Hillary Presents Global Warming Plan

I still fail to see the carot to be dangled in front of voters.

Where is the free Obamaphone?

Hildabeast should really think this through.

Now if I were Trump, I would given everyone a free carbon producing HUMV.

Your problem is you're thinking like a Republican. You want free stuff, so you assume everyone thinks like you..

Um.......you do know who voted for Obama, right?

I don't want free stuff, I just want Hildabeast and the GOP to just leave me the hell alone.

The only reason people voted for Obama was that he promised them cheaper health care for more people. He did this by lying. That's right, because he knew that they would never agree to pay higher rates for less coverage if they knew the truth.

If not, why did he lie do you reckon?

Yes, the poor are just as greedy as the rich.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-lays-out-climate-change-plan.html?_r=1
---
She set a goal to produce 33 percent of the nation’s electricity from renewable sources by 2027, up from 7 percent today — a higher goal than the 20 percent that President Obama has called for by 2030.

Mrs. Clinton’s strategists see climate change as a winning issue for 2016. They believe it is a cause she can advance to win over deep-pocketed donors and liberal activists in the nominating campaign, where she is facing Democratic challengers to her left on the issue. It is also one that can be a weapon against Republicans in a general election. Polls show that a majority of voters support candidates who pledge policy action on the warming climate.
...
Her campaign put the cost of her clean electricity initiatives at about $60 billion over 10 years, which it said would be offset by ending tax breaks for oil and gas producers.
---

Sanders and O'Malley have even stronger proposals, and Hillary is taking fire from the left for not going far enough. In any case, it's a winning issue for Democrats.
she gave a speech then got on her private jet and polluted like the lying hypocrite she is.

and she really wants to fuck the country over by forcing us to live the way she tells us to live, so of course the moronic left supports her, she hates the country and you lover her for that.

you people, never think.

:clap:

She has not lived nor will live the way she wants the average person to live. And that goes for most in the 'political class'.
 
MThe depths of this fraud is breathtaking

There's an easy solution for that. Stop pushing your fraud.

Here's a hint. When the whole world says you're full of shit, it's not because of a vast secret global socialist conspiracy against you. It's because you're full of shit.

Again, this thread is not about your denier conspiracy cult's fraud, no matter how much you want to make it about your conspiracy cult's fraud.
 
she gave a speech then got on her private jet and polluted like the lying hypocrite she is.

If you want to live a cave, just do so. Nobody's stopping you. Just go.

However, understand that you're the only one demanding people give up technology. Hence, you are the only one who is a stinking hypocrite for not living in a cave. Also understand we will not allow socialist thug ratfuks like you to force us to live in caves.

live in a cave? Most of us live in normal sized house, not huge mansions that produce huge amounts of carbon emissions like those who preach global warming to us, HIllary included. Most of us drive small cars, not huge SUV's and limos like those who preach global warming to us. Most of us are not jet setters, with one plane trip that emits as much carbon into the atmosphere as a years worth of SUV's emissions.
 
So the denier cult uses this thread to spread their fake data.

Global Warming is real and the science has been settled for the last 15 years.

There is no debate.

And actually the point is mute, soon enough the consequences will force the human race as a whole to take drastic action.

There have been 5 major mass extinctions in the history of life on Earth, we are now in the 6th mass extinction. All this is known fact. The fact that we have a presidential candidate that is at least willing to take action is a glimmer of hope.

Republicans will continue to hold their heads under the sand until its too late. Once again, they will have to be dragged into reality.
 
MThe depths of this fraud is breathtaking

There's an easy solution for that. Stop pushing your fraud.

Here's a hint. When the whole world says you're full of shit, it's not because of a vast secret global socialist conspiracy against you. It's because you're full of shit.

Again, this thread is not about your denier conspiracy cult's fraud, no matter how much you want to make it about your conspiracy cult's fraud.

Speaking of being full of shit, scientists estimate that dino's emitted just as much, if not more, carbon than we create today just from passing gas.

Do you reckon this is how they all died off?
 
Speaking of being full of shit, scientists estimate that dino's emitted just as much, if not more, carbon than we create today just from passing gas.

Do you reckon this is how they all died off?

I reckon you're just a troll now. That's all most deniers are capable of.
 
So the denier cult uses this thread to spread their fake data.

Global Warming is real and the science has been settled for the last 15 years.

There is no debate.

And actually the point is mute, soon enough the consequences will force the human race as a whole to take drastic action.

There have been 5 major mass extinctions in the history of life on Earth, we are now in the 6th mass extinction. All this is known fact. The fact that we have a presidential candidate that is at least willing to take action is a glimmer of hope.

Republicans will continue to hold their heads under the sand until its too late. Once again, they will have to be dragged into reality.

And guess what, the human race will go extinct one day and there is not a damn thing any of us can do about it. In fact, about 98% of species have gone extinct since the dawn of time, and humans had nothing to do with it.

Why not just let them go peacefully?
 
Hitler was for solar power?

Stephanie just keeps getting nuttier.
We do not know exactly what it was built for, but there is a circular concrete structure suggesting that they were trying to tap into some energy source. I need to look for a link to it.
 
Mamooth

Solyndra earned billions???

Barack Obama s Solyndra scandal smells like it came from Chicago s City Hall - tribunedigital-chicagotribune

The FBI is investigating what happened with Solyndra, a solar panel company that got a $535 million government-backed loan with the help of the Obama White House over the objections of federal budget analysts.

Obama and Vice President Joe Biden got a nice photo op. They got to make speeches about being "green." But then Solyndra went bankrupt. Americans lost jobs. Taxpayers got stuck with the bill. And members of Congress are now in high dudgeon and making speeches.

Federal investigators want to know what role political fundraising played in the guarantee of the questionable loan. Washington bureaucrats warned the deal was lousy. And White House spokesmen flail desperately, like weakened victims in a cheesy vampire movie.

So forget optics. What about smell? It smells bad, and it's going to smell worse.

Or, did you really believe it when the White House mouthpieces — who are also Chicago City Hall mouthpieces — promised they were bringing a new kind of politics to Washington?

This is not a new kind of politics. It's the old kind. The Chicago kind.

And now the Tribune Washington Bureau has reported that the U.S. Department of Energy employee who helped monitor the Solyndra loan guarantee was one of Obama's top fundraisers.
 
I wish I were making this stuff up.

Interesting. I stand corrected. About the paper existing, that is. It doesn't make any sense, of course, given that methane has an atmospheric half-life of 7 years. It's not possible for methane to build up and cause warming by itself. It can just help the CO2 a bit.
 
I wish I were making this stuff up.

Interesting. I stand corrected. About the paper existing, that is. It doesn't make any sense, of course, given that methane has an atmospheric half-life of 7 years. It's not possible for methane to build up and cause warming by itself. It can just help the CO2 a bit.

FYI, don't worry about Hildabeast. She is offerring free stuff, so she should be just fine.

Hillary Clinton Hints Of Going Beyond Obama By Floating The Idea Of Debt Free College

No doubt, she will promise to pass on the expense of these climate meausures to the rich folk.
 
Global warming debunked NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere - NaturalNews.com

Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA's Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence.

As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA's own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth's upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it.

"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," says James Russell from Hampton University, who was one of the lead investigators for the groundbreaking SABER study. "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."

Almost all 'heating' radiation generated by sun is blocked from entering lower atmosphere by CO2
According to the data, up to 95 percent of solar radiation is literally bounced back into space by both CO2 and NO in the upper atmosphere. Without these necessary elements, in other words, the earth would be capable of absorbing potentially devastating amounts of solar energy that would truly melt the polar ice caps and destroy the planet.

"The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet," write H. Schreuder and J. O'Sullivan for PSI. "[T]his compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA's chief climatologist, Dr. James Hansen and his team over at NASA's GISS."

Dr. Hansen, of course, is an outspoken global warming activist who helped spark man-made climate change hysteria in the U.S. back in 1988. Just after the release of the new SABER study, however, Dr. Hansen conveniently retired from his career as a climatologist at NASA, and reportedly now plans to spend his time "on science," and on "drawing attention to [its] implications for young people."

You can read more details of the new NASA SABER study by visiting:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/


Learn more: Global warming debunked NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere - NaturalNews.com
 
I think that's a great idea! I hope she makes GW the central plank of her platform. I can't wait to hear her in the Presidential debates claiming that GW is more important than dealing ISIS, Iran, Illegal immigration, Workforce decline and Inner City crime.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-lays-out-climate-change-plan.html?_r=1
---
She set a goal to produce 33 percent of the nation’s electricity from renewable sources by 2027, up from 7 percent today — a higher goal than the 20 percent that President Obama has called for by 2030.

Mrs. Clinton’s strategists see climate change as a winning issue for 2016. They believe it is a cause she can advance to win over deep-pocketed donors and liberal activists in the nominating campaign, where she is facing Democratic challengers to her left on the issue. It is also one that can be a weapon against Republicans in a general election. Polls show that a majority of voters support candidates who pledge policy action on the warming climate.
...
Her campaign put the cost of her clean electricity initiatives at about $60 billion over 10 years, which it said would be offset by ending tax breaks for oil and gas producers.
---

Sanders and O'Malley have even stronger proposals, and Hillary is taking fire from the left for not going far enough. In any case, it's a winning issue for Democrats.


:blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:

What a load of BULL SHIT! This is the same Hillary Clinton who approves of Culling the masses by any means... Freeze them to death! Starve them to death! What this evil woman proposes will kill millions.. The same people she will kill with her agenda are the same fools who will vote for her...Fucking Morons!
 

Forum List

Back
Top