Because as a figurhead, the President has the reponsibility to lead congress.....very much like Clinton did...in my opinion.
It was only out of deference and respect that they impeached him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because as a figurhead, the President has the reponsibility to lead congress.....very much like Clinton did...in my opinion.
No question the GOP is running it's B Team. A bunch of not ready for prime time candidates who are looking for their 15 minutes of fame
In other years, Romney would be a third or fourth choice candidate. This year, he is the only one who is remotely electable.....and that is if the economy completely tanks
Obama could certainly be beaten in 2012.......but not by this band of misfits
The GOP is facing some serious lack of viability with this bunch of losers. The only reason anyone will vote for any of them is out of sheer hatred of Obama. That doesn't say a whole lot for their credentials to be president--or even much about how voters actually feel about them. I wonder if the GOP will remain intact after they lose the election. Oh well, that's why God made football and beer.
There should be a dedicated search function for useless threads.
Congratulations.
The most naive and childish post of 2011.
Really? How so?
Has the Tea Party been voting for Democrats behind our backs?
you are way out of your league with me...so dont even try.
If you understood the ideology of a conservative, the ideology of the tea party, the ideology of the GOP as a collective..and the ideology of the democratic party as a collective...you would not have brought up such a naive childish topic for it is irrelevant.
I am a conservative....I will almost always vote GOP...but I am not a republican....but the GOP offers candidates that are more in line with my ideology.....but I am by no means a republican.
I believe that is way too deep for you to understand.
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
I'm interested in your description of Obama...
Granted.. I expect silence on this matter...
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
I'm interested in your description of Obama...
Granted.. I expect silence on this matter...
Why, is Obama a GOP candidate?
And CG lightning bolts coming out of the fingertips...I'm interested in your description of Obama...
Granted.. I expect silence on this matter...
Why, is Obama a GOP candidate?
cluck.. cluck..cluck
... I figured it would be far too much of a challenge for You....
(I'll help you out.. think styrofoam Greek columns and floating above us all..)
NYCarbineer...you have read enough of my posts to understand where I come from.
I see the president as a figure head. For anyone to blame Bush or Obama for anything that goes on is a waste of time....
Congress is our law making body.
You still say Bush's war...I say congress' war.
You still say "the Bush Tax Cuts.
I say congress' tax cuts.
You still say Obama's stimulus...
I say congress' stimulus.
That being said....congress has scuked since Bush took over in 2000.
Congress was doing well with Clinton (second 4 years)...and during Reagans tenure.
Since then?
Failure.
So if the office of the President holds no more than figurehead status, why did you try to make 'leadership' an issue?
Because as a figurhead, the President has the reponsibility to lead congress.....very much like Clinton did...in my opinion.
Question...how has congress been performing in yoiur eyes?
Now...dont give me that old..."for Obamas first two years they did great"...
It is not difficult to be productive when you have a majority oin both houses.
But a split congress? How is it going right now? How is Obama doing keeping them in check?
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
I'm interested in your description of Obama...
Granted.. I expect silence on this matter...
you are way out of your league with me...so dont even try.
If you understood the ideology of a conservative, the ideology of the tea party, the ideology of the GOP as a collective..and the ideology of the democratic party as a collective...you would not have brought up such a naive childish topic for it is irrelevant.
I am a conservative....I will almost always vote GOP...but I am not a republican....but the GOP offers candidates that are more in line with my ideology.....but I am by no means a republican.
I believe that is way too deep for you to understand.
I don't care what you call yourself. In this two-party system, you're voting Republican..... unless you want to throw your vote away and vote Independent.
So in other words I was correct......this is way too deep for you.
You prefer to look at it at face value.
Thats fine....
But as I said earlier...you are way out of your league when debating me then.
Not that I am the all knowing...I am far from it and many on here will tell you how good debaters have had me see the err of my thinkiong on many an occasion..
But your "face value" style will do nothing of any value.
The Tea Party is just the same old right wing of the GOP, with a different name. Some of us have been telling them that for a couple years,
ironically, it's usually the Tea Partiers themselves who throw a fit over being described in that (accurate) manner.
Interestingly, the ones who have been telling them that...such as you...completely disagree with their sentiments..
Yet, for some reason, you believe you know more about them than they do.
Do you not see the irony in it?
Do you not see how immature it makes you appear?
Give it a rest. We get it. You disagree with them so they are a bunch of no nothing sheep.
Does the Tea Party ever vote, in meaningful numbers, for anyone other than the Republican in any given race?
Does the Tea Party ever, in meaningul numbers, get behind a third party candidate?
Does the Tea Party hold any positions (in a consensus) that disagree with the positions held by the right wing of the Republican Party (in a consensus)? Name those positions.
How many socially liberal Tea Partiers can you name? Especially any of any sort of prominence in the movement?
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
There should be a dedicated search function for useless threads.
This is an OPINION board. The OP expresses the OPINION of the author. In my opinion, he is spot on.
This is far from a "useless" thread. The OP raises issues about each of the mentioned candidates that had better be met by each one of them if they expect to get the nomination, let alone beat Obama in 2012.
Ever hear the expression, "perception is reality"? Whether you like it or not, the perceptions of each of the candidates expressed in the OP are, once again in my opinion, perceptions that are shared by a large number of voters.
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
I'm interested in your description of Obama...
Granted.. I expect silence on this matter...
As I've stated several times before on this board, I was not an Obama fan, nor did I vote for him in 2008 - even though I knew he was better than McCain/Palin. I was pissed because the DNC cheated Hillary out of her rightful nomination. Now, I consider Obama far superior to the current crop of GOP candidates; therefore, I will be voting for Obama in 2012.
Overall, I believe Obama has been a good president - in spite of all the GOP hate and obstruction to hold Americans hostage and make Obama a one-term president. History will not be kind to the GOP during the Obama Administration.
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
Is this a Private Lynch Mob? You leave reason ad common sense at the door, right?
I'm interested in your description of Obama...
Granted.. I expect silence on this matter...
As I've stated several times before on this board, I was not an Obama fan, nor did I vote for him in 2008 - even though I knew he was better than McCain/Palin. I was pissed because the DNC cheated Hillary out of her rightful nomination. Now, I consider Obama far superior to the current crop of GOP candidates; therefore, I will be voting for Obama in 2012.
Overall, I believe Obama has been a good president - in spite of all the GOP hate and obstruction to hold Americans hostage and make Obama a one-term president. History will not be kind to the GOP during the Obama Administration.
I did not vote for him in the primaries but I sure did vote for him in the election even though I was pissed too. Unfortunately with our two-party system, it's difficult to vote for the other party as a referendum against your own party. All that does is shoot yourself in the foot.
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
I'm interested in your description of Obama...
Granted.. I expect silence on this matter...
As I've stated several times before on this board, I was not an Obama fan, nor did I vote for him in 2008 - even though I knew he was better than McCain/Palin. I was pissed because the DNC cheated Hillary out of her rightful nomination. Now, I consider Obama far superior to the current crop of GOP candidates; therefore, I will be voting for Obama in 2012.
Overall, I believe Obama has been a good president - in spite of all the GOP hate and obstruction to hold Americans hostage and make Obama a one-term president. History will not be kind to the GOP during the Obama Administration.
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
Is this a Private Lynch Mob? You leave reason ad common sense at the door, right?
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
Is this a Private Lynch Mob? You leave reason ad common sense at the door, right?
Where am I wrong...?
Reminds me of a fast talking Texan, that can be good or bad. Did well in the debate last night. It was the most relaxed I've seen him. I'm wary of major players that shift Parties, though Texas Democrats are a different breed than the norm.Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
He has allot of good reason, but goes overboard. I don't like him on National Defense. The World is Predatory. Walk softly and carry a big stick. Like Obama, he blames us too much, not seeing True Nature and True Threat.Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.