Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Perhaps the OP would like to explain why he thinks it's a good idea to take away a persons right to self defense when he/she lives in an area prone to violence. Logically, the right to self defense wouldn't really be necessary if you live in a peaceful area, now would it?
And then perhaps he could explain how applying said ban on exercising one's right to self defense should apply to black people and why that would not be racist.
I'D like him to explain how he thinks he's realistically going to impose the ban on dangerous people who are likely to use handguns for crimes, given that said people, by definition, are unlikely to pay any attention to obeying the law.
I'd also like him to explain what it is about Cleveland - any part of it - that makes the law-abiding people (the ones who would be likely to obey such a ban) so scary that they need to be disarmed.
And don't even get me started on the "black people" issue.