Have you been 'Trumped'?

[Hossfly]

I haven't been Trumped but the liberal pukes have been Bidened. And Rep. Mace has iron-clad proof.

The latest:

‘North Of $50 Million’: GOP Rep Mace Says Biden Payouts Even Higher Than Reported

Republican Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina said the money paid to the Biden family was much higher than reported, based on suspicious activity reports.

dailycaller.com

 

[marvin martian]

If he can prove his false statements as fact, there is no crime.

LOL

When are they arresting KJP?

 

[MarathonMike]

I see Rumpshill is still shoveling the Democrat Regime bullshit.

 

[jotathought]

Dont get me wrong, I cant stand trump. He loved abusing hsi power, eroding our rights, he lied, he is immature and appeased people for votes. Like when he gave all that money to black communities. But he isnt half a trashy as biden. Its not even close.
Wonder how many grandkids trump acts like doesnt exist?

You talk how you love people supporting and defending an individual .. I love it when people make baseless comments without any substance..

So tell us .. what rights did you have that were eroded?

 

[BackAgain]

Not only that, but did the STATE Attorney General give the DA the authority to pursue STATE charges?

Local prosecutors charge crimes based on state laws. I don’t think they need the state AG permission. That said, I still find her indictment charges to be spurious, at best.

Charging Giuliani with RICO is like challenging Tom Brady to a passing contest.

She is a fame-blinded liberal activist.

 

[Rumpole]

There is nothing against the law in making false statements.

But, how about these false statements:

Read the indictment.

the false statements were part of a vast conspiracy, with some 49 participans, 30 who are unindicted co conspirators and 19 who are on the indictment, a scheme whose objective was to overthrow the election.

False statements are not protected by the first amendment when they are aligned with a criminal conspiracy.

Biden's misstatements of fact are neither lies, nor crimes. Getting facts wrong is not a 'lie' per se.

But, declaring that the only way Democrats can win is if they rig the election, and declare that lie months before the first ballot is cast, IS a lie, and a lie of the worst kind, because it is done via the largest megaphone on earth, but that isn't the bad part, the bad part is that it poisons democracy in the minds of some 75 million followers, a plight which makes Putin smile.

Read the indictment,.

this idea that Biden equals Trump is not a rational statement.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23909556/trump-and-allies-georgia-indictment.pdf

 

[Rumpole]

So, what Gore did in 2000 and what Hillary did in 2016.

Got it.

You've been Trumped.

Got it.

See #26

 

[Rumpole]

I see Rumpshill is still shoveling the Democrat Regime bullshit.

Incompetent rebuttal. No argument offered.

 

[Rumpole]

You got your indictments. What more do you want? Ain't it time to consider the real freaking world instead of the former president?

how about voting for someone other than Trump?

That too rational of a concept for you?

I don't know if you noticed the real world yourself, lately, but last time I checked Trump is a candidate for president and by that fact, still fair game.

 

[Rumpole]

He's gonna prove that on Monday. He has an "irrefutable report".

Yeah, I saw that tweet, hilarious.

 

[Rumpole]

No, i have not been Trumped, because my brain works perfectly and there was zero chance such a charlatan and semi-literate con artist would, or could, fool me about anything. He is a demigod to his base because they are not politically astute and are easy to dupe.

Not this kid.

Uh, slight correction, 'demagogue' not 'demigod'.

 

[Hossfly]

The OP is a prime example of how liberal pukes can take the findings of a congressional committee and their investigators and denounce it as false. The liberal pukes here know everything and much more than committees and investigators. Why, they have the proof because that is what Jake Tripper and Rachel Mancow have revealed and that, by God is the Holy Word. I don't know why the liberal pukes here don't share their knowledge and advice with the Democrats in Congress.

 

[Independent thinker]

Read the indictment.

the false statements were part of a vast conspiracy, with some 49 participans, 30 who are unindicted co conspirators and 19 who are on the indictment, a scheme whose objective was to overthrow the election.

False statements are not protected by the first amendment when they are aligned with a criminal conspiracy.

Biden's misstatements of fact are neither lies, nor crimes. Getting facts wrong is not a 'lie' per se.

But, declaring that the only way Democrats can win is if they rig the election, and declare that lie months before the first ballot is cast, IS a lie, and a lie of the worst kind, because it is done via the largest megaphone on earth, but that isn't the bad part, the bad part is that it poisons democracy in the minds of some 75 million followers, a plight which makes Putin smile.

Read the indictment,.

this idea that Biden equals Trump is not a rational statement.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23909556/trump-and-allies-georgia-indictment.pdf

I don't have to read the indictment to know it is yet more abuse of power to get Trump. Kangaroo investigations lead to kangaroo indictments and kangaroo courts. We have turned into Russia just as Putin arrested Navalny on Trumped up charges where he was tried in kangaroo courts who found him guilty.

 

[odanny]

Uh, slight correction, 'demagogue' not 'demigod'.

No, that's not what I meant.

 

[YoursTruly]

Okay, Trump fans, if you read the GA indictment, it chronicles all of the false statements regarding election fraud, just about every claim of election fraud is listed in that indictment. The lies are 'acts in furtherance of a conspiracy to overthrow Biden's legitimate election'.

Now, the first amendment doesn't protect speech done in the furtherance of a criminal conspiracy, so, it seems to me, the only defense for Trump, et al, will be to prove that all of the false statements in the indictment alleged to be false, his defense will be to prove that they are actually true.

If he can prove his false statements as fact, there is no crime. All of this will come out in trial, and we shall find out if he was lying. I know that he was lying, because no proof of any kind has been produced. I've seen it all. Irregularities, isolated instances, sure, they exist in all elections, but a vast conspiracy to steal the election? No way. It's not even logistically possible, if you would take the time to scrutinize exactly what you are alleging.

See. what I think you Trump fans don't realize is that Trump, what he did was, first he planted the idea into the minds of his base by declaring, months before the first ballot was cast 'the only way Democrats can win is if they rig the election', and when the election came, given that all elections have irregularities, he exploited those irregularities, the kind of which occur in every election, the kind of which are not made a big stink about in past elections, but, alas, Trump could 'trump them up' so to speak, make them seem like the 'fraud' he was talking about when he first told the big lie.

And then the scheme (the conspiracy listed in the GA indictment) unfolded to bolster the lie.

Don't you see what Trump has done? You've been a victim of his treachery, all along, and you don't even know it.

Everything about Trump, his defrauding thousands out of millions for a fake university, his fake charity he was fined $2 million for 'illegal activities', I mean, his paying hush money to a porn star, I could go on and on about his crimes, frauds, all the folks in his entourage indicted, convicted, the man is rife with criminality, it oozes from every pore of his being, he poisons everyone he comes into contact with, and they wind up being indicted, convicted and now 6 more of his lawyer's are being indicted, all of the folks who tried to help in in GA, are being indicted, and trying to steal an election, while accusing dems of doing it, is consistent with who Trump is.

And who is Trump?

It's really simple.

He's the biggest criminal, con man America has ever experienced, and you've been Trumped.

Vote for someone else, Chris Christy, or someone like that, you know, someone who IS NOT A CRIMINAL. I mean, after the crimes of NIxon, Agnew, Reagan, you'd think you guys would have learned your lesson by now, but, I guess not . Oh, I know you think his popularity is rising, yes, with his hard core base. But, when the trials begin, your boy is going to be sitting in court, day after day, revelations, details of his crimes will come to light, the scheme will be front and center, that Biden actually won and that Trump is, indeed, who the prosecution claims him to be, the biggest con man criminal this country has ever seen in the White House and we shall see if his numbers hold during the general elections.

What this boils down to is micromanaging the criminalizing "thought." So what if Trump thought the election was stolen. So what if he set his supporters up to believe it. So what if Trump wanted someone in charge to find enough votes to put him over the top.

I can't stand Trump. But what I can't stand even worse this micromanaging thinking, and then the state finding a way to prosecute it.

FFS, if anyone supports this crap, it's going to be used against your favorite candidate soon enough. Imagine, getting prosecuted for believing something wrong happened and trying to get to the proof you need. Regardless of what the proof is.

 

[lennypartiv]

Whataboutism.
False equivalency.
Neither Clinton nor Gore went to the illegal lengths Trump did attempting to STEAL an election.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

There is nothing against the law in making false statements.

But, how about these false statements:

It is pretty clear that various parts of government engaged in some seriously shady acts regarding the 2020 election.

Nearly all the recent charge brought against Trump seem to be for making “false statements” truthfully calling out these various shady acts.

We have the outrageous hubris of these acts having been carried out in the open, in many cases not even trying to hide what they were doing; and now they are trying to criminally prosecute Trump for calling them out on it.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Examples?

He tried to enact an executive order robbing taxpayers in order to pay off the debts of deadbeats who can't be bothered to pay their studen loans.

Oh, wait, that was Biden, wasn't it?



Well, he tried to force certain workers to take dangerous experimental drugs, as a condition of keeping their jobs.

Oh, that was Biden too.



He's aided and abetted foreign criminals participating in a hostile invasion of our country. Nope, that was also Biden.


OK, I give up. What actual acts of corruption, and abuses of power, did Trump commit?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

the false statements were part of a vast conspiracy…

Would that be the same “vast right-wing conspiracy” that Hitlery Clinton claimed, back in the 1990s, was out to get her and her corrupt piece-of-shit husband?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

See #26

See 125.