Hillary Clinton may be using Richard Nixon playbook.

[Statistikhengst]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/20/u...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

That sounds strange, but could be true. Tricky Dick had to remake himself to win the White House. Hillary may be attempting the same.

Richard Nixon was a smart accomplished politician with a long record of public service.
Hillary Clinton is a shrill lying bitch with a name and a vagina.
The comparison is odious.

Sexist.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[The Rabbi]

Stupid thread, she's not answering questions because she doesn't have the answers. Now with the new Benghazi revelations we may not see the old bitch for months

She is trying to micromanage this campaign so cannot afford reporters' questions that havent been fully vetted. She is reduced to discussing cookie recipes and how she loves her grandson.

I read today her daughter is impossible to work for also, people leaving the Foundation in droves, the apple doesn't fall far

Jimmy Carter had the appearance of being likeable. Hillary doesnt even have that.

 

[hortysir]

They are both crooks and liars, so it makes sense.

I'll stipulated to that -- But.....

Nixon was the last of the Imperial Presidents. Up to Nixon, the US President was all but the King in name only. His word was law, he faced no opposition.

Nixon acted accordingly. And wrongly. He should have know the times were changing, that people had been badly burned by LBJ and JFK and they just didn't want an unfettered President.

Hitlery is another story altogether. So is the dimocrap party.

Nixon only PROPOSED that the IRS go after his enemies and that was enough (among other things) to get before an impeachment hearing.

obama DID IT. And -- Nothing.

Nixon was a choir boy compared to modern dimocraps.

Mumbly and company will leave this post ignored.

 

[Edgetho]

Jimmy Carter had the appearance of being likeable. Hillary doesnt even have that.

Jimmy Carter was the last of the liberals in the democrat party. There aren't any more. They're all radical scum.

Like everything else that liberals try, the radicals move in and take over, killing whatever it was that liberals were trying to accomplish. Burying it under a pile of redistributionist nonsense and socialist trash.

liberals who think the dimocrap party still represents them are delusional.

liberalism is dead.

 

[JimH52]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/20/u...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

That sounds strange, but could be true. Tricky Dick had to remake himself to win the White House. Hillary may be attempting the same.

Richard Nixon was a smart accomplished politician with a long record of public service.
Hillary Clinton is a shrill lying bitch with a name and a vagina.
The comparison is odious.

Sexist.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

It is a GOP requirement to be sexist along with racist and gullible. I think it is mentioned in their platform.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Also a factor in W's re-election. Like Nixon, most knew he was corrupt and incompetent but his name was well known.

"Jeb Bush has his famous last name as a calling card, for better or worse. But Scott Walker’s name does not ring many bells outside Wisconsin.

Ted Cruz is not even well known in Texas."

I just heard that as many as 20 Repubs will be running - most of whom are relatively unknown.

LOL! Where do you make this stuff up?

The quote is from the article posted in the OP.



Nixon started corrupt and crooked and became more so over the years. He got into politics by answering a want ad and his first election was bought and paid for by Big Money of the time.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

 

[orogenicman]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

 

[The Rabbi]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/20/u...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

That sounds strange, but could be true. Tricky Dick had to remake himself to win the White House. Hillary may be attempting the same.

Richard Nixon was a smart accomplished politician with a long record of public service.
Hillary Clinton is a shrill lying bitch with a name and a vagina.
The comparison is odious.

Sexist.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

It is a GOP requirement to be sexist along with racist and gullible. I think it is mentioned in their platform.

Democrats are the biggest sexists out there. Recall their heroes are Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd.

 

[The Rabbi]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

So how come we're losing?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

So how come we're losing?

We are?

EXACTLY what is the US "losing"?

I mean, you do know we're talking about ISIS, right?

 

[The Rabbi]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

So how come we're losing?

We are?

EXACTLY what is the US "losing"?

I mean, you do know we're talking about ISIS, right?

You're kidding me, right? ISIS took over Ramadi over the weekend. The US's bombing campaign and other measures are failing.
Islamic State Is Winning in Iraq - WSJ

 

[orogenicman]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

So how come we're losing?

Define how we are losing.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Strange bedfellows.

But some interesting thoughts:

Not since Richard M. Nixon mounted a comeback in 1968, historians and pollsters say, has a candidate entered a presidential contest with so low a bar for name recognition or so high a bar for changing voters’ opinions.

The campaign playbooks of Nixon and Mrs. Clinton seem to share some pages.

Nixon strove to show a more casual side by bypassing journalists and staging town-hall-style events — orchestrated by his media consultant, Roger Ailes — at theaters across the country packed with friendly audiences. Taking softball questions, he kept to his talking points and struck television viewers as more relaxed than the sweaty man they remembered from his debates against John F. Kennedy in 1960.

“A lot of people who thought they’d made up their minds about him saw a different version,” said Kenneth L. Khachigian, a speechwriter for Nixon and later for Ronald Reagan. “That’s a prime example of someone who had a lot of perceived political baggage and who remade himself.”

Mrs. Clinton, too, has been ducking reporters and instead holding round-table discussions with carefully chosen voters in early voting states. (Aides say the questions those voters ask are not screened.) She has used the sessions to share lesser-known vignettes from her past: her mother’s impoverished upbringing; her middle-class childhood in Chicago; her work in the 1970s as an advocate for children; her juggling work and child rearing as a young lawyer in Arkansas.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

So how come we're losing?

Define how we are losing.

According to The Rabbi Rimadi is in the US.

 

[The Rabbi]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

So how come we're losing?

Define how we are losing.

According to The Rabbi Rimadi is in the US.

Are you going to admit that the US's efforts in Iraq have not produced anything resembling victory? Or are you going to continue with stupid statements that deflect from the argument?

 

[orogenicman]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

So how come we're losing?

Define how we are losing.

According to The Rabbi Rimadi is in the US.

Are you going to admit that the US's efforts in Iraq have not produced anything resembling victory? Or are you going to continue with stupid statements that deflect from the argument?

Define "victory".

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Its just that she has a mountain range of lies, deceit, and skeletons for all to see. Maybe she's trying some of that same lipstick that O used to dress himself up.

Ya can put lipstick on a pig, but....

I don't know, horty. They lipsticked O up for two terms.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Worth watching

Finally the USA attacks ISIS on the ground On Air Videos Fox News

Sadly, fox viewers don't know that we've been attacking ISIS, killed ISIS and that we have a coalition of 60 other countries following President Obama's lead.

So how come we're losing?

Define how we are losing.

According to The Rabbi Rimadi is in the US.

Are you going to admit that the US's efforts in Iraq have not produced anything resembling victory? Or are you going to continue with stupid statements that deflect from the argument?

Are you going to admit that you really don't give a large mouse's behind about any of it except as a way of criticizing our president?

What about the countries who are directly involved? How about you ask them why they have not wiped ISIS offf the planet?

 

[Jarhead]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/20/u...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

That sounds strange, but could be true. Tricky Dick had to remake himself to win the White House. Hillary may be attempting the same.

WOW! And the far left will still vote for her!

Nixon won didn't he? You posts threads on all types of shortcomings, but no link to support your "accusations." You post "maybes", "if", and "probably".

I find it funny. You guys on the left kicked and screamed about Bush being a liar and not transparent...and lectured the right about how such a person in the White House is bad for America

SO now you have a candidate who has been caught in several lies regarding her tenure in a very high government position. She is far from transparent....yet you still want to see her as president.

Why?