2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,977
- 52,255
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #41
The regular point that 2aguy makes is that gun laws don't prevent gun crimes 100% so should be scrapped."even when they had access to guns", like they don't have access to guns.
We've done this before so many fucking times. THEY HAVE GUNS.
What's DIFFERENT is that access is LIMITED and RESTRICTED whereas in the US it isn't.
The issue here is that there are more guns than before, the Yardies brought in guns for the first real time. Gun murders WENT UP.
Homicide - Office for National Statistics
You can look on this interactive map and see. April 2002 to March 2003 was the highest murder rate. It got up to 1.7 murders per 100,000 people. Massively lower than the US's rate. This is for England and Wales rather than the UK.
By April 2014-March 2015 this has dropped to 0.9, nearly half.
That's with guns being in the country. So why did the murder rate go down?
Better policing, the left wing Labour Party increased spending on the police force.
You know what's changed since then? The right wing Tory Party reducing spending on policing.
The murder rate is going up. But by 2017 it was 10.7.
Homicide in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics
So, the murder rate fluctuates, and it often fluctuates based on police spending and the like. But the UK is more likely to deal with the problems from every aspect, social, economic etc, whereas in the US politicians ignore all the problems, and people like you do too.
The answer just writes itself.
Why have drug laws, abortion laws, immigration laws...?
The point that 2Aguy makes is that he's an absolute fraud and "fake news" reporter.
No, gun laws don't stop things 100%, who said they do?
The UK's murder rate is 4 time or more lower than the US's. A rise in crime is inevitable as is a drop in crime at other times. That's what happens in life.
The fraud is trying to claim that a rise is worse than a drop in crime and murders, REGARDLESS of what the rate is in the first place. This is just ridiculous.
And again, you go to a statistic that is not relevant to the gun control laws in Britain working, since gun crime is going up..which means there are more guns in the hands of criminals in Britain...... that means that if they wanted to murder people with those guns, they could.
You keep being told over and over again that Britain did not have a high gun murder rate for it's entire history.....that means before they banned guns. Then, they banned guns and there was a spike in gun murder, and now it has gone down...what didn't go down? Gun crime...that is up...not down. You need to distract attention away from that fact.
You're telling me about stuff that's not relevant? Wow, the king of posting totally irrelevant crap.
No, more gun crime does not equate to more guns in the hands of criminals. That's a ridiculous assertion.
Yes, if they wanted to murder people, they could. I mean if you had a knife or poison or a car or hands you could also murder people.
Unfortunately for you and your lunacy, there are no international statistics on the numbers of people who WANT TO MURDER PEOPLE BUT DON'T.
But thank you for that irrelevant crap anyway.
So, you're trying to make the argument that gun violence was low before gun control laws were enacted therefore.... therefore... who the fuck knows that comes after therefore. The UK had low numbers of guns before gun control. In 1997 gun control was enacted to stop random mass gun murders, of which there haven't been many while the US has one every month right now.
So the gun control law works. However you have decided that somehow you either have gun control and it works 100% or you don't have it. You can't have an in between because... because... who the fuck knows what comes after because.
As for your claim, backed up by not one single statistic, that gun crime didn't go down. Bullshit.
See here, 2002 gun murders went up, as did murder in general, and then it wen down again. Dropping by more than 50%.
And here's firearms offenses which reached a high in 2006 and then went down too.
Right, so you've just made up "facts" again, for the umpteenth time. Why do you pull this shit exactly?
So the gun control law works. However you have decided that somehow you either have gun control and it works 100% or you don't have it. You can't have an in between because... because... who the fuck knows what comes after because.
This is pretty much the cornerstone of his bullshit. Refuting claims that have never been made. A rational person reading it would conclude that we need less guns in the UK not more.
With low gun ownership we have a murder rate that is a fraction of the US with its gun culture. It is impossible to make a coherent argument against that.
Gun ownership doesn't drive the murder rate...criminals deciding to murder their victims drives the murder rate and as we keep showing you, criminals in Britain have guns......lots of guns....they don't use them to murder their victims as often as American criminals do. You can't make a coherent argument because you can't explain how you have more gun crime in Britain after you banned and confiscated guns...while in America we have less gun crime as more Americans own and actually carry guns. You go to the British gun murder rate in a desperate attempt to hide your inability to explain more gun crime, but as we show you that Britain had a low gun murder rate before they banned guns, you can't explain the increase in gun crime...so you keep hyping the already low gun murder rate as an indication that gun control is working....
Since British criminals are using guns more often, not less....gun control is not working...since the point is to keep guns out of the hands of criminals....