H. R. 1205 Is Looking Good

build a huge fence, take all Palestinians out of Israel , and take all jews living in other countries, including the US and put them inside the fence,
To Penelope: The rest of the world can also isolate Muslims in their own countries. I prefer that because they are doing the killing. That might be the only solution when the world has had enough of the New World Order crowd’s agenda:

The fact is that militarily occupying a defeated country is not the only choice. The lesson learned in the Algerian War (1954 - 1962), and the more recent war in Iraq, taught that future wars must be fought without occupation as the end game when it is certain the enemy will fallback on terrorism to drive out the occupiers.​

6 Destroy everything with all of the technology available short of nuclear weapons. Destroy every commercial building. Destroy every structure higher than 25 feet. Destroy every dam, every bridge, every tunnel, every power plant, every airport, every railroad. When that is done do not sign a peace treaty with people who advocated war in the first place. Never signing a peace treaty means that every time a defeated enemy rebuilds something knock it down again until they curse the reason they started their war.​

In short: Do not occupy. Do not let them emigrate. Isolate them in their own country.

Muslims Made Occupation Obsolete

Incidentally, since you do not want to live with Jews ask yourself this: Assuming Muslims do not kill every Jew should they conquer Israel where will all of those defeated Israeli Jews go?
 
Mike Huckabee better be careful before he ends up leading a movement to pass H. R. 1205. In this appearance on FOX he defines the map I posted:



Huckabee: Take money from U.N. for U.S. soldiers

Incidentally, all of the wall-to-wall coverage about Russians influencing our recent election, expelling a few Russians, etc., is designed to sweep the United Nations resolution under the rug.

Putin’s election hacking bullshit also makes it look like he was helping Donald Trump defeat Clinton/Obama. The whole thing stinks to high heaven. Democrats are allowed to steal elections, but woe betide to foreigners who interfere in the sacred vote.

Presumably, the tens of millions of dollars the lying sack of shit got in ILLEGAL campaign contributions in 2008 from foreigners did not influence the election, but Putin gave Trump the election without contributing a penny to Trump’s campaign.

The truth is that Democrats are in a major meltdown because Hillary failed to steal enough votes to win.

Yes the money can be used to buy the soldiers coffins when the world's powers start going to war against each other again.
 
Finally, as far as I know, it was Turkish Muslims in the Ottoman Empire who invented genocide before World War One

Hahahaha..The Ottoman Turks did not invent genocide....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA!
 
Last edited:
Mike Huckabee better be careful before he ends up leading a movement to pass H. R. 1205. In this appearance on FOX he defines the map I posted:



Huckabee: Take money from U.N. for U.S. soldiers

Incidentally, all of the wall-to-wall coverage about Russians influencing our recent election, expelling a few Russians, etc., is designed to sweep the United Nations resolution under the rug.

Putin’s election hacking bullshit also makes it look like he was helping Donald Trump defeat Clinton/Obama. The whole thing stinks to high heaven. Democrats are allowed to steal elections, but woe betide to foreigners who interfere in the sacred vote.

Presumably, the tens of millions of dollars the lying sack of shit got in ILLEGAL campaign contributions in 2008 from foreigners did not influence the election, but Putin gave Trump the election without contributing a penny to Trump’s campaign.

The truth is that Democrats are in a major meltdown because Hillary failed to steal enough votes to win.


Not bullshit. I can only imagine if Putin had wanted Hillary to win , you'd be singing a different tune. Then again Hillary never said she'd move the embassy to Jerusalem like Cruz and Trump did, both of which are Zionist.

By the way, even with Putin espionage into the election, and his hatred for Hillary, she still won by over 3 million votes, and Trump only won the EC because people like the circus.
 
she still won by over 3 million votes, and Trump only won the EC because people like the circus.
To Penelope: Give it a rest:

Clinton got 7,362,490 votes in California. There is no way of identifying her illegal votes in that total, nor is anybody trying to find out. The same is true in every state with a large immigrant population.

Hell, Los Angeles, California alone is good for a million illegal alien votes.​

XXXXX

I was wrong. Somebody is trying:​

“We are still collecting data and will be for several months, but our intent is to publish a comprehensive study on the significant impact of illegal voting in all of its many forms and begin a national discussion on how voters, states and the Trump administration can address this growing problem,” she said.

“We put out a statement shortly after the president-elect’s comments came out, and we said that we support the belief that there could, in fact, have been millions of illegally cast votes, and we are doing tremendous amounts of research to try to get to some of those answers.”​

Trump may be right about winning popular legal vote
Posted By Bob Unruh On 11/29/2016 @ 8:18 pm

Trump may be right about winning popular legal vote

Frigging In The Rigging
 
I have high hopes that the time is at hand for the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. It has been around since 1997 and it never got out of committee. Previously it was called H.R. 1146, and H.R. 75, and H.R. 1205. This time it is H. R. 193:

Text: H.R.193 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

115th CONGRESS
1st Session

To end membership of the United States in the United Nations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 3, 2017

Mr. Rogers of Alabama (for himself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Smith of Missouri, and Mr. Massie) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

Text - H.R.193 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017

Whatever number it goes by getting it out of committee and to a floor vote never looked better than it looks today.

Alabama Congressman Sponsors Bill to Remove US from the United Nations
Justin Holcomb
Posted: Jan 23, 2017 12:30 PM

Alabama Congressman Sponsors Bill to Remove US from the United Nations

If H.R. 193 passes in the House it still has to face that nest of traitors in the U.S. Senate. That is when all good men and women come to the aid of their country —— or come to the aid of the United Nations.
 
Finally, as far as I know, it was Turkish Muslims in the Ottoman Empire who invented genocide before World War One

Hahahaha..The Ottoman Turks did not invent genocide....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA!

The term “genocide” was coined bearing the Armenian experience in mind - 100 Years, 100 Facts about Armenia to commemorate the centennial of the Armenian Genocide


Fact No. 62.
The term “genocide” was coined bearing the Armenian experience in mind.
Wholesales massacres are not a new invention. Records of mass killing, whether of bloodthirsty, pillaging hordes, or organised armies of conquerors or colonists, have added shades of red to the pages of history books and chronicles since very ancient times. The concept of genocide, however – to be more specific, its use as a legal term in international law – is a 20th century phenomenon, and it stems from the Armenian experience of the First World War, in the dying days of the Ottoman Empire.

The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was passed unanimously by the UN General Assembly in 1948. The individual behind that document, its development, its meaning, and its adoption, was one Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew born in 1900 in what is Belarus today. Lemkin closely followed the widely-reported massacres and deportations of Armenians in his youth, and invoked that experience later with the Jewish Holocaust, during which his own family perished.

As the Nazis invaded Poland, Lemkin found safe haven in the United States, where he gained a reputation as a legal scholar following his work at Duke University, in the US government, and at Yale – positions that allowed him to pursue efforts against targeted killings at the Nuremberg trials of German officers, and also at the UN. He came up with “genocide” as an original term in order to highlight the phenomenon and give it enough depth to stand on its own as a legal category. Lemkin mentions in a TV interview of the time how the word, which combines Greek and Latin roots, was informed by the Armenian experience.
 
In the past 17 years I cannot count the number of times I pointed out that United Nations is as organization claiming to be a government. Now I learn that a global cesspool is a REGISTERED CORPORATION:

At ZeroHedge, the report continued, “Perhaps the biggest revelations to come from such news would be the eventual exposure of the level of theft, deception and criminal activity done by the registered corporation known as The United Nations (yes it is a registered corporation).”​

Congressional plan would take U.S. out of U.N.
Posted By Bob Unruh On 01/24/2017 @ 2:55 pm

Congressional plan would take U.S. out of U.N.

That is one helluva corporation. The corporation and its employees enjoy diplomatic immunity. The corporation has ships not registered in any country. The corporation has a judicial system but it cannot be sued. The corporation has a military with unlimited authority. The corporation has its own postage stamps. The corporation takes in billions every year but PAYS NO TAXES. The corporation cannot be audited. The corporation’s employees have the best pension and medical plan in the world. And just to add insult to injury to drivers everywhere the corporation’s automobiles pay no parking tickets.

Since Democrats despise corporations so much I will help them out by calling the United Nations a corporation claiming to be a government.
 
Trump and May blowing smoke sounded good today:



Theresa May did not sound so good yesterday. In fact she was downright scary:

Mrs. May began her speech at the Republican Retreat in Philadelphia with a brief history of Anglo-American relations, invoking the spirit of the Founding Fathers of the U.S. as well as expressing gratitude towards America’s involvement in the World Wars of the 20th century.

But her speech was also littered with politically correct terms, as well as left and centre-left talking points regarding international institutions, Islam, and radical Islamic terrorism, the latter of which she called “Islamist extremism”.

The British premier compared “open, liberal and democratic” societies in the West versus “closed, coercive” ones. She hailed the United Nations, praised the World Bank, and called NATO “the cornerstone” of Western defence.

And Mrs. May also spoke of the necessity for multilateralism in stark contrast with the line pushed by the White House — which prefers bilateralism — over recent days. She cited the need to tackle “climate change” as one of the reasons to back globalist institutions.

Britain’s Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalism Good, Climate Change a Priority
by Raheem Kassam26 Jan 2017

Britain's Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalist Orgs Good, Climate Change Priority

I will give President Trump a pass and assume he is too smart to fall in with May’s obvious admiration for the United Nations. The question is: How much support will May and the Socialist UK provide when H.R. 193 passes?
Text - H.R.193 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017
 
Idiom: You can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.

1_312017_b1maylgdefunding8201_s878x1073.jpg
http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/med....jpg?1039b1e57757237d0f23a6570622c9aeee5dda34

The Guardian, a British newspaper, jumped into the controversy, reporting that “U.S. allies have reacted with a mix of alarm and skepticism.” An unnamed “senior European diplomat” said: “It would potentially be brutal.” I hope you’re not so cynical as to think that unnamed senior European diplomats throw such terms around lightly.​

Putting a price tag on the United Nations
American taxpayers may be paying out a lot more than it’s worth
By Clifford D. May - - Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Putting a price tag on the United Nations

I have one complaint with Clifford May’s informative article. You cannot make a diamond out of a sow’s turd:

th
https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.pTy0ZGzjrXD_8ThWsF5fmgEsEs&pid=Api&w=180&h=181
 

Forum List

Back
Top