Hillary says NRA needs a "rival" organization of responsible gun owners

[Uncensored2008]

[

Look "lil Einstein" no one is calling for a repeal of the 2nd amendment.

I may view you Stalinists as nobodies, but you are indeed seeking to crush all civil rights, particularly the 1st and 2nd Amendments, but the hatred you Maoists have for the rest of the Constitution is palpable as well.

What we're saying is that semi-automatic weapons need to be banned.

Yes, along with all other guns.

That you are lying is simply standard operating procedure for you of the Khmer Rouge, The problem you have is everyone knows that you're lying.

{
In other words, the proposals aren’t just difficult to enact in the current political climate; their practical effects would also be quite limited. On occasion, though, leading Democrats will make oblique reference to a more sweeping policy change: seizing a huge number of weapons from law-abiding citizens.

At a New Hampshire forum in the fall of 2015, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton spoke approvingly of an Australian gun buyback program that collected more than 650,000 weapons — a buyback that, she neglected to mention, was compulsory.}

Boston Globe: It's Time To Consider Gun Confiscation

There is no use for them other than to kill people in mass. We have to have extended background checks, including mental illness. We need to close the loopholes at gun shows, stop private sales from neighbor to neighbor, and everything is sold, bought & resold through licensed gun dealers. That people who are on a no fly list or terrorist watch list shouldn't be able to walk into a gun store and load up.

9 out of 10 GUN OWNERS want this done, the ONLY people that don't want it are ones that couldn't pass an extended background check. (probably you)
90 percent of Americans want expanded background checks on guns. Why isn’t this a political slam dunk?

You Stalinists also claim that words you object to have no purpose, hence you have the right to ban them.

If you ever got the power to enact the evil you seek, you would only succeed in spawning a shooting war, a war you are destined to lose.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The first amendment was specifically for the press to be able expose the wrong doing of our leaders. Of course, Trump-0 and his followers have a problem with that.

Naturally you have never read the document you fight so hard to destroy.

The First Amendment acknowledges first and foremost the right of a free people to speak. This is something you Maoists seek to crush. Your Gestapo terrorists known as ANTIFA violently attack those who dare speak against your totalitarian party. You pass laws against people speaking words and ideas that your filthy party fears. You destroy art and history that threatens the fiction your dystopian nightmare of a party spreads as the manure for the dictatorship you seek to grow in.

Then we see secondly a free press. No one has suggested that the press be silenced; except you Stalinists that is - such as the war you wage against Hannity in you effort to silence voices that oppose the evil you promote.

Media Matters Using Roy Moore Allegations To Go After Hannity’s Advertisers

The First Amendment also protects the right of assembly, which again is under attack by you fascist thugs with the "safe zones" where white people are prohibited from and other racist impediments to free association.

And of course you openly wage war of the right of people to follow the faith of their own convictions. Beyond just the "bake the cake peasant" demands of the evil left, we have the religious litmus tests of Feinstein and other Communists in direct violation of our Constitution. You Marxists demand that Catholics be prohibited from public office due to their religion.

The Constitution on you Communists is like salt on slugs.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Who told you all that crap? I'll be happy to explain why it's all wrong, but just one subject at a time. No need trying to muddle and misdirect the discussion by jumping from one subject to the next like Hannity does.
Lets start with your silly claim that the left (not Marxists or followers of Mao) want to ban Catholics from public office.

Who told me all that "crap" Comrade? It is the 1st Amendment.

And no Comrade, it is not "wrong." You seek to perpetrate evil, you seek to crush all civil rights and establish a dictatorship that you believe will benefit you.

As far as you Marxists banning Catholics from public office, that ship has sailed.

That you are utterly and completely dishonest is simply part of you being a Stalinist.

{
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), expressed grave concerns that Barrett is a Catholic in good standing.

"When you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you, and that's of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for, for years in this country," Feinstein said.

It was an "Are you now or have you ever been a Catholic" moment - and it was completely disgraceful. }

{
Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) accused Barrett of being unfit for the bench because of her ties to Alliance Defending Freedom - an organization he called a "hate" group.

Barrett had once delivered a speech at the renowned law firm that specializes in defending religious liberty cases.}

Senate Democrats Attack Judicial Nominee's Catholic Faith

Religious tests are simply part and parcel of what you Maoists do. It is yet another expression of the utter contempt you have for the Constitution of the Americans you so bitterly hate.

 

[BULLDOG]

The first amendment was specifically for the press to be able expose the wrong doing of our leaders. Of course, Trump-0 and his followers have a problem with that.

Naturally you have never read the document you fight so hard to destroy.

The First Amendment acknowledges first and foremost the right of a free people to speak. This is something you Maoists seek to crush. Your Gestapo terrorists known as ANTIFA violently attack those who dare speak against your totalitarian party. You pass laws against people speaking words and ideas that your filthy party fears. You destroy art and history that threatens the fiction your dystopian nightmare of a party spreads as the manure for the dictatorship you seek to grow in.

Then we see secondly a free press. No one has suggested that the press be silenced; except you Stalinists that is - such as the war you wage against Hannity in you effort to silence voices that oppose the evil you promote.

Media Matters Using Roy Moore Allegations To Go After Hannity’s Advertisers

The First Amendment also protects the right of assembly, which again is under attack by you fascist thugs with the "safe zones" where white people are prohibited from and other racist impediments to free association.

And of course you openly wage war of the right of people to follow the faith of their own convictions. Beyond just the "bake the cake peasant" demands of the evil left, we have the religious litmus tests of Feinstein and other Communists in direct violation of our Constitution. You Marxists demand that Catholics be prohibited from public office due to their religion.

The Constitution on you Communists is like salt on slugs.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Who told you all that crap? I'll be happy to explain why it's all wrong, but just one subject at a time. No need trying to muddle and misdirect the discussion by jumping from one subject to the next like Hannity does.
Lets start with your silly claim that the left (not Marxists or followers of Mao) want to ban Catholics from public office.

Who told me all that "crap" Comrade? It is the 1st Amendment.

And no Comrade, it is not "wrong." You seek to perpetrate evil, you seek to crush all civil rights and establish a dictatorship that you believe will benefit you.

As far as you Marxists banning Catholics from public office, that ship has sailed.

That you are utterly and completely dishonest is simply part of you being a Stalinist.

{
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), expressed grave concerns that Barrett is a Catholic in good standing.

"When you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you, and that's of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for, for years in this country," Feinstein said.

It was an "Are you now or have you ever been a Catholic" moment - and it was completely disgraceful. }

{
Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) accused Barrett of being unfit for the bench because of her ties to Alliance Defending Freedom - an organization he called a "hate" group.

Barrett had once delivered a speech at the renowned law firm that specializes in defending religious liberty cases.}

Senate Democrats Attack Judicial Nominee's Catholic Faith

Religious tests are simply part and parcel of what you Maoists do. It is yet another expression of the utter contempt you have for the Constitution of the Americans you so bitterly hate.

You are really dumb, but funny dumb. Your assumptions are all wrong.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The AR-15 has never been used in a war.....ever. The M-16 is the military weapon...dipshit, the AR-15 has been the most popular civilain rifle for decades, there are over 13 million of them in private hands......

So, nitwit, if you RENAME a "nuke" and call it "baby boy" its no longer a nuke?

Because the AR-15 was renamed but basically is the same as the M-16, its no longer a military-style, lethal weapon??

What the hell is the matter with you idiots???

The .223 caliber is smaller than most handgun calibers. It is slightly larger than a .22.

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

 

[nat4900]

Three one thousandths of an inch.

Go play with your "three thousandths of an inch".........LOL

 

[Uncensored2008]

The first amendment was specifically for the press to be able expose the wrong doing of our leaders. Of course, Trump-0 and his followers have a problem with that.

Naturally you have never read the document you fight so hard to destroy.

The First Amendment acknowledges first and foremost the right of a free people to speak. This is something you Maoists seek to crush. Your Gestapo terrorists known as ANTIFA violently attack those who dare speak against your totalitarian party. You pass laws against people speaking words and ideas that your filthy party fears. You destroy art and history that threatens the fiction your dystopian nightmare of a party spreads as the manure for the dictatorship you seek to grow in.

Then we see secondly a free press. No one has suggested that the press be silenced; except you Stalinists that is - such as the war you wage against Hannity in you effort to silence voices that oppose the evil you promote.

Media Matters Using Roy Moore Allegations To Go After Hannity’s Advertisers

The First Amendment also protects the right of assembly, which again is under attack by you fascist thugs with the "safe zones" where white people are prohibited from and other racist impediments to free association.

And of course you openly wage war of the right of people to follow the faith of their own convictions. Beyond just the "bake the cake peasant" demands of the evil left, we have the religious litmus tests of Feinstein and other Communists in direct violation of our Constitution. You Marxists demand that Catholics be prohibited from public office due to their religion.

The Constitution on you Communists is like salt on slugs.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Who told you all that crap? I'll be happy to explain why it's all wrong, but just one subject at a time. No need trying to muddle and misdirect the discussion by jumping from one subject to the next like Hannity does.
Lets start with your silly claim that the left (not Marxists or followers of Mao) want to ban Catholics from public office.

Who told me all that "crap" Comrade? It is the 1st Amendment.

And no Comrade, it is not "wrong." You seek to perpetrate evil, you seek to crush all civil rights and establish a dictatorship that you believe will benefit you.

As far as you Marxists banning Catholics from public office, that ship has sailed.

That you are utterly and completely dishonest is simply part of you being a Stalinist.

{
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), expressed grave concerns that Barrett is a Catholic in good standing.

"When you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you, and that's of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for, for years in this country," Feinstein said.

It was an "Are you now or have you ever been a Catholic" moment - and it was completely disgraceful. }

{
Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) accused Barrett of being unfit for the bench because of her ties to Alliance Defending Freedom - an organization he called a "hate" group.

Barrett had once delivered a speech at the renowned law firm that specializes in defending religious liberty cases.}

Senate Democrats Attack Judicial Nominee's Catholic Faith

Religious tests are simply part and parcel of what you Maoists do. It is yet another expression of the utter contempt you have for the Constitution of the Americans you so bitterly hate.

You are really dumb, but funny dumb. Your assumptions are all wrong.

Of course. Pointing out your deliberate and direct lies as your evil party uses religious tests to ban enemies from serving on the bench is "dumb." Anything that defies the agenda of your party is "dumb."

{
The nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, a law professor up for an appeals court seat, had raised the issue herself in articles and speeches over the years. The Democratic senators on the Judiciary Committee zeroed in on her writings, and in the process prompted accusations that they were engaged in religious bigotry.

“The dogma lives loudly within you,” declared Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, in what has become an infamous phrase. Senator Orrin Hatch, Republican of Utah, accused his colleagues of employing an unconstitutional “religious test” for office.}

NY Times Defends Democratic Religious Test for Trump's Court of Appeals Nominee

Your utter and complete contempt for the United States Constitution is what is "dumb," Comrade.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States

You have zero knowledge of what it is you wage war against. Nor do you have any care; you serve your party and leave all thought to your rulers.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Three one thousandths of an inch.

Go play with your "three thousandths of an inch".........LOL

Yes, you are indeed an ignorant troll.

.22 vs .223

What is the difference Comrade troll?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hundreds of millions? More like a few thousand, scattered across the country, I'm afraid.

I meant tens of millions. There are approximately 55 million gun owners who own 150 million guns. Id have to say most of those 10's of millions won't give it up. The people that do will be mostly from the NE.

If you are an American citizen, living within its boundaries, then you will submit to American Law - no exceptions - and 99.99999% of Americans will do just that. Sorry.

It’s just great to know we have a second mmendmwnt that makes it very difficult for government to create a strict ban that takes firearms away from resoonsible citizens. I’s Like to see how far Democrats think they can get, without the clear written constitutional process of repealing the second annendment.

Had Hillary been elected, the second (and first) Amendment would already be part of past never to return.

The Stalinists use judicial activism to repeal the Constitution. One more Elena Kagan on the court and the Constitution is done, over, gone forever. This is the goal of the left.

That would only show they don’t know how to follow Constitutional provided direction nor have a knowledgeable interpretation of it. I doubt the progressive judges would like to show themselves as that much of an idiot in doing away with the second amendment.

Have Kagan and Ginsburg not already shown themselves this openly hostile to the Constitution? It is not "ignorance" that leads these Marxists to openly shit on the Constitution, it is contempt.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Immaterial... if the United States decides to regulate its militia - well - you will conform to its laws - all within the boundaries of the Constitution.

Who are "the people," Comrade?

When the "right of the people shall not be infringed" is this the rulers, the oligarchs?

 

[BULLDOG]

The AR-15 has never been used in a war.....ever. The M-16 is the military weapon...dipshit, the AR-15 has been the most popular civilain rifle for decades, there are over 13 million of them in private hands......

So, nitwit, if you RENAME a "nuke" and call it "baby boy" its no longer a nuke?

Because the AR-15 was renamed but basically is the same as the M-16, its no longer a military-style, lethal weapon??

What the hell is the matter with you idiots???

The .223 caliber is smaller than most handgun calibers. It is slightly larger than a .22.

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

The .22LR cartridge was introduced in 1887, while the .223 cartridge was designed in 1964, specifically for use in the M-16 rifle.
Can you point out which is a 22 and which is a 223? They look so much alike that I can't tell.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The AR-15 has never been used in a war.....ever. The M-16 is the military weapon...dipshit, the AR-15 has been the most popular civilain rifle for decades, there are over 13 million of them in private hands......

So, nitwit, if you RENAME a "nuke" and call it "baby boy" its no longer a nuke?

Because the AR-15 was renamed but basically is the same as the M-16, its no longer a military-style, lethal weapon??

What the hell is the matter with you idiots???

The .223 caliber is smaller than most handgun calibers. It is slightly larger than a .22.

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

The .22LR cartridge was introduced in 1887, while the .223 cartridge was designed in 1964, specifically for use in the M-16 rifle.
Can you point out which is a 22 and which is a 223? They look so much alike that I can't tell.

Do you know what "diameter" is, Comrade?

The slug is the same size, Comrade.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Math is hard, da retard?

 

[Kondor3]

[
Immaterial... if the United States decides to regulate its militia - well - you will conform to its laws - all within the boundaries of the Constitution.

Who are "the people," Comrade?...

You and I are "the people", Sparky.

If enough of The People want it, we will have mandatory national standards and enforcement mechanisms with respect to sales, licensing, registration, etc.

...When the "right of the people shall not be infringed" is this the rulers, the oligarchs?

No one is infringing upon rights... merely 'regulating the militia'... 'well'... as provided for in the Constitution.

And you will obey the laws of the United States, whether you like them or not.

 

[BULLDOG]

The AR-15 has never been used in a war.....ever. The M-16 is the military weapon...dipshit, the AR-15 has been the most popular civilain rifle for decades, there are over 13 million of them in private hands......

So, nitwit, if you RENAME a "nuke" and call it "baby boy" its no longer a nuke?

Because the AR-15 was renamed but basically is the same as the M-16, its no longer a military-style, lethal weapon??

What the hell is the matter with you idiots???

The .223 caliber is smaller than most handgun calibers. It is slightly larger than a .22.

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

The .22LR cartridge was introduced in 1887, while the .223 cartridge was designed in 1964, specifically for use in the M-16 rifle.
Can you point out which is a 22 and which is a 223? They look so much alike that I can't tell.

Do you know what "diameter" is, Comrade?

The slug is the same size, Comrade.

But diameter isn't the only difference between a 22 caliber bullet and a 223. The powder load behind them, the weight, and the shape counts too. Compare the velocity and knock down force of the two as well. The 223 was specifically designed for the M16. That's a military weapon, in case you didn't know.

 

[2aguy]

So, nitwit, if you RENAME a "nuke" and call it "baby boy" its no longer a nuke?

Because the AR-15 was renamed but basically is the same as the M-16, its no longer a military-style, lethal weapon??

What the hell is the matter with you idiots???

The .223 caliber is smaller than most handgun calibers. It is slightly larger than a .22.

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

The .22LR cartridge was introduced in 1887, while the .223 cartridge was designed in 1964, specifically for use in the M-16 rifle.
Can you point out which is a 22 and which is a 223? They look so much alike that I can't tell.

Do you know what "diameter" is, Comrade?

The slug is the same size, Comrade.

But diameter isn't the only difference between a 22 caliber bullet and a 223. The powder load behind them, the weight, and the shape counts too. Compare the velocity and knock down force of the two as well. The 223 was specifically designed for the M16. That's a military weapon, in case you didn't know.

Yes....the AR-15 is a civilian weapon...so? You guys want to ban them based on their bullets? Considering the .357 magnum is even bigger, and you guys don't bitch about that round...yet.

 

[BULLDOG]

The .223 caliber is smaller than most handgun calibers. It is slightly larger than a .22.

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

The .22LR cartridge was introduced in 1887, while the .223 cartridge was designed in 1964, specifically for use in the M-16 rifle.
Can you point out which is a 22 and which is a 223? They look so much alike that I can't tell.

Do you know what "diameter" is, Comrade?

The slug is the same size, Comrade.

But diameter isn't the only difference between a 22 caliber bullet and a 223. The powder load behind them, the weight, and the shape counts too. Compare the velocity and knock down force of the two as well. The 223 was specifically designed for the M16. That's a military weapon, in case you didn't know.

Yes....the AR-15 is a civilian weapon...so? You guys want to ban them based on their bullets? Considering the .357 magnum is even bigger, and you guys don't bitch about that round...yet.

Now, that's not what I said. That goofy gun nut said "A .223 IS a .22" Only an idiot or a lying gun nut would try to make anyone believe a .22 and a .223 were the same thing. Which do you think he is, an idiot, or a lying gun nut?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Immaterial... if the United States decides to regulate its militia - well - you will conform to its laws - all within the boundaries of the Constitution.

Who are "the people," Comrade?...

You and I are "the people", Sparky.

If enough of The People want it, we will have mandatory national standards and enforcement mechanisms with respect to sales, licensing, registration, etc.

All to have to do is succeed in passing a constitutional amendment.

Or win the civil war you are so treasonously waging.

..
No one is infringing upon rights... merely 'regulating the militia'... 'well'... as provided for in the Constitution.

And you will obey the laws of the United States, whether you like them or not.

No one, except you Communists, who are shitting on the first and second amendments in your war to end all civil rights.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So, nitwit, if you RENAME a "nuke" and call it "baby boy" its no longer a nuke?

Because the AR-15 was renamed but basically is the same as the M-16, its no longer a military-style, lethal weapon??

What the hell is the matter with you idiots???

The .223 caliber is smaller than most handgun calibers. It is slightly larger than a .22.

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

The .22LR cartridge was introduced in 1887, while the .223 cartridge was designed in 1964, specifically for use in the M-16 rifle.
Can you point out which is a 22 and which is a 223? They look so much alike that I can't tell.

Do you know what "diameter" is, Comrade?

The slug is the same size, Comrade.

But diameter isn't the only difference between a 22 caliber bullet and a 223. The powder load behind them, the weight, and the shape counts too. Compare the velocity and knock down force of the two as well. The 223 was specifically designed for the M16. That's a military weapon, in case you didn't know.

Actually comrade, "caliber" is ONLY a measurement of diameter.

Load has nothing to do with it.

A .223 IS a .22

Facts on you Communists are like salt on slugs.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

The .22LR cartridge was introduced in 1887, while the .223 cartridge was designed in 1964, specifically for use in the M-16 rifle.
Can you point out which is a 22 and which is a 223? They look so much alike that I can't tell.

Do you know what "diameter" is, Comrade?

The slug is the same size, Comrade.

But diameter isn't the only difference between a 22 caliber bullet and a 223. The powder load behind them, the weight, and the shape counts too. Compare the velocity and knock down force of the two as well. The 223 was specifically designed for the M16. That's a military weapon, in case you didn't know.

Yes....the AR-15 is a civilian weapon...so? You guys want to ban them based on their bullets? Considering the .357 magnum is even bigger, and you guys don't bitch about that round...yet.

Now, that's not what I said. That goofy gun nut said "A .223 IS a .22" Only an idiot or a lying gun nut would try to make anyone believe a .22 and a .223 were the same thing. Which do you think he is, an idiot, or a lying gun nut?

Comrade, a .223 IS in fact a .22 slug.

Facts are hard, da Comrade?

 

[BULLDOG]

The .223 caliber is smaller than most handgun calibers. It is slightly larger than a .22.

Three one thousandths of an inch.

A .223 IS a .22

The demonization of a .223 is a combination of the contempt the left has for facts and an expression of the complete ignorance that drives the Marxist democrats.

The .22LR cartridge was introduced in 1887, while the .223 cartridge was designed in 1964, specifically for use in the M-16 rifle.
Can you point out which is a 22 and which is a 223? They look so much alike that I can't tell.

Do you know what "diameter" is, Comrade?

The slug is the same size, Comrade.

But diameter isn't the only difference between a 22 caliber bullet and a 223. The powder load behind them, the weight, and the shape counts too. Compare the velocity and knock down force of the two as well. The 223 was specifically designed for the M16. That's a military weapon, in case you didn't know.

Actually comrade, "caliber" is ONLY a measurement of diameter.

Load has nothing to do with it.

A .223 IS a .22

Facts on you Communists are like salt on slugs.

Yes, I understand diameter. Your lying implication was that there was no difference between a ,22 which is just a small varmint shell and a .223 which was specifically designed to be used in combat with an M16.