It's amusing (to me) to see the "shock and disappointment" in Hillary being secretive. LOL Cheney tried to keep secret Enron's role in writing energy policy by cooking the books on WH visitors, but he was a mere piker compared to the Clintons.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A law that she broke, passed after she was gone? Care to clear that up for us?To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.
Hillary broke the Law.
The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.
she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.
I'm no HRC fan but yeah, that would be fun/funnyyeah she's unfit for office... so when she wins that won't be saying much for the Republitards will it?
beat two times in a row by a guy from Kenya, and pretty soon by a woman who is unfit for office .. that must really suck.
LMAO
Did Cheny violate any laws or regulations with regard to keeping emails or other records? If so provide proof.It's amusing (to me) to see the "shock and disappointment" in Hillary being secretive. LOL Cheney tried to keep secret Enron's role in writing energy policy by cooking the books on WH visitors, but he was a mere piker compared to the Clintons.
By that token you shouldnt be posting here at all since 99% of what we discuss doesnt impact you.How can anyone, liberal or conservative, defend Hillary's actions with regard to her server? First she maintained a private server for her emails against gov't regulations. Then she did not turn over the emails to State when she left, again in violation of the rules. Then she gave a news conference and lied about it, maintaining she didnt want to have two devices. Not only did she run two email accounts on one device, it came out she had a second one anyway. Now it turns out she probably deleted emails AFTER a House committee notified her they were investigating.
This is nothing other than obstruction of justice and evidence tampering. If she has so little regard for law now, and has had a 40 year history of such behavior, how can anyone support her for President?
Doesn't impact me one way or the other.
You arent disturbed that the front runner for the Dem nomination is basically a criminal?
A law that she broke, passed after she was gone? Care to clear that up for us?To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.
Hillary broke the Law.
The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.
she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.
Really? Obstructon of justice, a key point in Nixon's impeachment btw, doesnt really matter to you? Is there anything Hillary could do that you think would render her unfit to be the nominee?By that token you shouldnt be posting here at all since 99% of what we discuss doesnt impact you.How can anyone, liberal or conservative, defend Hillary's actions with regard to her server? First she maintained a private server for her emails against gov't regulations. Then she did not turn over the emails to State when she left, again in violation of the rules. Then she gave a news conference and lied about it, maintaining she didnt want to have two devices. Not only did she run two email accounts on one device, it came out she had a second one anyway. Now it turns out she probably deleted emails AFTER a House committee notified her they were investigating.
This is nothing other than obstruction of justice and evidence tampering. If she has so little regard for law now, and has had a 40 year history of such behavior, how can anyone support her for President?
Doesn't impact me one way or the other.
You arent disturbed that the front runner for the Dem nomination is basically a criminal?
I meant it doesn't matter to me. It's a non-issue. Certainly not a criminal issue by any stretch of the term. At the very most, she violated some internal department rules. I would think the Sec of State has more important things to do than read the SOPs on emails. So it bothers me not even a tiny bit.
The law dealing with tampering with evidence has been around longer then Hillary. SoS does NOT have it's own laws and Hillary is held to the SAME laws and standards as any U.S. citizen DESPITE what SHE thinks or says.To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.
Hillary broke the Law.
The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.
she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.
SimpleA law that she broke, passed after she was gone? Care to clear that up for us?To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.
Hillary broke the Law.
The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.
she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.
Really? Obstructon of justice, a key point in Nixon's impeachment btw, doesnt really matter to you? Is there anything Hillary could do that you think would render her unfit to be the nominee?By that token you shouldnt be posting here at all since 99% of what we discuss doesnt impact you.How can anyone, liberal or conservative, defend Hillary's actions with regard to her server? First she maintained a private server for her emails against gov't regulations. Then she did not turn over the emails to State when she left, again in violation of the rules. Then she gave a news conference and lied about it, maintaining she didnt want to have two devices. Not only did she run two email accounts on one device, it came out she had a second one anyway. Now it turns out she probably deleted emails AFTER a House committee notified her they were investigating.
This is nothing other than obstruction of justice and evidence tampering. If she has so little regard for law now, and has had a 40 year history of such behavior, how can anyone support her for President?
Doesn't impact me one way or the other.
You arent disturbed that the front runner for the Dem nomination is basically a criminal?
I meant it doesn't matter to me. It's a non-issue. Certainly not a criminal issue by any stretch of the term. At the very most, she violated some internal department rules. I would think the Sec of State has more important things to do than read the SOPs on emails. So it bothers me not even a tiny bit.
Well, the "caring about America" comment is rhetorial gibberish, since "America" is defined quitely widely and variously. Some very powerful people still model American labor based upon slaveholder rights.I basically agree with the OP, and I am strictly anti-conservative. But I've always viewed the Clintons as professional neo-con politicians.
The Clintons are Grifters. Why ANYONE who cares about America would want them in office is beyond explanation.
I'm not a Hillary fan, but I have not seen any reputable site saying she broke laws.The law dealing with tampering with evidence has been around longer then Hillary. SoS does NOT have it's own laws and Hillary is held to the SAME laws and standards as any U.S. citizen DESPITE what SHE thinks or says.To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.
Hillary broke the Law.
The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.
she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.
And now, instead of the "Missing 18 Minutes", we have the "Missing 18 Months"... not good.Nixon didn't burn all of his tapes....
Just sayin'.
Well, you have a rather serious problem, since the emails were turned over, regardless of how and why, even if untimely, what you now have to prove is that something that should have been turned over wasn't, and that it was wiped “willfully and unlawfully”.SimpleA law that she broke, passed after she was gone? Care to clear that up for us?To say she broke a rule you first have to prove that she did, which so far, no one can. Start there please.
Hillary broke the Law.
The Law that was introduced by a House Republican, passed by Congress and signed by the POTUS ... 2 YEARS AFTER SHE LEFT OFFICE.
she didn't get caught speeding in 2013 either.
National Review
Now, are you going for the moron's default of "It's National Review, what do you expect?" Or are you going to admit she probably committed a felony?
LMAO, that someone with a long and well-documented track record for involvement in corruption scandals, and strong-arming, and, now, obstruction of justice, and, perhaps, contempt of Congress, has attained the highest office in the land?yeah she's unfit for office... so when she wins that won't be saying much for the Republitards will it?
beat two times in a row by a guy from Kenya, and pretty soon by a woman who is unfit for office .. that must really suck.
LMAO
Is this STILL about: