Gridlock: Who's fault is it??

[BULLDOG]

Of course Congress is to blame.


Take a look at todays Dem House. All those useless pricks are doing is holding hearings and investigations over something that already been handled.

They aren't concerned with the crisis on the border, which they don't believe is a crisis and they sure aren't concerned with infrastructure or anything else. All they care about is trying to hang something on Trump.

What a useless bunch of assholes and we are paying them. Good Lord.

The right hoped that Barr's misrepresentation of what is in the Mueller report, and Trump constantly chanting his mantra "no collusion, no obstruction" would handle his investigation problems, and that might have worked if the report wasn't available for all to read. You'll note that those that haven't read the report for themselves are the only ones claiming anything has been handled.

So if we believe that the report concluded "no collusion and no obstruction" because it did NOT declare the president guilty of ANY charges, we're wrong?! WTF are you trying to say? Because you didn't declare anything. Where is the report wrong. What crime did Trump commit? Was Mueller obstructed in any way?

Better yet, look at the legality of the Mueller investigation. Was it legitimate? Was there sufficient evidence to warrant an investigation? Was it setup by the Obama administration as the biggest scandal in US history? The deep state coup attempts will be outed shortly with real indictments.

Yes, you are wrong. Mueller clearly said "If it were clear that the president committed no crime, we would have said so" The report also said longstanding policy prevented him from indicting a sitting president. and he didn't think it would be fair to accuse the president without an indictment, but congress would be better equipped to deal with his findings.

The report lists several attempts to obstruct Mueller, The fact that Trump wasn't successful in those attempts doesn't matter. If you try to rob a bank, and fail, you are still guilty of a crime.

Your question as to whether the investigation was even warranted is absurd. There is no doubt that the Russians interfered in our election with the intent of helping Trump had hurting Hillary. Whine all you want, but that is a proven fact. .

1. Mueller's job was to indict or recommend indictment, to prove guilt, he didn't. If Mueller couldn't prove a crime a clown show in congress won't either. Trump is innocent until proven guilty. Dershowitz: Mueller got the law 'all wrong' on obstruction of justice
2. Your "attempts" to obstruct Mueller are not crimes, Mueller was not obstructed, besides there was no underlying crime of "collusion". No one tried to rob a bank, i.e. tried to obstruct Mueller, he had all the time and resources needed to complete the investigation for the AG, who declared "no collusion, no obstruction". End of story.

Again, Mueller was denied the possibility of indicting a sitting president. He stated the preventing policy and made that clear at the first of his report. He thoroughly listed and documented 10 attempts by trump to obstruct his investigation. Come back after you have read the report. .Quoting fox news really isn't proving your point.

 

[BULLDOG]

Of course Congress is to blame.


Take a look at todays Dem House. All those useless pricks are doing is holding hearings and investigations over something that already been handled.

They aren't concerned with the crisis on the border, which they don't believe is a crisis and they sure aren't concerned with infrastructure or anything else. All they care about is trying to hang something on Trump.

What a useless bunch of assholes and we are paying them. Good Lord.

The right hoped that Barr's misrepresentation of what is in the Mueller report, and Trump constantly chanting his mantra "no collusion, no obstruction" would handle his investigation problems, and that might have worked if the report wasn't available for all to read. You'll note that those that haven't read the report for themselves are the only ones claiming anything has been handled.

So if we believe that the report concluded "no collusion and no obstruction" because it did NOT declare the president guilty of ANY charges, we're wrong?! WTF are you trying to say? Because you didn't declare anything. Where is the report wrong. What crime did Trump commit? Was Mueller obstructed in any way?

Better yet, look at the legality of the Mueller investigation. Was it legitimate? Was there sufficient evidence to warrant an investigation? Was it setup by the Obama administration as the biggest scandal in US history? The deep state coup attempts will be outed shortly with real indictments.

Yes, you are wrong. Mueller clearly said "If it were clear that the president committed no crime, we would have said so" The report also said longstanding policy prevented him from indicting a sitting president. and he didn't think it would be fair to accuse the president without an indictment, but congress would be better equipped to deal with his findings.

The report lists several attempts to obstruct Mueller, The fact that Trump wasn't successful in those attempts doesn't matter. If you try to rob a bank, and fail, you are still guilty of a crime.

Your question as to whether the investigation was even warranted is absurd. There is no doubt that the Russians interfered in our election with the intent of helping Trump had hurting Hillary. Whine all you want, but that is a proven fact. .

1. Mueller's job was to indict or recommend indictment, to prove guilt, he didn't. If Mueller couldn't prove a crime a clown show in congress won't either. Trump is innocent until proven guilty. Dershowitz: Mueller got the law 'all wrong' on obstruction of justice
2. Your "attempts" to obstruct Mueller are not crimes, Mueller was not obstructed, besides there was no underlying crime of "collusion". No one tried to rob a bank, i.e. tried to obstruct Mueller, he had all the time and resources needed to complete the investigation for the AG, who declared "no collusion, no obstruction". End of story.

Yup and it took two years and god knows how much tax payer money to complete.

The Dems are still beating the dead horse.

Just shows how out of touch with reality they all are.

How long did they investigate Benghazi?

 

[BULLDOG]

Of course Congress is to blame.


Take a look at todays Dem House. All those useless pricks are doing is holding hearings and investigations over something that already been handled.

They aren't concerned with the crisis on the border, which they don't believe is a crisis and they sure aren't concerned with infrastructure or anything else. All they care about is trying to hang something on Trump.

What a useless bunch of assholes and we are paying them. Good Lord.

The right hoped that Barr's misrepresentation of what is in the Mueller report, and Trump constantly chanting his mantra "no collusion, no obstruction" would handle his investigation problems, and that might have worked if the report wasn't available for all to read. You'll note that those that haven't read the report for themselves are the only ones claiming anything has been handled.

So if we believe that the report concluded "no collusion and no obstruction" because it did NOT declare the president guilty of ANY charges, we're wrong?! WTF are you trying to say? Because you didn't declare anything. Where is the report wrong. What crime did Trump commit? Was Mueller obstructed in any way?

Better yet, look at the legality of the Mueller investigation. Was it legitimate? Was there sufficient evidence to warrant an investigation? Was it setup by the Obama administration as the biggest scandal in US history? The deep state coup attempts will be outed shortly with real indictments.

Yes, you are wrong. Mueller clearly said "If it were clear that the president committed no crime, we would have said so" The report also said longstanding policy prevented him from indicting a sitting president. and he didn't think it would be fair to accuse the president without an indictment, but congress would be better equipped to deal with his findings.

The report lists several attempts to obstruct Mueller, The fact that Trump wasn't successful in those attempts doesn't matter. If you try to rob a bank, and fail, you are still guilty of a crime.

Your question as to whether the investigation was even warranted is absurd. There is no doubt that the Russians interfered in our election with the intent of helping Trump had hurting Hillary. Whine all you want, but that is a proven fact. .

So you got tricked into voting for Trump with funny Russian memes?


.

I'm saying Russia interfered in our election. Only an idiot wouldn't see that as a problem.

 

[Blues Man]

Gridlock is good

The less the government does the richer we the people stay