Herman CAIN vs President UnABLE

I have already stated that I dont agree with his stances on what should be done in this country.

DUH!

I am a liberal dem.

You guys get to pick your person.

i jsut think Cain is the most capable person the right has looked at so far.
 
Democrats don't want an educated person as president, of ANY color. Mathmetician-Rocket Scientist Herman Cain, stands totally in opposition to the illiterate affirmative action president they have now.
 
Democrats don't want an educated person as president, of ANY color. Mathmetician-Rocket Scientist Herman Cain, stands totally in opposition to the illiterate affirmative action president they have now.

Why do you do this?

It serves NO purpose at all.

Obama has a top education and so does Cain.

Morehouse is a top flight school.

So is Harvard.

They both did well in college.

Why spew mindless lies for poltical purposes?
 

there may be some truth to that.. you know, in thinking back:

bush-expression_1016531i.jpg


sarah_palin.jpg
 
Now if I wass running arround telling lie about this perfectly qualified man in an attempt to ruin him THAT would be racism.

The man is fully qualified to be elected president.

He is about the brightest man the gop has looked at this time arround.

I would NEVER claim something stupid like he isnt a citizen and refuse his birth certificate.

If his father was born out of the country and he refused to prodcue a BC maybe you would have at least "questioned" it? If you did, was it becuase of his race?

I would NEVER claim he is a different religion than he claims.

If his father was of another religion and his name was derived from that religion, maybe you would question it? If you did , was it becuase of his race?

I would never force him to be responsible for the words other people he knows said.

Huh? Who said he was respoinsible for the words of another person? If he referred to a man as his mentor and that man had used questionable language against other people of different thinking than his own, would you not question why he would refer such a hateful man as a mentor? If you did, was it becuase of his race?

I would never call him things like a monarchist when he claims he is a conservitive republican and a capitalist.

No. You just like to use words like bimbo, idiot, liar, whacko wing nut, etc etc etc.

Those things would smack of racism.

He is a very bright and capable man and his cancer history is a non issue.

Other candidtaes are equally bright and capable. Cain has an ideology you continually refer to as the worst kind of thinking.

There is very good prospects for peopel who have had past cancer issues and he has premium health care and no doubt gets the proper testing to make sure any reoccurance is dealt with promptly.

I will fight anyone who tries to make this an issue.

Why? You make every little thing anyoine on the right as an issue of race.

Morehouse college produces some of the best and brightest this country has to offer.

I say Cain is your best choice so far.

Only becuase he is black. You are a racist

I also think it would be wonderful to see two bright and capable black men vie for this countries top spot.

A racist comment. I think it would be wonderful to see the two best candidates vie for this country regardless of race. Sadly, that will be impossible unless the democrats put someone up against Obama.

It would show the racissts in this country that what they want ( an America split by race) will never ever exsist.


Break , lets do it!

Yep. You are a racist.

You disgust me.
 
Democrats don't want an educated person as president, of ANY color. Mathmetician-Rocket Scientist Herman Cain, stands totally in opposition to the illiterate affirmative action president they have now.

Why do you do this?

It serves NO purpose at all.

Obama has a top education and so does Cain.

Morehouse is a top flight school.

So is Harvard.

They both did well in college.

Why spew mindless lies for poltical purposes?

Why do Democrats was to suppress voters?
Run from it all you want. Avoid the question, but people will continue to ask it.
 
Im a racist because I think Herman cain is bright and capable?

wow
 
Last edited:
Democrats don't want an educated person as president, of ANY color. Mathmetician-Rocket Scientist Herman Cain, stands totally in opposition to the illiterate affirmative action president they have now.

Why do you do this?

It serves NO purpose at all.

Obama has a top education and so does Cain.

Morehouse is a top flight school.

So is Harvard.

They both did well in college.

Why spew mindless lies for poltical purposes?

Why do Democrats was to suppress voters?
Run from it all you want. Avoid the question, but people will continue to ask it.

maybe you better go back to the thread in question.

I await your apology
 
Im a racist because I think hHerman cain is bright and capable?

wow

other candidates are bright and capable.

But you dont see them as bright and capable based on their ideologhy alone.

Cain has the same ideology, but you see him as bright and capable.

Therefore you see him as bright and capable based on his race seeing as you made a point about him being black.

Basic logic TM

You are a racist and you disgust me.
 
Im a racist because I think hHerman cain is bright and capable?

wow

No. You're a racist anyway.

Could you flesh out that claim and why you make it?

it has been popinted out to you many times in this thread.

TM...you screwed up. You admitted that his race is a facotr.

That does not make you a racist from a hate standpont.

It makes you racist from a biased standpoint.

You are biased to those that are black.

You are a racist.

You disgust me.
 
I wonder if Joe Biden thinks that Herman Cain is an articulate black man?

On another note, one thing to look forward to in a Cain/Obama debate is that Cain can call Obama on some of his socialist crap without the race card being thrown. Or at least one would hope.
 
Im a racist because I think hHerman cain is bright and capable?

wow

other candidates are bright and capable.

But you dont see them as bright and capable based on their ideologhy alone.

Cain has the same ideology, but you see him as bright and capable.

Therefore you see him as bright and capable based on his race seeing as you made a point about him being black.

Basic logic TM

You are a racist and you disgust me.


Yep :clap2:
 
Democrats don't want an educated person as president, of ANY color. Mathmetician-Rocket Scientist Herman Cain, stands totally in opposition to the illiterate affirmative action president they have now.

Why do you do this?

It serves NO purpose at all.

Obama has a top education and so does Cain.

Morehouse is a top flight school.

So is Harvard.

They both did well in college.

Why spew mindless lies for poltical purposes?

If obama did so well at Harvard, what were his grades? I'm willing to grant you that he did well, IF he could prove it. Cain took his education and became a ballistics expert for the Navy. Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review for one year, recognized in the legal field as being the worst year and least cited in 20 years. After graduation, obama got a job with a law firm as an affirmative action hire. What were the cases that he litigated? Did he litigate any major cases? Or, was he put in an office to be trotted out for show? Writ large on obama's resume is that he was a professor of Constitutional Law. In reality he was NEVER a professor of Constitutional law. He was an adjunct or visiting professor.

Not so hot. On Volokh.com, somebody calling himself LawStatMan goes all Bill James on the citation record:

Obama’s vol. 104 is the least-cited volume of the Harvard Law Review in the last 20 years

I've run electronic searches to determine the number of times Obama’s volume 104, and every other volume of the Harvard Law Review published during the last 20 years, has been cited in all law reviews during each subsequent year for which full data is available (starting in the year after the last issue of each volume appeared, and running through 2006, the last year for which full citation data is currently available).

a more rigorous blue-penciler."

There doesn't seem to be any record of Obama publishing anything in his own journal. The commenter who say he's a former editor of HLR claimed on Volokh:

"The law students on the Review all have the right to publish at least one piece (typically they publish at least their third-year papers, which they have to write anyway), and many publish at least two pieces. It would seem surprising if Obama published nothing at all in the very Review over which, he has so often boasted, he presided as President."

Okay, assuming all this is true, what are we to make it?

1. Obama was, objectively speaking, a lousy president of the Harvard Law Review.


How Good Was Obama At Running The Harvard Law Review? | VDARE.com

Not only was he a lousy president, but he never bothered to publish anything of his own! Stupidity or just LAZY.

Obama's laughable legal "career".

"He was doing the work that any first-year or second-year associate would do," Miner said. "In litigation, he was doing basic research and writing memos. . . . In the first couple years he would play a very minor role. He wouldn't know [much], so he would take the lead from whoever was supervising his work."
Is Obama A Lawyer | Obama's law days effective but brief - Los Angeles Times

Excuse me, he worked for this firm for four years and didn't progress beyond first or second year associate work?

He had ONE major case, how much help he had on that case is like everything else, unknown.

The primary beneficiary of obama's employment with this firm is Tony Rezko and we know what happened there. Which begs the question. How many criminals and terrorists as friends does Herman Cain have?
 

Forum List

Back
Top