Hillary upset the press focused on her criminal actions rather then who gave the information..

[westwall]

This thread is meant to deflect from minority presidential-elect Trump's request for Putin to hack into his opponent's emails in order to give him an advantage.

Except that Trump never requested Putin to hack into anyone's e-mail. You're being dishonest.

Keep denying what we all know to be a fact that Trump publicly asked the Russians to hack into his opponent's emails and you might persuade yourself that it is not true.

It was a private server thus it can't be espionage, dumbshit.

Do not expect to hear from me again. Oddly enough, I do not have time for anyone who calls me names.

Don't let the door hit you where the Sun don't shine!

 

[Wyatt earp]

"I hope you're able to find" the 30,000 emails that she deleted from the server she used for ifficial cowithout any oversight? That's your big outrage? I think a lot of people would like to know what she wanted to hide from her days as Sec State.

You do not consider it treason for a presidential candidate to call on the Russians to hack his opponent's emails?
I give up!

Apply a little logic here. Hillary claimed the 30,000 emails contained no official correspondence. Therefore, we're talking about private emails, so there's no treason involved. The only way there could be treason is if she lied and deleted sensitive information. Which one do you want to hold on to:

1. These are only personal emails and Trump was just being a jerk and your "treason" goes out the window.
2. There was sensitive information that she deleted in order to hide from Congress, then lied about.

Please, pick one.

"... Trump was just being a jerk ..."
I'll buy that but stupidity cannot be a defense for treason.

I agree. So why did the FBI let the shrilary off? There's no provision in the statutes that she violated that pertain to intent.

I cannot speak for the FBI but I do know that its head, when he got the emails stolen by the Russians tried to sully Hillary Clinton with suspicion of wrong-doing only to change his mind when the damage was done. He deserves a "Friendship of Russia" decoration from Putin.

My do we have amnesia?


This was over a year long criminal investigation by the F.B.I. into Hillary Clinton.

Around August he concluded that Hillary was guilty but showed no intent because she played a bumbling snobish fool.


Which you apllauded on the left

The F.B.I. around October got a hold of Wieners emails and said Hillary is not off yet..

I Bear513 publicly stated on social media that I hoped Russia would find and release Hillary's 30,000 emails and so did Trump.. So in your fantasy world against the 1st amendment would I be also charged with treason?


..

 

[Wyatt earp]

Liberal logic 101, when caught play the victim...




Obama Says Clinton Was Not 'Treated Fairly' During Election

• By MARYALICE PARKS

Dec 16, 2016,
President Obama said today that he did not think Hillary Clinton was “treated fairly” during the presidential election.

Obama was asked specifically during a news conference whether his former secretary of state lost because of Russia’s reported hacking of the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign computer servers. The president pivoted on that question, and instead lobbed a critique of the media. He said he found the coverage of Clinton “troubling.”

“I think she's worked tirelessly on behalf of the American people and I don't think she was treated fairly during the election, I think the coverage of her -- and the issues -- was troubling,” he said.

Clinton and her campaign in recent days have also expressed disappointment with news outlets' focus on her private email server during the campaign over Russia’s involvement in the data breaches. Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta, called the coverage of the Russia story “lackadaisical,” and Clinton last night reportedly told donors in New York that she was glad the press was catching onto the issue.


.

I don't know what worse a crime there would be than TREASON against the United States--collusion with a foreign adversary--(Russia to do a Cyber Attack on the United States in order to win an election.) Treason is punishable by life sentence in a Federal prison.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/world/europe/trump-campaign-russia.html

You can take your 3 suspect emails out of thousands--with a small c on them (meaning call back) and run with it all you want too--LOL

I think Hillary Clinton is probably enjoying every second of this--LOL Every major news network is reporting on this. It's now about Donald Trump. The first time ever that a Republican senate intelligence committee put the pressure on a sitting Democrat President to issue an executive order on Russia's involvement with getting a cough cough Republican President elect---(elected.) Hysterical.

Which one are you going with, that there were only personal emails and thus no treason, or she deleted sensitive information to keep it from Congress and lied about it?

The DNC is a government operated database--and that's where these leaks were coming from. In the United States it is a FELONY to hack into any private or public database, that comes with PRISON time. It is the equivalent of someone going to your mail box and opening your mail. They are not there to see what bills and letters you're getting, they're there to do harm to you.

For someone to risk getting caught, there will ALWAYS be a REWARD for doing it. While you were all cheering on these wikileaks--that were coming from Russia, you conveniently forgot that wikileaks, also with love from Russia attacked G.W. Bush in the latter part of his term, releasing sensitive information regarding the Iraq war. Only then it was the left that was cheering them on.

No it isn't. The DNC is a PRIVATE CORPORATION. Where do you people come from?

Is it just me Westwall or are these kids just making more and more stuff up lately thinking they won't get called on it?



.

 

[Eloy]

You do not consider it treason for a presidential candidate to call on the Russians to hack his opponent's emails?
I give up!

Apply a little logic here. Hillary claimed the 30,000 emails contained no official correspondence. Therefore, we're talking about private emails, so there's no treason involved. The only way there could be treason is if she lied and deleted sensitive information. Which one do you want to hold on to:

1. These are only personal emails and Trump was just being a jerk and your "treason" goes out the window.
2. There was sensitive information that she deleted in order to hide from Congress, then lied about.

Please, pick one.

"... Trump was just being a jerk ..."
I'll buy that but stupidity cannot be a defense for treason.

I agree. So why did the FBI let the shrilary off? There's no provision in the statutes that she violated that pertain to intent.

I cannot speak for the FBI but I do know that its head, when he got the emails stolen by the Russians tried to sully Hillary Clinton with suspicion of wrong-doing only to change his mind when the damage was done. He deserves a "Friendship of Russia" decoration from Putin.

My do we have amnesia?


This was over a year long criminal investigation by the F.B.I. into Hillary Clinton.

Around August he concluded that Hillary was guilty but showed no intent because she played a bumbling snobish fool.


Which you apllauded on the left

The F.B.I. around October got a hold of Wieners emails and said Hillary is not off yet..

I Bear513 publicly stated on social media that I hoped Russia would find and release Hillary's 30,000 emails and so did Trump.. So in your fantasy world against the 1st amendment would I be also charged with treason?..

I cannot express an opinion about your guilt or innocence.

 

[hunarcy]

This thread is meant to deflect from minority presidential-elect Trump's request for Putin to hack into his opponent's emails in order to give him an advantage.

Except that Trump never requested Putin to hack into anyone's e-mail. You're being dishonest.

Keep denying what we all know to be a fact that Trump publicly asked the Russians to hack into his opponent's emails and you might persuade yourself that it is not true.

You sir are a liar.

 

[hunarcy]

This thread is meant to deflect from minority presidential-elect Trump's request for Putin to hack into his opponent's emails in order to give him an advantage.

Except that Trump never requested Putin to hack into anyone's e-mail. You're being dishonest.

Keep denying what we all know to be a fact that Trump publicly asked the Russians to hack into his opponent's emails and you might persuade yourself that it is not true.

It was a private server thus it can't be espionage, dumbshit.

Do not expect to hear from me again. Oddly enough, I do not have time for anyone who calls me names.

We'd all be better served if you would not post again. I'd rather listen to someone I disagree with than someone who lies.

 

[hadit]

Can you supply a quote for examination? Because I think you're just regurgitating nonsense. If you look at what Trump actually said instead of what you wish he said, you would arrive at a different conclusion.

Yes, earlier in this thread I posted part of Trump's speech where he expressed his hope that the Russians would hack into his opponent's emails. Most people have seen it more than once.

"I hope you're able to find" the 30,000 emails that she deleted from the server she used for ifficial cowithout any oversight? That's your big outrage? I think a lot of people would like to know what she wanted to hide from her days as Sec State.

You do not consider it treason for a presidential candidate to call on the Russians to hack his opponent's emails?
I give up!

Apply a little logic here. Hillary claimed the 30,000 emails contained no official correspondence. Therefore, we're talking about private emails, so there's no treason involved. The only way there could be treason is if she lied and deleted sensitive information. Which one do you want to hold on to:

1. These are only personal emails and Trump was just being a jerk and your "treason" goes out the window.
2. There was sensitive information that she deleted in order to hide from Congress, then lied about.

Please, pick one.

"... Trump was just being a jerk ..."
I'll buy that but stupidity cannot be a defense for treason.

So prove treason. I note that you did not pick one of the options. Why is that?

Based on your continued use of the term "treason", I can only conclude that you believe Hillary deleted sensitive material to hide it from Congress and lied about it.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Apply a little logic here. Hillary claimed the 30,000 emails contained no official correspondence. Therefore, we're talking about private emails, so there's no treason involved. The only way there could be treason is if she lied and deleted sensitive information. Which one do you want to hold on to:

1. These are only personal emails and Trump was just being a jerk and your "treason" goes out the window.
2. There was sensitive information that she deleted in order to hide from Congress, then lied about.

Please, pick one.

"... Trump was just being a jerk ..."
I'll buy that but stupidity cannot be a defense for treason.

I agree. So why did the FBI let the shrilary off? There's no provision in the statutes that she violated that pertain to intent.

I cannot speak for the FBI but I do know that its head, when he got the emails stolen by the Russians tried to sully Hillary Clinton with suspicion of wrong-doing only to change his mind when the damage was done. He deserves a "Friendship of Russia" decoration from Putin.

My do we have amnesia?


This was over a year long criminal investigation by the F.B.I. into Hillary Clinton.

Around August he concluded that Hillary was guilty but showed no intent because she played a bumbling snobish fool.


Which you apllauded on the left

The F.B.I. around October got a hold of Wieners emails and said Hillary is not off yet..

I Bear513 publicly stated on social media that I hoped Russia would find and release Hillary's 30,000 emails and so did Trump.. So in your fantasy world against the 1st amendment would I be also charged with treason?..

I cannot express an opinion about your guilt or innocence.

So you can express one about trump? I did the same thing over and over on social media...


.

 

[Eloy]

"... Trump was just being a jerk ..."
I'll buy that but stupidity cannot be a defense for treason.

I agree. So why did the FBI let the shrilary off? There's no provision in the statutes that she violated that pertain to intent.

I cannot speak for the FBI but I do know that its head, when he got the emails stolen by the Russians tried to sully Hillary Clinton with suspicion of wrong-doing only to change his mind when the damage was done. He deserves a "Friendship of Russia" decoration from Putin.

My do we have amnesia?


This was over a year long criminal investigation by the F.B.I. into Hillary Clinton.

Around August he concluded that Hillary was guilty but showed no intent because she played a bumbling snobish fool.


Which you apllauded on the left

The F.B.I. around October got a hold of Wieners emails and said Hillary is not off yet..

I Bear513 publicly stated on social media that I hoped Russia would find and release Hillary's 30,000 emails and so did Trump.. So in your fantasy world against the 1st amendment would I be also charged with treason?..

I cannot express an opinion about your guilt or innocence.

So you can express one about trump? I did the same thing over and over on social media...


.

People all over the world are watching Trump and reading his every tweet. The man is an embarrassment.