Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK
Title and tag for gun? that would be purchase permit.
Firearm training? Agreed
too carry cancel you have to take a test and qualify with the firearm you plan on carrying
Health requirements? The sick and weak need all the help they can get you want to disarm them?
Insurance and renewal? Why do you what to make it so the poor cannot afford to defend themselves? Why do you hate the poor so much?
Title and tag for gun? that would be purchase permit.
Firearm training? Agreed
too carry cancel you have to take a test and qualify with the firearm you plan on carrying
Health requirements? The sick and weak need all the help they can get you want to disarm them?
Insurance and renewal? Why do you what to make it so the poor cannot afford to defend themselves? Why do you hate the poor so much?
The poor depend on cars more than they depend on guns and yet, they are still required to obtain insurance and register their vehicles
My room mate and I have been listening to all the gun control debates, as well as discussing what we've found on various messageboards.
Interestingly enough, when someone starts talking about regulating guns, the rabid right wing starts going into hyperbole mode and saying that there are lots of people killed in driving accidents via DUI, so that means we should tell Ford to quit making cars.
Well......................they might have a point but...........................
When DUI's started to be a problem, they lowered the BAC for DUI from .10 down to .08. Well, that helped to start bringing down deaths from DUI. What is the problem then if we lower the rounds that a magazine can carry down from 30 rounds to only 10? It could save lives.
We also increased the consequences for driving drunk. First time? Your liscence is suspended and you have to pay some hefty fines. If you shoot someone? Your liscence to carry a gun should be suspended and have some hefty fines as well.
If you kill someone because you had a gun? Well.............lets give the jail sentences some good math to follow. Say that the average lifespan is 75. If you kill someone who is 50? You serve 25 years hard time, no parole. You stole 25 years from someone else. If you kill someone who is 75? However many bullet holes are in them, you serve 5 years per hole, as well as 1 year for every bullet you're caught with.
You can see where the math would go if you killed 20 kids who were only 7-10 years old right? The person committing the crime would never be free again.
If you have a gun that someone ripped off of you? Depending on what the circumstances were (i.e. you didn't have them secure) you could serve a portion of the sentence of the shooter.
And yeah...........................that might make people think twice about shooting others.
I would propose that the law require each gun owned to be insured, and allow the private insurance industry to determine the annual fee for each firearm. Let the actuary's determine the risk each type of firearm presents and set the fee. Then, any tort to occur by the use of said firearm by someone who used or who lost (for whatever reason) their gun will be personally liable.
I suspect some firearms would be deemed too dangerous for an insurance company to cover (much like some homeowner polices will not cover pit bulls or Dobermans) and make the ownership of such weapons a fiscal risk. Gun ownership is all about personal responsibility, isn't it?
I also believe a state issued license to own, possess or have in one's custody or control is appropriate and said license can be suspended or revoked for cause (i.e. convictions for DUI, Domestic Violence, any felony or detention in a hospital as a danger to self or others). All to be at the discretion of the individual state, but said license not allow for the transportation to any other state without an official approval by the other state(s).
You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK
A DUI can buy a car
But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads
You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK
A DUI can buy a car
But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads
You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK
A DUI can buy a car
But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads
You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK
A DUI can buy a car
But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads
Wrong, states actually require insurance companies to provide insurance.
You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK
A DUI can buy a car
But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads
Wrong, states actually require insurance companies to provide insurance.
Hell yes
And let's have gun owners insure their guns
You or someone else uses your gun to kill or injure...YOU PAY
Sounds fair to me
You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK
There is in fact a check for DUI when trying to get a license.
Therefore, you can't DRIVE a car if you have a DUI.
Really they will no longer get behind the steering wheel of a car?you can't DRIVE a car if you have a DUI
A DUI can buy a car
But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads
Wrong, states actually require insurance companies to provide insurance.
Hell yes
And let's have gun owners insure their guns
You or someone else uses your gun to kill or injure...YOU PAY
Sounds fair to me
You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK
A DUI can buy a car
But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads
Wrong, states actually require insurance companies to provide insurance.
A DUI can buy a car
But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads
Wrong, states actually require insurance companies to provide insurance.
And when people can't afford it, they quit driving, right?
Wrong. They drive anyway. Same way people will own and carry guns anyway. Because gun laws only affect law abiding citizens, which aren't the ones you're trying to restrict.
Wrong, states actually require insurance companies to provide insurance.
Hell yes
And let's have gun owners insure their guns
You or someone else uses your gun to kill or injure...YOU PAY
Sounds fair to me
OK. If someone steals your car and kills someone, you pay. If someone buys your car and kills someone, you pay. If someone trips in your house and injures himself while trying to rob it, you pay.
Still down with that, Nutwinger?