Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
However....you have failed to tell me how two dudes bumping uglies or two chicks chowing box are violating your rights.
The Bass has never said two faggots having sex is violating his rights, what the Bass said was that two gays marrying violates the sacrament of marriage, marriage is a sacred act whereby a man leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife and the two become one flesh. To change this sacred act by bending to the will and pressure of militant gay activists and their far left leaning co-conspirators is defilement. This is the main reason why militant faggot activists mostly target churches and religious people and their harrassment interferes with people's freedom of religion
That is your religious based interpretation of what ""Marriage" is. To me....marriage means...."two joined to become one" plus whatever agreement they have set up as far as vows and such.
The fact is.....you hate gays. And because of that....you dont want them around....at all.
For every group...there are acttivists.
I am a 2nd amendment activist......not all gun owners are though. There are gay activists too....not all gays are "Militant" activists.
Like I've said before.....if gays want to have freedom to do what they please....they should de-politicize marriage....that should be there goal.
In fact....the more things we de-politicize...the more freedoms all of us will have. But that will sadly not occur....because to many rely on there Nanny government to help them...and the government will always fail them...always.
I am also 100% for the 2nd Amendment.
But last time I looked, there wasn't a Faggot Amendment
I support gays having massive, random, unprotected, homo sex.
The faster they spread their infections and diseases.
The sooner the sodomite problem will disappear.
Didn't see the words; faggot, sodomite, gay, queer, lesbian, fudge packer, homo, or pervert, anywhere in the 14th Amendment.I am also 100% for the 2nd Amendment.
But last time I looked, there wasn't a Faggot Amendment
How bout section 1 of the 14th amendment???
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The Bass has never said two faggots having sex is violating his rights, what the Bass said was that two gays marrying violates the sacrament of marriage, marriage is a sacred act whereby a man leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife and the two become one flesh. To change this sacred act by bending to the will and pressure of militant gay activists and their far left leaning co-conspirators is defilement. This is the main reason why militant faggot activists mostly target churches and religious people and their harrassment interferes with people's freedom of religion
That is your religious based interpretation of what ""Marriage" is. To me....marriage means...."two joined to become one" plus whatever agreement they have set up as far as vows and such.
The fact is.....you hate gays. And because of that....you dont want them around....at all.
For every group...there are acttivists.
I am a 2nd amendment activist......not all gun owners are though. There are gay activists too....not all gays are "Militant" activists.
Like I've said before.....if gays want to have freedom to do what they please....they should de-politicize marriage....that should be there goal.
In fact....the more things we de-politicize...the more freedoms all of us will have. But that will sadly not occur....because to many rely on there Nanny government to help them...and the government will always fail them...always.
They would de-politicize it if it was about freedom.
But it isn't. It's about repression of the majority by a minority, and that's why they keep it political.
Didn't see the words; faggot, sodomite, gay, queer, lesbian, fudge packer, homo, or pervert, anywhere in the 14th Amendment.I am also 100% for the 2nd Amendment.
But last time I looked, there wasn't a Faggot Amendment
How bout section 1 of the 14th amendment???
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
But these sick faggots already get due process and equal protection of the laws, just like everone else.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside".
That is the only sentence where "All" applies or is mentioned.
The Bass has never said two faggots having sex is violating his rights, what the Bass said was that two gays marrying violates the sacrament of marriage, marriage is a sacred act whereby a man leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife and the two become one flesh. To change this sacred act by bending to the will and pressure of militant gay activists and their far left leaning co-conspirators is defilement. This is the main reason why militant faggot activists mostly target churches and religious people and their harrassment interferes with people's freedom of religion
Basically you wish to deem gays as sub-human.....and that is quite Nazi-esque of you.
Once again,
The word "All" only applied to the issues presented in that one sentence.
Not the whole paragraph.
"All" persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside".
Basically you wish to deem gays as sub-human.....and that is quite Nazi-esque of you.
Although faggots are genetically humans.
Their lifestyle and sexual proclivities are sub-human.
Didn't see the words; faggot, sodomite, gay, queer, lesbian, fudge packer, homo, or pervert, anywhere in the 14th Amendment.I am also 100% for the 2nd Amendment.
But last time I looked, there wasn't a Faggot Amendment
How bout section 1 of the 14th amendment???
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
But these sick faggots already get due process and equal protection of the laws, just like everone else.
Basically you wish to deem gays as sub-human.....and that is quite Nazi-esque of you.
Although faggots are genetically humans.
Their lifestyle and sexual proclivities are sub-human.
Where as you are genetically sub-human and your lifestyle and opinions rival Satan.