Hillary Clinton: Unfit for Office

[DarkFury]

To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.

Hillary broke the Law.

The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.

she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.

The law dealing with tampering with evidence has been around longer then Hillary. SoS does NOT have it's own laws and Hillary is held to the SAME laws and standards as any U.S. citizen DESPITE what SHE thinks or says.

I'm not a Hillary fan, but I have not seen any reputable site saying she broke laws.

Back in the 70s, I was really anti-Nixon, but only because he seemed intent on keeping that war going until I was of draft age. But, over the years, I've come to think that in actual accomplishment terms, and challenges his admin faced terms, he looks pretty damn good compared to any post-WWII potus. He was not personally a crook in terms of taking money for personal gain, and frankly I don't think the Clintons are either.

I'd prefer the Ohio Governor, but .... Hilary beats a clown.

Nixon never sought to screw his country ONLY democrats. Many of the laws Hillary DID break were written BECAUSE of Nixon.
If she cleaned that server AFTER the investigation was started last year she DID tamper.

 

[bendog]

To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.

Hillary broke the Law.

The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.

she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.

The law dealing with tampering with evidence has been around longer then Hillary. SoS does NOT have it's own laws and Hillary is held to the SAME laws and standards as any U.S. citizen DESPITE what SHE thinks or says.

I'm not a Hillary fan, but I have not seen any reputable site saying she broke laws.

Back in the 70s, I was really anti-Nixon, but only because he seemed intent on keeping that war going until I was of draft age. But, over the years, I've come to think that in actual accomplishment terms, and challenges his admin faced terms, he looks pretty damn good compared to any post-WWII potus. He was not personally a crook in terms of taking money for personal gain, and frankly I don't think the Clintons are either.

I'd prefer the Ohio Governor, but .... Hilary beats a clown.

Nixon never sought to screw his country ONLY democrats. Many of the laws Hillary DID break were written BECAUSE of Nixon.
If she cleaned that server AFTER the investigation was started last year she DID tamper.

You're really clarifying the laws you think Hillary broke.

 

[Kondor3]

To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.

Hillary broke the Law.

The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.

she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.

The law dealing with tampering with evidence has been around longer then Hillary. SoS does NOT have it's own laws and Hillary is held to the SAME laws and standards as any U.S. citizen DESPITE what SHE thinks or says.

I'm not a Hillary fan, but I have not seen any reputable site saying she broke laws.

Back in the 70s, I was really anti-Nixon, but only because he seemed intent on keeping that war going until I was of draft age. But, over the years, I've come to think that in actual accomplishment terms, and challenges his admin faced terms, he looks pretty damn good compared to any post-WWII potus. He was not personally a crook in terms of taking money for personal gain, and frankly I don't think the Clintons are either.

I'd prefer the Ohio Governor, but .... Hilary beats a clown.

Nixon never sought to screw his country ONLY democrats. Many of the laws Hillary DID break were written BECAUSE of Nixon.
If she cleaned that server AFTER the investigation was started last year she DID tamper.

You're really clarifying the laws you think Hillary broke.

Do you think he's on the right track?

 

[DarkFury]

To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.

Hillary broke the Law.

The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.

she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.

The law dealing with tampering with evidence has been around longer then Hillary. SoS does NOT have it's own laws and Hillary is held to the SAME laws and standards as any U.S. citizen DESPITE what SHE thinks or says.

I'm not a Hillary fan, but I have not seen any reputable site saying she broke laws.

Back in the 70s, I was really anti-Nixon, but only because he seemed intent on keeping that war going until I was of draft age. But, over the years, I've come to think that in actual accomplishment terms, and challenges his admin faced terms, he looks pretty damn good compared to any post-WWII potus. He was not personally a crook in terms of taking money for personal gain, and frankly I don't think the Clintons are either.

I'd prefer the Ohio Governor, but .... Hilary beats a clown.

Nixon never sought to screw his country ONLY democrats. Many of the laws Hillary DID break were written BECAUSE of Nixon.
If she cleaned that server AFTER the investigation was started last year she DID tamper.

You're really clarifying the laws you think Hillary broke.

One needs to know who cleaned that server and when first.

 

[chikenwing]

yeah she's unfit for office... so when she wins that won't be saying much for the Republitards will it?

beat two times in a row by a guy from Kenya, and pretty soon by a woman who is unfit for office .. that must really suck.

LMAO

LOL well you do like to dream.
Says much about you,willing to support some one like Clinton,says so much.
She will never be president of the US,her fan club maybe,but not the US.

 

[boedicca]

I basically agree with the OP, and I am strictly anti-conservative. But I've always viewed the Clintons as professional neo-con politicians.

The Clintons are Grifters. Why ANYONE who cares about America would want them in office is beyond explanation.

Well, the "caring about America" comment is rhetorial gibberish, since "America" is defined quitely widely and variously. Some very powerful people still model American labor based upon slaveholder rights.

Aaaand the moron went to the slavery card.

They were freed in 1865. Maybe you did not learn that in school.

Such a Red Herring. Our values and system of government led to the abolition of slavery. I'll note that slavery is still practiced in large swathes of the world. Where is the hysteria over that?

 

[The Rabbi]

How can anyone, liberal or conservative, defend Hillary's actions with regard to her server? First she maintained a private server for her emails against gov't regulations. Then she did not turn over the emails to State when she left, again in violation of the rules. Then she gave a news conference and lied about it, maintaining she didnt want to have two devices. Not only did she run two email accounts on one device, it came out she had a second one anyway. Now it turns out she probably deleted emails AFTER a House committee notified her they were investigating.
This is nothing other than obstruction of justice and evidence tampering. If she has so little regard for law now, and has had a 40 year history of such behavior, how can anyone support her for President?

Doesn't impact me one way or the other.

By that token you shouldnt be posting here at all since 99% of what we discuss doesnt impact you.
You arent disturbed that the front runner for the Dem nomination is basically a criminal?

I meant it doesn't matter to me. It's a non-issue. Certainly not a criminal issue by any stretch of the term. At the very most, she violated some internal department rules. I would think the Sec of State has more important things to do than read the SOPs on emails. So it bothers me not even a tiny bit.

Really? Obstructon of justice, a key point in Nixon's impeachment btw, doesnt really matter to you? Is there anything Hillary could do that you think would render her unfit to be the nominee?

I see no evidence of that. But no, I see nothing which renders her unfit to be the nominee. If that is who the Dems want to run, they should run her. That's how the process works. Hopefully the Republicans will run someone who can beat her. Though I am not encouraged by the crop so far.

You dont think outright lying, as she did in the news conference, renders someone unfit? I am curious if there is anything you would consider a disqualifier.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

She's unfit to be dogcatcher.

 

[boedicca]

Doesn't impact me one way or the other.

By that token you shouldnt be posting here at all since 99% of what we discuss doesnt impact you.
You arent disturbed that the front runner for the Dem nomination is basically a criminal?

I meant it doesn't matter to me. It's a non-issue. Certainly not a criminal issue by any stretch of the term. At the very most, she violated some internal department rules. I would think the Sec of State has more important things to do than read the SOPs on emails. So it bothers me not even a tiny bit.

Really? Obstructon of justice, a key point in Nixon's impeachment btw, doesnt really matter to you? Is there anything Hillary could do that you think would render her unfit to be the nominee?

I see no evidence of that. But no, I see nothing which renders her unfit to be the nominee. If that is who the Dems want to run, they should run her. That's how the process works. Hopefully the Republicans will run someone who can beat her. Though I am not encouraged by the crop so far.

You dont think outright lying, as she did in the news conference, renders someone unfit? I am curious if there is anything you would consider a disqualifier.

It's not a crime when the Dems lie. Just ask Harry Reid about his Romney tax whopper.

 

[The Rabbi]

By that token you shouldnt be posting here at all since 99% of what we discuss doesnt impact you.
You arent disturbed that the front runner for the Dem nomination is basically a criminal?

I meant it doesn't matter to me. It's a non-issue. Certainly not a criminal issue by any stretch of the term. At the very most, she violated some internal department rules. I would think the Sec of State has more important things to do than read the SOPs on emails. So it bothers me not even a tiny bit.

Really? Obstructon of justice, a key point in Nixon's impeachment btw, doesnt really matter to you? Is there anything Hillary could do that you think would render her unfit to be the nominee?

I see no evidence of that. But no, I see nothing which renders her unfit to be the nominee. If that is who the Dems want to run, they should run her. That's how the process works. Hopefully the Republicans will run someone who can beat her. Though I am not encouraged by the crop so far.

You dont think outright lying, as she did in the news conference, renders someone unfit? I am curious if there is anything you would consider a disqualifier.

It's not a crime when the Dems lie. Just ask Harry Reid about his Romney tax whopper.

Yes. When Republicans lie it's because they are flaming hypocrites who hate women and puppies. When Democrats lie it's because they all do it.

 

[boedicca]

I meant it doesn't matter to me. It's a non-issue. Certainly not a criminal issue by any stretch of the term. At the very most, she violated some internal department rules. I would think the Sec of State has more important things to do than read the SOPs on emails. So it bothers me not even a tiny bit.

Really? Obstructon of justice, a key point in Nixon's impeachment btw, doesnt really matter to you? Is there anything Hillary could do that you think would render her unfit to be the nominee?

I see no evidence of that. But no, I see nothing which renders her unfit to be the nominee. If that is who the Dems want to run, they should run her. That's how the process works. Hopefully the Republicans will run someone who can beat her. Though I am not encouraged by the crop so far.

You dont think outright lying, as she did in the news conference, renders someone unfit? I am curious if there is anything you would consider a disqualifier.

It's not a crime when the Dems lie. Just ask Harry Reid about his Romney tax whopper.

Yes. When Republicans lie it's because they are flaming hypocrites who hate women and puppies. When Democrats lie it's because they all do it.

And because THEY WON by lying, so it doesn't matter.

 

[Siete]

the right will still be bitching about Hillary being unfit for office and Benghazi when she is finishing up her second term as POTUS ... but they'll never figure out why or how she won and they got beat ... and NEVER will either,

ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh ...

 

[The Rabbi]

the right will still be bitching about Hillary being unfit for office and Benghazi when she is finishing up her second term as POTUS ... but they'll never figure out why or how she won and they got beat ... and NEVER will either,

ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh ...

Kewl story, bro.
Meanwhile Pres Cruz will cause half the Hollywood celebs to flee America for North Korea.

 

[boedicca]

the right will still be bitching about Hillary being unfit for office and Benghazi when she is finishing up her second term as POTUS ... but they'll never figure out why or how she won and they got beat ... and NEVER will either,

ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh ...

Your stupid must really hurt.

 

[Siete]

the right will still be bitching about Hillary being unfit for office and Benghazi when she is finishing up her second term as POTUS ... but they'll never figure out why or how she won and they got beat ... and NEVER will either,

ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh ...

Your stupid must really hurt.

the right will still be bitching about Hillary being unfit for office and Benghazi when she is finishing up her second term as POTUS ... but they'll never figure out why or how she won and they got beat ... and NEVER will either,

ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh ...

Your stupid must really hurt.

yeah, yer killin' me !

 

[PratchettFan]

Doesn't impact me one way or the other.

By that token you shouldnt be posting here at all since 99% of what we discuss doesnt impact you.
You arent disturbed that the front runner for the Dem nomination is basically a criminal?

I meant it doesn't matter to me. It's a non-issue. Certainly not a criminal issue by any stretch of the term. At the very most, she violated some internal department rules. I would think the Sec of State has more important things to do than read the SOPs on emails. So it bothers me not even a tiny bit.

Really? Obstructon of justice, a key point in Nixon's impeachment btw, doesnt really matter to you? Is there anything Hillary could do that you think would render her unfit to be the nominee?

I see no evidence of that. But no, I see nothing which renders her unfit to be the nominee. If that is who the Dems want to run, they should run her. That's how the process works. Hopefully the Republicans will run someone who can beat her. Though I am not encouraged by the crop so far.

You dont think outright lying, as she did in the news conference, renders someone unfit? I am curious if there is anything you would consider a disqualifier.

Well, let me think. Under the age of 45. Not a natural born citizen. Dead. I think that's about it. In fact, I don't think living is a requirement under the Constitution but it's probably a given. Certainly a completely unproven allegation of wrong doing doesn't do it. But do let me know if and when she is convicted. That would certainly impact whether or not I would vote for her - though it still wouldn't disqualify her.

 

[PratchettFan]

the right will still be bitching about Hillary being unfit for office and Benghazi when she is finishing up her second term as POTUS ... but they'll never figure out why or how she won and they got beat ... and NEVER will either,

ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh ...

Kewl story, bro.
Meanwhile Pres Cruz will cause half the Hollywood celebs to flee America for North Korea.

If Cruz is the nominee the next President will be a Democrat pretty much no matter who they run. His following may be loyal, but it is small and he burned just about every bridge he could burn pulling it together. On the national stage, he is unelectable.

 

[bendog]

and this.

Hillary Clinton Makes It Hard to Follow the Money - NationalJournal.com

 

[Kondor3]

the right will still be bitching about Hillary being unfit for office and Benghazi when she is finishing up her second term as POTUS ... but they'll never figure out why or how she won and they got beat ... and NEVER will either,

ssssssshhhhhhhhhhh ...

God bless Hillary supporters for their arrogance and overconfidence... just what the doctor ordered.

 

[The Rabbi]

By that token you shouldnt be posting here at all since 99% of what we discuss doesnt impact you.
You arent disturbed that the front runner for the Dem nomination is basically a criminal?

I meant it doesn't matter to me. It's a non-issue. Certainly not a criminal issue by any stretch of the term. At the very most, she violated some internal department rules. I would think the Sec of State has more important things to do than read the SOPs on emails. So it bothers me not even a tiny bit.

Really? Obstructon of justice, a key point in Nixon's impeachment btw, doesnt really matter to you? Is there anything Hillary could do that you think would render her unfit to be the nominee?

I see no evidence of that. But no, I see nothing which renders her unfit to be the nominee. If that is who the Dems want to run, they should run her. That's how the process works. Hopefully the Republicans will run someone who can beat her. Though I am not encouraged by the crop so far.

You dont think outright lying, as she did in the news conference, renders someone unfit? I am curious if there is anything you would consider a disqualifier.

Well, let me think. Under the age of 45. Not a natural born citizen. Dead. I think that's about it. In fact, I don't think living is a requirement under the Constitution but it's probably a given. Certainly a completely unproven allegation of wrong doing doesn't do it. But do let me know if and when she is convicted. That would certainly impact whether or not I would vote for her - though it still wouldn't disqualify her.

OK, I'll keep that in mind the next time you weigh in on a GOP candidate.