"Hide the Decline"...

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Sinatra, Nov 27, 2009.

  1. Sinatra
    Offline

    Sinatra Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,013
    Thanks Received:
    1,005
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,005
    Here is the actual temperature graph that INCLUDES the data that utilized the Mann "trick" to "hide the decline" as noted in the now infamous whistleblower climate emails.

    This thing is really starting to catch on now folks - I was disheartened by the media foot dragging, but the momentum is now initiating a decided shift in favor of truth, and against this global warming scame.

    And now for the chart - rather incredible...


    [​IMG]


    And here is the original Mann chart, with the utilized "trick", which was then regurgitated over and over again by the other climate "studies" articles (peer reviewed of course) government agencies, the media, etc...


    [​IMG]


    Anyone attempting to argue there was not widespread collusion among the global warmers to control the data and mislead the public, is practicing the same dishonesty as did Mann and his global warming ilk.

    Legal charges are forthcoming...


    McIntyre: The deleted data from the “Hide the Decline” trick « Watts Up With That?
     
  2. Sinatra
    Offline

    Sinatra Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,013
    Thanks Received:
    1,005
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,005
    Wall Street Journal editorial board slams the global warmers, while warning the hard-driven ideology of the current Democrat leadership might continue walking toward the abyss...

    __

    ...This scandal has real implications. Mr. Inhofe notes that international and U.S. efforts to regulate carbon were already on the ropes. The growing fear of Democrats and environmentalists is that the CRU uproar will prove a tipping point, and mark a permanent end to those ambitions.

    ...Polls show a public already losing belief in the theory of man-made global warming, and skeptics are now on the offense. The Competitive Enterprise Institute's Myron Ebell argues this scandal gives added cover to Blue Dogs and other Democrats who were already reluctant to buck the public's will and vote for climate legislation. And with Republicans set to pick up seats, Mr. Ebell adds, "By 2011 there will hopefully be even fewer members who support this. We may be close to having it permanently stymied." Continued U.S. failure to act makes an international agreement to replace Kyoto (which expires in 2012) a harder sell.

    ...Still, if this Democratic Washington has demonstrated anything, it's that ideology often trumps common sense. Egged on by the left, dug in to their position, Democrats might plow ahead. They'd be better off acknowledging that the only "consensus" right now is that the world needs to start over on climate "science."

    Full article here:


    RealClearPolitics - Will Climate Scandal Be a Tipping Point?
     
  3. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    And notice this from the article?

    "University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) that have found their way to the Internet have blown the lid off the "science" of manmade global warming. CRU is a nerve center for many of those researchers who have authored the United Nations' global warming reports and fueled the political movement to regulate carbon."

    I wonder what the U.N. has to say of this?
     
  4. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    Nevermind that WE are carbon beings to boot? This entire planet is based upon CARBON? :eusa_whistle:
     
  5. Sinatra
    Offline

    Sinatra Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,013
    Thanks Received:
    1,005
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,005
    Yup -been pointing that out for years.

    And a couple "natural" belch's from the earth produces more CO2 than all of humankind.

    This was an utter sham from the beginning.

    We can impact the environment - humans are far too insignificant to impact climate...
     
  6. JenyEliza
    Offline

    JenyEliza Princess of Rhetoric

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,046
    Thanks Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA, USA
    Ratings:
    +353
    They say "Where can we purchase our carbon credits, (Almost) President Gore?"

    THAT is what they say.....and they want YOU to say so also! :eusa_shhh:
     
  7. JenyEliza
    Offline

    JenyEliza Princess of Rhetoric

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,046
    Thanks Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA, USA
    Ratings:
    +353
    So where, OH WHERE, can I purchase my carbon credits to make up for this deficiency, dear sir? :eusa_shhh: :doubt:
     
  8. Sinatra
    Offline

    Sinatra Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,013
    Thanks Received:
    1,005
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,005


    Can't argue with the images folks - what utter crap this global warming scam has been...
     
  9. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,474
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,318
    No, you cannot be charged for your incredible gullibility and stupidy.

    For a long time you have been claiming that the warming is natural, man has nothing to do with it. Now you are again claiming that the warming is non-existant.

    So how is this non-existant warming melting the ice at both poles? How is it melting the glaciers on all continents?

    And you want to use James Watt as a referance? The fellow that thinks that lead, mercury, tobacco, and asbestos are harmless?
     
  10. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Ohh, I am dissapointed in this thread.
    From the title I fiugred it was about what Bush did to hide the economic decline.
     

Share This Page