Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
constitution fanatics are pretty silly.
Constitution starts with a capital. So, you're working on troll status or you just showed up as one to begin with?
That would be overreaction to not capitalizing Constitution. Do you want to discuss the topic or correct my spelling?
I think he's just incredibly naïve. Not surprising that he admires a pretentious asshole like WC.That's silly.
constitution fanatics are pretty silly.
Constitution starts with a capital. So, you're working on troll status or you just showed up as one to begin with?
So don't own a firearm. Problem solved!A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.
One study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in
the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf
If having a view opposite to yours and putting a link to a story in that supports my position is "trolling", then I'm a "troll".
It appears the only "liberty" you're interested in "saving" is your own, pussy cat.
So don't own a firearm. Problem solved!A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.
One study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in
the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf
If having a view opposite to yours and putting a link to a story in that supports my position is "trolling", then I'm a "troll".
It appears the only "liberty" you're interested in "saving" is your own, pussy cat.
Where did I say any of that? Give me a post number.So don't own a firearm. Problem solved!A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.
One study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in
the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf
If having a view opposite to yours and putting a link to a story in that supports my position is "trolling", then I'm a "troll".
It appears the only "liberty" you're interested in "saving" is your own, pussy cat.
It's not a problem for me to express my position. It appears more a problem to you. You want to shut 53% of Americans up.
I'm not planning on sealing my lips because you don't like what I have to say.
You complain about President Obama somehow trumping on your gun rights when truth is that gun sales have boomed in this President's term so far.
Where did I say any of that? Give me a post number.So don't own a firearm. Problem solved!
It's not a problem for me to express my position. It appears more a problem to you. You want to shut 53% of Americans up.
I'm not planning on sealing my lips because you don't like what I have to say.
You complain about President Obama somehow trumping on your gun rights when truth is that gun sales have boomed in this President's term so far.
Whatever collective that is, I'm not part of it.Where did I say any of that? Give me a post number.It's not a problem for me to express my position. It appears more a problem to you. You want to shut 53% of Americans up.
I'm not planning on sealing my lips because you don't like what I have to say.
You complain about President Obama somehow trumping on your gun rights when truth is that gun sales have boomed in this President's term so far.
The "you" in my statement is a collective you, not personal to YOU.
Hey westie. I see it differently.
Can you live with that?
Of course. I do every single day. I could care less what you wish to do with your life. I draw the line at when you attempt to dictate to me what I should do with mine.
Verstehen sie?
What makes you think I'm dictating what you should do with your life?
Hey chump, I'd match my sling shot to your gun anytime.
I admire your hutzpah but question your sanity
It's a joke, bud.
That does not mean I adopt by proxy all statements you have attributed to that group.Whatever collective that is, I'm not part of it.The "you" in my statement is a collective you, not personal to YOU.
Sure you are. You're a big proponent of gun culture.
constitution fanatics are pretty silly.
Constitution starts with a capital. So, you're working on troll status or you just showed up as one to begin with?
That would be overreaction to not capitalizing Constitution. Do you want to discuss the topic or correct my spelling?
Some here are a part of gun culture and some are not. Are you suggesting that those of us who don't own guns have no right to comment on gun culture? 47% of Americans own guns, which means 53% of us don't.
Here's a Time photo essay:
Gun Culture U.S.A. - Photo Essays - TIME
A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.
One study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in
the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf
If having a view opposite to yours and putting a link to a story in that supports my position is "trolling", then I'm a "troll".
It appears the only "liberty" you're interested in "saving" is your own, pussy cat.
A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.
One study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in
the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf
If having a view opposite to yours and putting a link to a story in that supports my position is "trolling", then I'm a "troll".
It appears the only "liberty" you're interested in "saving" is your own, pussy cat.
A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.
One study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in
the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf
If having a view opposite to yours and putting a link to a story in that supports my position is "trolling", then I'm a "troll".
It appears the only "liberty" you're interested in "saving" is your own, pussy cat.
Good news! Those people lived at least for a while. They bought a gun because of a threat. Some of it domestic violence. You got a better idea of how a woman is suppose to defend herself? You'd have a point IF I owned a gun. I'm defending the Constitutional rights of others at this point. Also, reserving the right to own one myself if circumstances dictate.
As to your troll status, you showed up after a long absence claiming to not discuss politics. In short order you run to a gun control thread. Seems unlikely you have been truthful with us.
A 1997 American Journal of Public Health study showed that family members that had a history of buying a handgun from a licensed dealer were twice as likely to die in a suicide or homicide as were persons similarly situated who had no such family history of gun purchase. This increased risk persisted for more than five years after the handgun was purchased.
One study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that having a gun in
the home made it nearly three times more likely that someone in the family will be killed. This risk is particularly high for women, who are more likely to be killed by a spouse, intimate acquaintance, or close relative. An Archives of Internal Medicine study found that, with one or more guns in the home, the risk of suicide among women increased nearly five times and the risk of homicide increased more than three times.
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/self_defense.pdf
If having a view opposite to yours and putting a link to a story in that supports my position is "trolling", then I'm a "troll".
It appears the only "liberty" you're interested in "saving" is your own, pussy cat.
Good news! Those people lived at least for a while. They bought a gun because of a threat. Some of it domestic violence. You got a better idea of how a woman is suppose to defend herself? You'd have a point IF I owned a gun. I'm defending the Constitutional rights of others at this point. Also, reserving the right to own one myself if circumstances dictate.
As to your troll status, you showed up after a long absence claiming to not discuss politics. In short order you run to a gun control thread. Seems unlikely you have been truthful with us.
Hey, I'm not into arguing. I like to express my position and that's about it.
My position has nothing to do with "trouncing" on the Constitutional right to bear arms.
I'm commenting on the obvious. We live in a gun culture.
A woman is much more likely to die in a DV home where guns are available.
Good news! Those people lived at least for a while. They bought a gun because of a threat. Some of it domestic violence. You got a better idea of how a woman is suppose to defend herself? You'd have a point IF I owned a gun. I'm defending the Constitutional rights of others at this point. Also, reserving the right to own one myself if circumstances dictate.
As to your troll status, you showed up after a long absence claiming to not discuss politics. In short order you run to a gun control thread. Seems unlikely you have been truthful with us.
Hey, I'm not into arguing. I like to express my position and that's about it.
My position has nothing to do with "trouncing" on the Constitutional right to bear arms.
I'm commenting on the obvious. We live in a gun culture.
A woman is much more likely to die in a DV home where guns are available.
See Dr. Edgar Suters response above. Your figures are wrong and demonstrably so. The study that it is based on was horribly biased and lacked any semblance of proper survey conduct.
But hey, if you wish to base your belief system on a lie, by all means do so.
I won't.
