- Oct 31, 2012
- 54,078
- 53,110
- 3,605
Clinton is going to win big!
But not the country
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Clinton is going to win big!
I think that's a great idea! I hope she makes GW the central plank of her platform. I can't wait to hear her in the Presidential debates claiming that GW is more important than dealing ISIS, Iran, Illegal immigration, Workforce decline and Inner City crime.
Never mind about all that, a vote for Hildabeast gets you a free college education.
Hillary Clinton Hints Of Going Beyond Obama By Floating The Idea Of Debt Free College
Vote Hildabeast!!!
What a load of BULL SHIT! This is the same Hillary Clinton who approves of Culling the masses by any means... Freeze them to death! Starve them to death! What this evil woman proposes will kill millions.. The same people she will kill with her agenda are the same fools who will vote for her...Fucking Morons
I wish I were making this stuff up.
Interesting. I stand corrected. About the paper existing, that is. It doesn't make any sense, of course, given that methane has an atmospheric half-life of 7 years. It's not possible for methane to build up and cause warming by itself. It can just help the CO2 a bit.
FYI, don't worry about Hildabeast. She is offerring free stuff, so she should be just fine.
Hillary Clinton Hints Of Going Beyond Obama By Floating The Idea Of Debt Free College
No doubt, she will promise to pass on the expense of these climate meausures to the rich folk.
What a load of BULL SHIT! This is the same Hillary Clinton who approves of Culling the masses by any means... Freeze them to death! Starve them to death! What this evil woman proposes will kill millions.. The same people she will kill with her agenda are the same fools who will vote for her...Fucking Morons
Such special little snowflakes the hardcore deniers are. Most of their posts should be shuffled to the conspiracy folder, but for some reason, their constant trolling insanity is given a pass.
Dearest little Stephanie, perhaps you should talk to those oh so liberal Texans that are installing 1.2 Gw of solar near Austen at less cost than even the dirtiest of coal. Or those commies in Oklahoma that just bought three wind farms at about half the price of dirty coal. And then there is the matter of the two super factories that are now producing grid scale batteries in the USA.Fuck!! We did not learn from Solyndra?
No, Hilllery's CRONIES are all in the solar panel business. so that's what we shall have shoved down our throats.
Mr. Votto, do you reckon that you will ever be anything other than full of shit? The only period in geological history that more CO2 was being put into the atmosphere than today was those extinction periods when the rising tempertures caused the outgassing of the oceans methane clatherates. Such people as you that flap yap without any sort of knowledge at all concerning the subject are examples of why other consider Americans such stupid Rubes.MThe depths of this fraud is breathtaking
There's an easy solution for that. Stop pushing your fraud.
Here's a hint. When the whole world says you're full of shit, it's not because of a vast secret global socialist conspiracy against you. It's because you're full of shit.
Again, this thread is not about your denier conspiracy cult's fraud, no matter how much you want to make it about your conspiracy cult's fraud.
Speaking of being full of shit, scientists estimate that dino's emitted just as much, if not more, carbon than we create today just from passing gas.
Do you reckon this is how they all died off?
lmao, the same big donors the candidates they backed in 2014 lost almost every damn race?http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-lays-out-climate-change-plan.html?_r=1
---
She set a goal to produce 33 percent of the nation’s electricity from renewable sources by 2027, up from 7 percent today — a higher goal than the 20 percent that President Obama has called for by 2030.
Mrs. Clinton’s strategists see climate change as a winning issue for 2016. They believe it is a cause she can advance to win over deep-pocketed donors and liberal activists in the nominating campaign, where she is facing Democratic challengers to her left on the issue. It is also one that can be a weapon against Republicans in a general election. Polls show that a majority of voters support candidates who pledge policy action on the warming climate.
...
Her campaign put the cost of her clean electricity initiatives at about $60 billion over 10 years, which it said would be offset by ending tax breaks for oil and gas producers.
---
Sanders and O'Malley have even stronger proposals, and Hillary is taking fire from the left for not going far enough. In any case, it's a winning issue for Democrats.