our employees. Unfortunately, many of the public treat our employ like they are gods.
sad how the Fascists here think its ok to stop and search someone without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
they burn the Constitution in their heads, nightly.
What a little bitch. First as always when Libertarians quote the law they are dead WRONG. Ever heard of United States vs Ramsey? Of course you didn't because you only believe in laws when they suit your Radical Paul agenda! This case law created JUSTIFIABLY created the Border Search Exception Doctrine. It allows for searches and seizures without a warrant or probable cause at all out international borders and ports. The border patrol agent was well within his right to detain, arrest and search the car. Heck he could have given her a cavity search if he desired!
Google Scholar
Second, even without the BSE doctrine, he had probable cause due to her defensiveness and confrontational nature (yet that is a catch 22).
Third, do you realize how hard of a job these people have? Do you realize how many dangerous objects and people pass through the border. You come through the border, you should realize there is a raised suspicion. Many cartel and terrorist leaders seek pretty white bitches like that to seek drugs and other items across the border. They try to stop what they do and that is why their is a raised suspicious. Heck there could be an interloper in their car that they don't know about (some insect like the asian beatle) that could be detected.
I think they should have arrested her for disorderly conduct and prosecuted her as an example!
LASTLY, if you are going to say well case law is bad law and I don't like since it's not in the constitution! Then you have ZERO argument for our fundmental right to privacy. The right to privacy is NOT in the constitution and was created by CASE LAW. See Griswald v. Connecticut (strengthened by Roe vs Wade).
You are an ignorant FOS POS jerk. That girl was someone's daughter, not a "white bitch" for you to jack boot and rape with your night stick.What a little bitch. First as always when Libertarians quote the law they are dead WRONG. Ever heard of United States vs Ramsey? Of course you didn't because you only believe in laws when they suit your Radical Paul agenda! This case law created JUSTIFIABLY created the Border Search Exception Doctrine. It allows for searches and seizures without a warrant or probable cause at all out international borders and ports. The border patrol agent was well within his right to detain, arrest and search the car. Heck he could have given her a cavity search if he desired!
Google Scholar
Second, even without the BSE doctrine, he had probable cause due to her defensiveness and confrontational nature (yet that is a catch 22).
Third, do you realize how hard of a job these people have? Do you realize how many dangerous objects and people pass through the border. You come through the border, you should realize there is a raised suspicion. Many cartel and terrorist leaders seek pretty white bitches like that to seek drugs and other items across the border. They try to stop what they do and that is why their is a raised suspicious. Heck there could be an interloper in their car that they don't know about (some insect like the asian beatle) that could be detected.
I think they should have arrested her for disorderly conduct and prosecuted her as an example!
LASTLY, if you are going to say well case law is bad law and I don't like since it's not in the constitution! Then you have ZERO argument for our fundmental right to privacy. The right to privacy is NOT in the constitution and was created by CASE LAW. See Griswald v. Connecticut (strengthened by Roe vs Wade).
Hate to date that bitch
"You have no RIGHT to ask me to take off my panties!"
Hate to date that bitch
"You have no RIGHT to ask me to take off my panties!"
Now you're just getting creepy. Good time for you to tuck tale and slink away from the thread. Bye.
Hate to date that bitch
"You have no RIGHT to ask me to take off my panties!"
Now you're just getting creepy. Good time for you to tuck tale and slink away from the thread. Bye.
She was just lucky she was good looking
If she was an ugly skank, she would be on the twitching end of a taser
I would have arrested her on the spot. ON THE SPOT.
I would have arrested her on the spot. ON THE SPOT.
For what reason?
That what it all boils down to.
The Officer is always right, even if he is wrong and you must show some respect.
I believe the SS worked the same way.
She should have made a citizen's arrest for the illegal detainment of a US citizen....
she wasn't detained.
