Hillary - One of the Most Honest Politictians in Washington Today

[Flopper]

Claims that Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and innately untrustworthy is one the most interesting claims to come out of this election season. Indeed, for a surprisingly large percentage of the electorate, the claim that Hillary is innately dishonest is simply accepted as a given. It is an accusation and conviction so ingrained in the conversation about her that any attempt to even question it is often met with shock. And yet here’s the thing: it’s not actually true. Politifact, the Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking project, determined for example that Hillary was actually the most truthful candidate (of either Party) in the 2016 election season. And in general Politifact has determined that Hillary is more honest than most (but not all) politicians they have tracked over the years.

In terms of honesty, Hillary is a politician, and like all politicians she is no stranger to “massaging” and exaggerating the truth. And yes on occasion she will let loose a whopper. But is she worse than other politicians? The evidence suggests that she is no worse, and actually better, than most other politicians. Internet videos like the “13 minutes of Hillary lying” appear to be mostly examples of Hillary changing her position over several decades, combined with annoying but typical political behavior. But similar videos of Donald Trump exist showing him doing an even more extreme version of the same thing. Why is he not being accused of this type of mendacity? In fact, there is very little dispute that Trump has been SIGNIFICANTLY less honest on the campaign trail than Hillary. According to Politifact he is in fact the least honest candidate they’ve ever analyzed! So if the issue of honesty is really that important, why are so many people holding Hillary to such an obviously different standard than Trump?

The latest attack on Hillary's honesty concerns the email investigation. Although the Director of FBI testified to the fact that he found no evidence of Hillary lying, her opposition has maintains otherwise claiming Hillary lied to FBI and lied to congress. I think anyone with an once of intelligence would realize that if there were any evidence of Hillary lying under oath, she would be facing charges of contempt of this Republican Congress or arrested for making false statements to the FBI.

It's a sad indictment of Washington if Hillary Clinton is one of our most honest politicians.

That may well be so. I have never claimed Hillary hasn't twisted the truth to her advantage. She is a very successful politician and you don't become successful in politics by telling, the whole truth and nothing but the truth unless you're under oath.

We send people to Washington to bring home the bacon, get the money for the new roads, keep the local military base open, cut our taxes, eliminate the deficit, etc. We don't ask about the deals, payoffs, and political favors handed out to to get that government contract that will create local jobs. We reward success with re-election.

You may not like it but that's how it works.

 

[mudwhistle]

She is a liar and a crook and furthermore, she was so unworthy that a senator that was serving his first term with a shady kicked her to the curb.

Names and accusations are easy, proof is another thing altogether.

Hey dumb fuck, she just got off "scott free" concerning the unsecured server she used and were hacked ......and how she tried to hide e-mails. She is one of the "elites" and they are above the law. Many have gone to jail for soooo much less.

Do I have to repeat myself? Ok, names and accusations are easy, but proof is another thing altogether.

 

[Flash]

Claims that Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and innately untrustworthy is one the most interesting claims to come out of this election season. Indeed, for a surprisingly large percentage of the electorate, the claim that Hillary is innately dishonest is simply accepted as a given. It is an accusation and conviction so ingrained in the conversation about her that any attempt to even question it is often met with shock. And yet here’s the thing: it’s not actually true. Politifact, the Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking project, determined for example that Hillary was actually the most truthful candidate (of either Party) in the 2016 election season. And in general Politifact has determined that Hillary is more honest than most (but not all) politicians they have tracked over the years.

In terms of honesty, Hillary is a politician, and like all politicians she is no stranger to “massaging” and exaggerating the truth. And yes on occasion she will let loose a whopper. But is she worse than other politicians? The evidence suggests that she is no worse, and actually better, than most other politicians. Internet videos like the “13 minutes of Hillary lying” appear to be mostly examples of Hillary changing her position over several decades, combined with annoying but typical political behavior. But similar videos of Donald Trump exist showing him doing an even more extreme version of the same thing. Why is he not being accused of this type of mendacity? In fact, there is very little dispute that Trump has been SIGNIFICANTLY less honest on the campaign trail than Hillary. According to Politifact he is in fact the least honest candidate they’ve ever analyzed! So if the issue of honesty is really that important, why are so many people holding Hillary to such an obviously different standard than Trump?

The latest attack on Hillary's honesty concerns the email investigation. Although the Director of FBI testified to the fact that he found no evidence of Hillary lying, her opposition has maintains otherwise claiming Hillary lied to FBI and lied to congress. I think anyone with an once of intelligence would realize that if there were any evidence of Hillary lying under oath, she would be facing charges of contempt of this Republican Congress or arrested for making false statements to the FBI.

This post takes the cake for being the absolute most stupid post ever made on the internet if it is not a parody.

Nobody is dumb enough to believe that crap, not even the Gruberidiots and we know how stupid they are.

 

[saveliberty]

Hillary was not in Washington on Saturday, so that would be...a lie.

 

[kaz]

Claims that Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and innately untrustworthy is one the most interesting claims to come out of this election season. Indeed, for a surprisingly large percentage of the electorate, the claim that Hillary is innately dishonest is simply accepted as a given. It is an accusation and conviction so ingrained in the conversation about her that any attempt to even question it is often met with shock. And yet here’s the thing: it’s not actually true. Politifact, the Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking project, determined for example that Hillary was actually the most truthful candidate (of either Party) in the 2016 election season. And in general Politifact has determined that Hillary is more honest than most (but not all) politicians they have tracked over the years.

In terms of honesty, Hillary is a politician, and like all politicians she is no stranger to “massaging” and exaggerating the truth. And yes on occasion she will let loose a whopper. But is she worse than other politicians? The evidence suggests that she is no worse, and actually better, than most other politicians. Internet videos like the “13 minutes of Hillary lying” appear to be mostly examples of Hillary changing her position over several decades, combined with annoying but typical political behavior. But similar videos of Donald Trump exist showing him doing an even more extreme version of the same thing. Why is he not being accused of this type of mendacity? In fact, there is very little dispute that Trump has been SIGNIFICANTLY less honest on the campaign trail than Hillary. According to Politifact he is in fact the least honest candidate they’ve ever analyzed! So if the issue of honesty is really that important, why are so many people holding Hillary to such an obviously different standard than Trump?

The latest attack on Hillary's honesty concerns the email investigation. Although the Director of FBI testified to the fact that he found no evidence of Hillary lying, her opposition has maintains otherwise claiming Hillary lied to FBI and lied to congress. I think anyone with an once of intelligence would realize that if there were any evidence of Hillary lying under oath, she would be facing charges of contempt of this Republican Congress or arrested for making false statements to the FBI.

It's a sad indictment of Washington if Hillary Clinton is one of our most honest politicians.

That may well be so. I have never claimed Hillary hasn't twisted the truth to her advantage. She is a very successful politician and you don't become successful in politics by telling, the whole truth and nothing but the truth unless you're under oath.

We send people to Washington to bring home the bacon, get the money for the new roads, keep the local military base open, cut our taxes, eliminate the deficit, etc. We don't ask about the deals, payoffs, and political favors handed out to to get that government contract that will create local jobs. We reward success with re-election.

You may not like it but that's how it works.

Democrats are just flat out proud to say you drank the kool-aid, aren't you?

 

[Uncensored2008]

By any objective measure Hillary Clinton is not just the most qualified candidate this season, she’s one of the most qualified people to ever seek the office. Even Marco Rubio, one-time choice of the GOP establishment (and tea-party love-child) stated in a Republican debate that, “If this is a resume contest, Hillary Clinton is going to be the new President of the United States.”

They let you vote?

Forget gun control, we need strict moron control.

 

[francoHFW]

Claims that Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and innately untrustworthy is one the most interesting claims to come out of this election season. Indeed, for a surprisingly large percentage of the electorate, the claim that Hillary is innately dishonest is simply accepted as a given. It is an accusation and conviction so ingrained in the conversation about her that any attempt to even question it is often met with shock. And yet here’s the thing: it’s not actually true. Politifact, the Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking project, determined for example that Hillary was actually the most truthful candidate (of either Party) in the 2016 election season. And in general Politifact has determined that Hillary is more honest than most (but not all) politicians they have tracked over the years.

In terms of honesty, Hillary is a politician, and like all politicians she is no stranger to “massaging” and exaggerating the truth. And yes on occasion she will let loose a whopper. But is she worse than other politicians? The evidence suggests that she is no worse, and actually better, than most other politicians. Internet videos like the “13 minutes of Hillary lying” appear to be mostly examples of Hillary changing her position over several decades, combined with annoying but typical political behavior. But similar videos of Donald Trump exist showing him doing an even more extreme version of the same thing. Why is he not being accused of this type of mendacity? In fact, there is very little dispute that Trump has been SIGNIFICANTLY less honest on the campaign trail than Hillary. According to Politifact he is in fact the least honest candidate they’ve ever analyzed! So if the issue of honesty is really that important, why are so many people holding Hillary to such an obviously different standard than Trump?

The latest attack on Hillary's honesty concerns the email investigation. Although the Director of FBI testified to the fact that he found no evidence of Hillary lying, her opposition has maintains otherwise claiming Hillary lied to FBI and lied to congress. I think anyone with an once of intelligence would realize that if there were any evidence of Hillary lying under oath, she would be facing charges of contempt of this Republican Congress or arrested for making false statements to the FBI.

It's a sad indictment of Washington if Hillary Clinton is one of our most honest politicians.

That may well be so. I have never claimed Hillary hasn't twisted the truth to her advantage. She is a very successful politician and you don't become successful in politics by telling, the whole truth and nothing but the truth unless you're under oath.

We send people to Washington to bring home the bacon, get the money for the new roads, keep the local military base open, cut our taxes, eliminate the deficit, etc. We don't ask about the deals, payoffs, and political favors handed out to to get that government contract that will create local jobs. We reward success with re-election.

You may not like it but that's how it works.

Some evidence Hillary corruption lies have actually happened would be nice. Back to that irrelevant Tuzla story again....
What's important is what the dupes FEEL LOL Last Week Tonight with John Oliver | Facebook

 

[francoHFW]

Claims that Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and innately untrustworthy is one the most interesting claims to come out of this election season. Indeed, for a surprisingly large percentage of the electorate, the claim that Hillary is innately dishonest is simply accepted as a given. It is an accusation and conviction so ingrained in the conversation about her that any attempt to even question it is often met with shock. And yet here’s the thing: it’s not actually true. Politifact, the Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking project, determined for example that Hillary was actually the most truthful candidate (of either Party) in the 2016 election season. And in general Politifact has determined that Hillary is more honest than most (but not all) politicians they have tracked over the years.

In terms of honesty, Hillary is a politician, and like all politicians she is no stranger to “massaging” and exaggerating the truth. And yes on occasion she will let loose a whopper. But is she worse than other politicians? The evidence suggests that she is no worse, and actually better, than most other politicians. Internet videos like the “13 minutes of Hillary lying” appear to be mostly examples of Hillary changing her position over several decades, combined with annoying but typical political behavior. But similar videos of Donald Trump exist showing him doing an even more extreme version of the same thing. Why is he not being accused of this type of mendacity? In fact, there is very little dispute that Trump has been SIGNIFICANTLY less honest on the campaign trail than Hillary. According to Politifact he is in fact the least honest candidate they’ve ever analyzed! So if the issue of honesty is really that important, why are so many people holding Hillary to such an obviously different standard than Trump?

The latest attack on Hillary's honesty concerns the email investigation. Although the Director of FBI testified to the fact that he found no evidence of Hillary lying, her opposition has maintains otherwise claiming Hillary lied to FBI and lied to congress. I think anyone with an once of intelligence would realize that if there were any evidence of Hillary lying under oath, she would be facing charges of contempt of this Republican Congress or arrested for making false statements to the FBI.

It's a sad indictment of Washington if Hillary Clinton is one of our most honest politicians.

That may well be so. I have never claimed Hillary hasn't twisted the truth to her advantage. She is a very successful politician and you don't become successful in politics by telling, the whole truth and nothing but the truth unless you're under oath.

We send people to Washington to bring home the bacon, get the money for the new roads, keep the local military base open, cut our taxes, eliminate the deficit, etc. We don't ask about the deals, payoffs, and political favors handed out to to get that government contract that will create local jobs. We reward success with re-election.

You may not like it but that's how it works.

Democrats are just flat out proud to say you drank the kool-aid, aren't you?

Such as, dupe? You're full of discredited New BS GOP horse shytte, repeated daily. see sig.

 

[francoHFW]

By any objective measure Hillary Clinton is not just the most qualified candidate this season, she’s one of the most qualified people to ever seek the office. Even Marco Rubio, one-time choice of the GOP establishment (and tea-party love-child) stated in a Republican debate that, “If this is a resume contest, Hillary Clinton is going to be the new President of the United States.”

They let you vote?

Forget gun control, we need strict moron control.

Any actual argument, Pubtroll?

 

[francoHFW]

Claims that Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and innately untrustworthy is one the most interesting claims to come out of this election season. Indeed, for a surprisingly large percentage of the electorate, the claim that Hillary is innately dishonest is simply accepted as a given. It is an accusation and conviction so ingrained in the conversation about her that any attempt to even question it is often met with shock. And yet here’s the thing: it’s not actually true. Politifact, the Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking project, determined for example that Hillary was actually the most truthful candidate (of either Party) in the 2016 election season. And in general Politifact has determined that Hillary is more honest than most (but not all) politicians they have tracked over the years.

In terms of honesty, Hillary is a politician, and like all politicians she is no stranger to “massaging” and exaggerating the truth. And yes on occasion she will let loose a whopper. But is she worse than other politicians? The evidence suggests that she is no worse, and actually better, than most other politicians. Internet videos like the “13 minutes of Hillary lying” appear to be mostly examples of Hillary changing her position over several decades, combined with annoying but typical political behavior. But similar videos of Donald Trump exist showing him doing an even more extreme version of the same thing. Why is he not being accused of this type of mendacity? In fact, there is very little dispute that Trump has been SIGNIFICANTLY less honest on the campaign trail than Hillary. According to Politifact he is in fact the least honest candidate they’ve ever analyzed! So if the issue of honesty is really that important, why are so many people holding Hillary to such an obviously different standard than Trump?

The latest attack on Hillary's honesty concerns the email investigation. Although the Director of FBI testified to the fact that he found no evidence of Hillary lying, her opposition has maintains otherwise claiming Hillary lied to FBI and lied to congress. I think anyone with an once of intelligence would realize that if there were any evidence of Hillary lying under oath, she would be facing charges of contempt of this Republican Congress or arrested for making false statements to the FBI.

This post takes the cake for being the absolute most stupid post ever made on the internet if it is not a parody.

Nobody is dumb enough to believe that crap, not even the Gruberidiots and we know how stupid they are.

Any actual argument, ignorant hater dupe? Brainwashing is so sad to see...The whole gd New BS GOP...

 

[Flopper]

What keeps getting lost in the debates about whether or not Hillary lied to Congress is the REASON why she wanted to work through private servers in her home and not through official government servers. When you're cutting deals with the rich and powerful both here and around the world...the last thing you want is an electronic record of how it was all arranged. Hillary did what she did because Hillary was using her office to enrich her foundation.

How bout some evidence for all your bs? BTW, the foundation is a great charity which does it's good works ITSELF, with no evidence of corruption, dupe.

Appearance of conflict of interest. That's all you need in politics. The Foundation pays Hillary a salary while taking big donations from foreign heads of state while she was Sec State.

According to the Clinton tax returns, her only salary for the last 15 years have come only from the federal goverment for her work as a US Senator and Secretary of State.
Tax History Project -- Presidential Tax Returns

 

[kaz]

What keeps getting lost in the debates about whether or not Hillary lied to Congress is the REASON why she wanted to work through private servers in her home and not through official government servers. When you're cutting deals with the rich and powerful both here and around the world...the last thing you want is an electronic record of how it was all arranged. Hillary did what she did because Hillary was using her office to enrich her foundation.

How bout some evidence for all your bs? BTW, the foundation is a great charity which does it's good works ITSELF, with no evidence of corruption, dupe.

Appearance of conflict of interest. That's all you need in politics. The Foundation pays Hillary a salary while taking big donations from foreign heads of state while she was Sec State.

According to the Clinton tax returns, her only salary for the last 15 years have come only from the federal goverment for her work as a US Senator and Secretary of State.
Tax History Project -- Presidential Tax Returns

Then how did she become a hundred millionaire?

 

[francoHFW]

THE story of the last 30 years- the New BS GOP and the ignorant dupes...

 

[francoHFW]

What keeps getting lost in the debates about whether or not Hillary lied to Congress is the REASON why she wanted to work through private servers in her home and not through official government servers. When you're cutting deals with the rich and powerful both here and around the world...the last thing you want is an electronic record of how it was all arranged. Hillary did what she did because Hillary was using her office to enrich her foundation.

How bout some evidence for all your bs? BTW, the foundation is a great charity which does it's good works ITSELF, with no evidence of corruption, dupe.

Appearance of conflict of interest. That's all you need in politics. The Foundation pays Hillary a salary while taking big donations from foreign heads of state while she was Sec State.

According to the Clinton tax returns, her only salary for the last 15 years have come only from the federal goverment for her work as a US Senator and Secretary of State.
Tax History Project -- Presidential Tax Returns

Then how did she become a hundred millionaire?

She made loads from speeches without changing ANY of her policies. Duh.

 

[francoHFW]

And she's worth much less than 100 million, hater dupe functional moron.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...6dXoas7Aw_XKgO69A&sig2=NcZniRpR5lCidnaBowmuNQ

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Claims that Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and innately untrustworthy is one the most interesting claims to come out of this election season. Indeed, for a surprisingly large percentage of the electorate, the claim that Hillary is innately dishonest is simply accepted as a given. It is an accusation and conviction so ingrained in the conversation about her that any attempt to even question it is often met with shock. And yet here’s the thing: it’s not actually true. Politifact, the Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking project, determined for example that Hillary was actually the most truthful candidate (of either Party) in the 2016 election season. And in general Politifact has determined that Hillary is more honest than most (but not all) politicians they have tracked over the years.

In terms of honesty, Hillary is a politician, and like all politicians she is no stranger to “massaging” and exaggerating the truth. And yes on occasion she will let loose a whopper. But is she worse than other politicians? The evidence suggests that she is no worse, and actually better, than most other politicians. Internet videos like the “13 minutes of Hillary lying” appear to be mostly examples of Hillary changing her position over several decades, combined with annoying but typical political behavior. But similar videos of Donald Trump exist showing him doing an even more extreme version of the same thing. Why is he not being accused of this type of mendacity? In fact, there is very little dispute that Trump has been SIGNIFICANTLY less honest on the campaign trail than Hillary. According to Politifact he is in fact the least honest candidate they’ve ever analyzed! So if the issue of honesty is really that important, why are so many people holding Hillary to such an obviously different standard than Trump?

The latest attack on Hillary's honesty concerns the email investigation. Although the Director of FBI testified to the fact that he found no evidence of Hillary lying, her opposition has maintains otherwise claiming Hillary lied to FBI and lied to congress. I think anyone with an once of intelligence would realize that if there were any evidence of Hillary lying under oath, she would be facing charges of contempt of this Republican Congress or arrested for making false statements to the FBI.

Bullshit!!! More lies from a libtard.

 

[Wyatt earp]

 

[Flash]

[

Any actual argument, ignorant hater dupe? Brainwashing is so sad to see...The whole gd New BS GOP...

You are confused.

I am not a Republican you nitwit. I have told you that several times but you have a poor attention span. Learn to listen better. No wonder you are a Libtard.

You stupid Moon Bats hate Trump with a passion because he is running against your shithead candidate so you can take your comments on hate and cram it up your Libtard ass.

Crooked Hillary is the most corrupt, incompetent and dishonest candidate to ever run for President of the US and no amount of denial like what was posted in that ridiculous article will not change that.

She is scum and you are an idiot for trying to support a low life bitch like that.

 

[francoHFW]

Claims that Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar and innately untrustworthy is one the most interesting claims to come out of this election season. Indeed, for a surprisingly large percentage of the electorate, the claim that Hillary is innately dishonest is simply accepted as a given. It is an accusation and conviction so ingrained in the conversation about her that any attempt to even question it is often met with shock. And yet here’s the thing: it’s not actually true. Politifact, the Pulitzer prize-winning fact-checking project, determined for example that Hillary was actually the most truthful candidate (of either Party) in the 2016 election season. And in general Politifact has determined that Hillary is more honest than most (but not all) politicians they have tracked over the years.

In terms of honesty, Hillary is a politician, and like all politicians she is no stranger to “massaging” and exaggerating the truth. And yes on occasion she will let loose a whopper. But is she worse than other politicians? The evidence suggests that she is no worse, and actually better, than most other politicians. Internet videos like the “13 minutes of Hillary lying” appear to be mostly examples of Hillary changing her position over several decades, combined with annoying but typical political behavior. But similar videos of Donald Trump exist showing him doing an even more extreme version of the same thing. Why is he not being accused of this type of mendacity? In fact, there is very little dispute that Trump has been SIGNIFICANTLY less honest on the campaign trail than Hillary. According to Politifact he is in fact the least honest candidate they’ve ever analyzed! So if the issue of honesty is really that important, why are so many people holding Hillary to such an obviously different standard than Trump?

The latest attack on Hillary's honesty concerns the email investigation. Although the Director of FBI testified to the fact that he found no evidence of Hillary lying, her opposition has maintains otherwise claiming Hillary lied to FBI and lied to congress. I think anyone with an once of intelligence would realize that if there were any evidence of Hillary lying under oath, she would be facing charges of contempt of this Republican Congress or arrested for making false statements to the FBI.

Bullshit!!! More lies from a libtard.

Any actual argument, brainwashed functional moron? Change the channel, stupid.

 

[francoHFW]

[

Any actual argument, ignorant hater dupe? Brainwashing is so sad to see...The whole gd New BS GOP...

You are confused.

I am not a Republican you nitwit. I have told you that several times but you have a poor attention span. Learn to listen better. No wonder you are a Libtard.

You stupid Moon Bats hate Trump with a passion because he is running against your shithead candidate so you can take your comments on hate and cram it up your Libtard ass.

Crooked Hillary is the most corrupt, incompetent and dishonest candidate to ever run for President of the US and no amount of denial like what was posted in that ridiculous article will not change that.

She is scum and you are an idiot for trying to support a low life bitch like that.

Thanks for proving my point, hater dupe. Your "feelings" are based on 25 years of total GOP bs. see sig. Memorize it and you might start making sense.