Her get-out-of-jail card was that she wasn't guilty.
Surely, not even a ding bat believes that.
Not guilty enough to successfully prosecute, yes, I do. And I will believe it if that is what comes back relative to Trump, too.
"Not guilty enough? WTF does that mean? Sure, and OJ was innocent too. What is Trump guilty of? Beating a criminal in a presidential election? You can't do much being a prig and a dingbat.
Not guilty enough? WTF does that mean? Sure, and OJ was innocent too. What is Trump guilty of? Beating a criminal in a presidential election? You can't do much being a prig and a dingbat.
 
Her get-out-of-jail card was that she wasn't guilty.
Surely, not even a ding bat believes that.
Not guilty enough to successfully prosecute, yes, I do. And I will believe it if that is what comes back relative to Trump, too.
It annoys me that someone has decided hat you are qualified to teach the children of others. I am grateful that my son does not attend American public schools and is not influenced by ding bats and prigiish women like you.
 
I'll tell you one thing: If I were governor and I had a vocal group of people calling my residents "foreign invaders," I'd do what I could to protect them, too. You are WAY over the line here.

They are foreign invaders. They came into this country illegally, and they remain here illegally. It is illegal for them to be here, and it is illegal for any American, especially one who holds public office, to help them to remain here.

Mr. Brown's duty—like that of all public officials in this nation—is to the American people, and not to foreigners of any sorts, especially not to those who illegally invade our country.
 
I'll tell you one thing: If I were governor and I had a vocal group of people calling my residents "foreign invaders," I'd do what I could to protect them, too. You are WAY over the line here.

They are foreign invaders. They came into this country illegally, and they remain here illegally. It is illegal for them to be here, and it is illegal for any American, especially one who holds public office, to help them to remain here.

Mr. Brown's duty—like that of all public officials in this nation—is to the American people, and not to foreigners of any sorts, especially not to those who illegally invade our country.
Unfortunately, there is a crop of public school teachers who put their careers of teaching the children of illegals over the welfare of their country, Old Prig is among those.
 
Fairy Moonbeam Brown certainly qualifies for hard prison time, if not a nice jaunt in front of a firing squad.
Calling a pardon "aiding and abetting" criminals is preposterous.

In this case, taken together with his “sanctuary” policies, denying that his conduct constitutes aiding and abetting criminals is preposterous. He is openly taking the side of criminals against that of the law-abiding. He is openly taking the side of foreign invaders against that of his own country and his own fellow Americans. It is preposterous for you to deny that this conduct on his part makes him a criminal and a traitor, who should be treated as such.
Do you know what, exactly, those "sanctuary" policies are? I heard someone going over them a couple weeks ago. California is not refusing to work with ICE. They are refusing to put on ICE jackets and do their work.

I'll tell you one thing: If I were governor and I had a vocal group of people calling my residents "foreign invaders," I'd do what I could to protect them, too. You are WAY over the line here.

I probably wouldn't have pardoned anyone with violent offenses, but the governor does this every year. He must have his reasons and his way of selecting them. I'm no fan of sanctuary cities, but when a bunch of haters get salivating over the hispanics here--what choice do I have but to defend them, at least partially?
so you are ok with foreign invaders???!!!!!!???
 
Fairy Moonbeam Brown certainly qualifies for hard prison time, if not a nice jaunt in front of a firing squad.
Calling a pardon "aiding and abetting" criminals is preposterous.

In this case, taken together with his “sanctuary” policies, denying that his conduct constitutes aiding and abetting criminals is preposterous. He is openly taking the side of criminals against that of the law-abiding. He is openly taking the side of foreign invaders against that of his own country and his own fellow Americans. It is preposterous for you to deny that this conduct on his part makes him a criminal and a traitor, who should be treated as such.
Do you know what, exactly, those "sanctuary" policies are? I heard someone going over them a couple weeks ago. California is not refusing to work with ICE. They are refusing to put on ICE jackets and do their work.

I'll tell you one thing: If I were governor and I had a vocal group of people calling my residents "foreign invaders," I'd do what I could to protect them, too. You are WAY over the line here.

I probably wouldn't have pardoned anyone with violent offenses, but the governor does this every year. He must have his reasons and his way of selecting them. I'm no fan of sanctuary cities, but when a bunch of haters get salivating over the hispanics here--what choice do I have but to defend them, at least partially?

That's all 'sanctuary city' means. That state and local authorities will not become ICE and do their job for them. They cooperate with ICE when the feds come to pick someone up from jail but they don't go round people up for ICE.

Cons, once again, lie through their teeth.
 
There's nothing funnier to me than watching so-called "Constitutionalists" and "State's rights advocates" demanding that an all-powerful federal government come in and assassinate the governor of a state because you don't like his policies.
 
That's what it will take to stop this...jail time and fines...or else it will get out of control...
We don't jail our political opposition in this country, just so you know.
That was Hillary's defense. If being in political opposition is a get-out-of-jail card is justice served?

:lol:

Let's not kid ourselves. You're not looking for "justice".
I am sure you'll deny this, but did you vote for the Beast?
 
That's what it will take to stop this...jail time and fines...or else it will get out of control...
We don't jail our political opposition in this country, just so you know.
That was Hillary's defense. If being in political opposition is a get-out-of-jail card is justice served?

:lol:

Let's not kid ourselves. You're not looking for "justice".
I am sure you'll deny this, but did you vote for the Beast?

:lol:

Nope. I wrote in Bernie.

Do you have another deflection you'd like to try?
 
"Foreign invaders" is a war term, a military term. If you folks are so all fired anxious to shoot someone, jump the next plane to a war zone.
 
Fairy Moonbeam Brown certainly qualifies for hard prison time, if not a nice jaunt in front of a firing squad.
Calling a pardon "aiding and abetting" criminals is preposterous.

In this case, taken together with his “sanctuary” policies, denying that his conduct constitutes aiding and abetting criminals is preposterous. He is openly taking the side of criminals against that of the law-abiding. He is openly taking the side of foreign invaders against that of his own country and his own fellow Americans. It is preposterous for you to deny that this conduct on his part makes him a criminal and a traitor, who should be treated as such.
Do you know what, exactly, those "sanctuary" policies are? I heard someone going over them a couple weeks ago. California is not refusing to work with ICE. They are refusing to put on ICE jackets and do their work.

I'll tell you one thing: If I were governor and I had a vocal group of people calling my residents "foreign invaders," I'd do what I could to protect them, too. You are WAY over the line here.

I probably wouldn't have pardoned anyone with violent offenses, but the governor does this every year. He must have his reasons and his way of selecting them. I'm no fan of sanctuary cities, but when a bunch of haters get salivating over the hispanics here--what choice do I have but to defend them, at least partially?

That's all 'sanctuary city' means. That state and local authorities will not become ICE and do their job for them. They cooperate with ICE when the feds come to pick someone up from jail but they don't go round people up for ICE.

Cons, once again, lie through their teeth.
BULLFNSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
we have criminals--illegals, [ who could very well be terrorists ] and they can't even REPORT who is illegal!!!! they are protecting--protecting illegals----they are not cooperating with ICE at all
this is INSANE
this illegal got $190,000 for ---------------------------being illegal !!!!!!! for just being a criminal
you are saying we should not report CRIMINALS
San Francisco to pay $190,000 for sanctuary law violation, lawyer says
illegal
il·le·gal
i(l)ˈlēɡəl/
adjective
  1. 1.
    contrary to or forbidden by law, especially criminal law.
 
That's what it will take to stop this...jail time and fines...or else it will get out of control...
We don't jail our political opposition in this country, just so you know.

We do jail criminals. And aiding and abetting criminals makes one a criminal. Aiding and abetting foreign invaders makes one a traitor.

Fairy Moonbeam Brown certainly qualifies for hard prison time, if not a nice jaunt in front of a firing squad.
Calling a pardon "aiding and abetting" criminals is preposterous.
When issued for no other reason then to avoid lawful execution of our laws they are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top