Hillary Clinton Re-emerges...Setting Ground Work for Her Return?

Is Clinton talking about fake votes?

Is she talking about Dominion machines changing counts?

Is she talking about election workers counting fake ballots from China?

Is she talking about voters not being able to have confidence that their vote was counted? That it wasn't over-ridden by fake ballot dumps.

NO. That's not what she is talking about, only Trump is talking about that and you fools are to chicken shit to admit that.

Nearly 5 years later Hillary Clinton pops up, appears on world-wide television, relives the pain and anguish of her rejectionbytge American people by reading her 'what could have been' 'victory' speech that no one but her cares to hear, and weeps like am spoiled, rich, 'Its My Turn', elitist bitch while continuing to blame everyone but herself for her loss, proving she gas not moved on but is instead trapped in 2016...

The fact that the very same Democrats who failed in 5 straight Years of attempting to 'get Trump' are STILL trying to do so, after he beat them all at every turn for 4 years, just proves Democrats are STILL suffering from TDS and, like Hillary, have STILL not moved on....

Even though the Democrats control the WH, House, & Senate....

That's because they are STILL afraid of him and STILL consider him a serious threat to them...

...for good reason.....

Biden has single handedly already handed the GOP the House & Senate in 2022 and the Presidency in 2024.

:p
 
Mueller report documented extensive Russian campaign to help Trump win 2016 election against Clinton. Their (successful) efforts added up to stealing and publicizing private documents and running targeted social media propaganda in battleground states.

As I've already said, these illegal electioneering efforts CAN'T be quantified in terms of how many minds they changed. Thats not a knowable, so Clinton's statements are rhetoric, not fact. But the implication for our democracy of these efforts by Russians is drastically different from widespread voting fraud Trump keeps baselessly claiming.

No one is going to doubt their vote counting and/or attack the Congress because Russians and Comey were giving Clinton bad publicity.
Keep pushing that Russian Troll propaganda, comrade. Mueller provided a report clearing Trump, making it impossible for Democrats to remove him from office.

Since then the whole Hillary-Obama failed coup has been completely exposed.


You and your debunked lies / conspiracy theories are a complete joke.
 
Nearly 5 years later Hillary Clinton pops up, appears on world-wide television, relives the pain and anguish of her rejectionbytge American people by reading her 'what could have been' 'victory' speech that no one but her cares to hear, and weeps like am spoiled, rich, 'Its My Turn', elitist bitch while continuing to blame everyone but herself for her loss, proving she gas not moved on but is instead trapped in 2016...

The fact that the very same Democrats who failed in 5 straight Years of attempting to 'get Trump' are STILL trying to do so, after he beat them all at every turn for 4 years, just proves Democrats are STILL suffering from TDS and, like Hillary, have STILL not moved on....

Even though the Democrats control the WH, House, & Senate....

That's because they are STILL afraid of him and STILL consider him a serious threat to them...

...for good reason.....

Biden has single handedly already handed the GOP the House & Senate in 2022 and the Presidency in 2024.

:p
Cool story bruh, but it would be nice if you ACTUALLY addressed something in what you quoted.
 
Keep pushing that Russian Troll propaganda, comrade. Mueller provided a report clearing Trump,
Bait and switch. Your two best friends it seems.

Mueller described Russian campaign to help Trump and he described Trump and his people doing a lot of pussy-footing with Russians and lying about it, even if he didn't find evidence that it rose to the level of criminal conspiracy.

But this needs to be understood from perspective of WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR OUR DEMOCRACY? Even if Trump did criminally collude with Russians, it would still add up to just illicit electioneering with unclear effects on public opinion. It would not be voting fraud and it would still leave public confidence in election administration well intact.
 
Last edited:
No one is going to doubt their vote counting and/or attack the Congress because Russians and Comey were giving Clinton bad publicity.
James Comey gave Hillary Clinton a get out of jail free card when he declined to prosecute her
when she lied to the FBI about her personal servers she used during her time at the State Department.

Did he cost her the election, like you keep claiming, without substantiation?

Or did he keep her from jail or other serious deserved penalties when he stated Clinton did not "intend"
to break the law and even if she did he would not have prosecuted her.

What does that sound like to any reasonable mind?

Claiming Comey is guilty of giving "bad publicity" to Clinton is like saying the FBI smeared Bonnie and Clyde
when the two were gunned down.

You can't see how asinine you seem?
 
Bait and switch. Your two best friends it seems.

Mueller described Russian campaign to help Trump and he described Trump and his people doing a lot of pussy-footing with Russians and lying about it, even if he didn't find evidence that it rose to the level of criminal conspiracy.
Why not cite that? Claiming Mueller found links between Russian agents and Trump but they didn't
amount to anything serious or objectionable is damning your own claims as inconsequential.

Do you see how stupid that makes you seem by your own claims?
 
Why not cite that? Claiming Mueller found links between Russian agents and Trump but they didn't
amount to anything serious or objectionable is damning your own claims as inconsequential.

Do you see how stupid that makes you seem by your own claims?

They didn't find CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. They certainly found alot of un-patriotic, sleazy, deceitful, highly objectionable behavior.

The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”
  • In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5] Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.
  • Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6]
  • Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8]
  • The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering.
  • The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election.
  • The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]
 
Last edited:
Mueller report documented extensive Russian campaign to help Trump win 2016 election against Clinton. Their (successful) efforts added up to stealing and publicizing private documents and running targeted social media propaganda in battleground states.

As I've already said, these illegal electioneering efforts CAN'T be quantified in terms of effects on public opinion. Thats not a knowable, so Clinton's statements are rhetoric, not fact. But the implication for our democracy of these efforts by Russians is drastically different from widespread voting fraud Trump keeps baselessly claiming.

No one is going to doubt their vote counting and/or attack the Congress because Russians and Comey were giving Clinton bad publicity.
I could say the same thing 1,000 times over simply by citing how leftist "news" sites used their
supposed moral authority and influence to smear Donald Trump or any conservative figure
for that matter.
In public places like airports, bars, in classrooms, in homes, etc. CNN and MSNBC as well as ABC, CBS, NBC
it's a commonly accepted fact that the left has had a free hand to slur, smear and distort reality all in
favor of the DNC and their candidates.

Your pitiful grumbling and bellyaching just shows what an out of touch moron you are.
 
They didn't find CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. They certainly found alot of un-patriotic, sleasy, decietful, objectionable behavior.

Sure, why not?

The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”

  • In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5] Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.
  • Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6]
  • Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8]
  • The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering.
  • The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election.
  • The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]
AND YET you yourself freely admit there is absolutely nothing you can point to that is
actionable or illegal about any of this and Robert Mueller agrees.
This "suggests" something. That "raised questions" etc.
You are fine combing through yesterday's cat litter trying to pull out something of consequence.
That's what makes you so pitiful.
 
James Comey gave Hillary Clinton a get out of jail free card when he declined to prosecute her
when she lied to the FBI about her personal servers she used during her time at the State Department.

Trump's DOJ 2018 Inspector General report on the Clinton investigation says you are dead wrong.


It found that the case was concluded apropriately and that Comey violated DOJ policy when he went out and provided derogatory statements about Clinton without any charges in the middle of a campaign. Comey's firing letter says the same thing.

 
Last edited:
AND YET you yourself freely admit there is absolutely nothing you can point to that is
actionable or illegal about any of this and Robert Mueller agrees.
This "suggests" something. That "raised questions" etc.
You are fine combing through yesterday's cat litter trying to pull out something of consequence.
That's what makes you so pitiful.

Ok, AGAIN Trump's relationship with Russians is beside the point , EVEN IF criminal conspiracy would be true it still does not mean there was voter fraud, or that it actually changed outcome of 2016 election. EVEN IF TRUE, Clinton's claims that election was definetly stolen remain rhetoric not fact, because the effects on public opinion from all this illicit electioneering is not a knowable.

It would just mean Trump would be removed from presidency and have a lot more legal problems. But his problems aside it has little bearing on public trust in the actual administration of American elections.
 
It found that the case was concluded apropriately and that Comey violated DOJ policy when he went out and provided derogatory statements about Clinton without any charges in the middle of a campaign.
I absolutely agree! James Comey SHOULD HAVE charged Clinton with lying to the FBI and his refusal to do so, saying he (Comey) would not have charged Madame Clinton with lying to the FBI even if he believed she did
lie
(which he says she did) was a disgraceful act of corrupt dereliction of duty for which both Clinton AND
Comey should have been sent to jail.
 
EVEN IF TRUE, Clinton's claims that election was definetly stolen remain rhetoric not fact, because the effects on public opinion from all this illicit electioneering is not a knowable.
So Clinton is jabbering unknowable blather based on her biased beliefs. So why is anyone paying attention
to this bitter alcoholic cyst on the ass of democracy?

Her attempts to drum up a comeback is pointless and people don't care about water that long ago
flowed under the bridge.
 
I absolutely agree! James Comey SHOULD HAVE charged Clinton with lying to the FBI and his refusal to do so, saying he (Comey) would not have charged Madame Clinton with lying to the FBI even if he believed she did
lie
(which he says she did) was a disgraceful act of corrupt dereliction of duty for which both Clinton AND
Comey should have been sent to jail.
?? I don't know where you get this half-baked stuff but it's certainly not from IG report.

Comey's improper public deregatory statements were not about perjury, they were about Clinton mishandling emails.

You can't send people to jail for violating department policy, there has to be unlawful conduct.

And what is it you think Clinton lied to FBI about?
 
Last edited:
So Clinton is jabbering unknowable blather based on her biased beliefs. So why is anyone paying attention
to this bitter alcoholic cyst on the ass of democracy?

Her attempts to drum up a comeback is pointless and people don't care about water that long ago
flowed under the bridge.
You keep talking about Clinton the person, I'm talking about America and implications for our democracy.

We are not on the same page here.
 
?? I don't know where you get this half-baked stuff but it's certainly not from IG report.

You can't send people to jail for violating department policy, there has to be unlawful conduct.

What is it you think Clinton lied to FBI about?
If anyone lied about links to Russia in 2016 it was the Clinton campaign.
I'm not going to reinvent the wheel when it comes to Trump and Clinton
except to say Hillary is the one who smeared Trump using Russian and British
sources, such as Anthony Steele with his lies.

Hillary's Perkins-Coie lawyer is in deep doo doo.
 
If anyone lied about links to Russia in 2016 it was the Clinton campaign.
I'm not going to reinvent the wheel when it comes to Trump and Clinton
except to say Hillary is the one who smeared Trump using Russian and British
sources, such as Anthony Steele with his lies.

Hillary's Perkins-Coie lawyer is in deep doo doo.
...? You said Clinton lied to FBI, but are now posting about some guy she may never even met in her life.

What the hell are you talking about?
 

Forum List

Back
Top