That's not what he utteredDonald Trump is a staunch supporter of Social Security and Medicare.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's not what he utteredDonald Trump is a staunch supporter of Social Security and Medicare.
I see your fake news and raise you democrat party destruction against the middle and lower class,,Tax breaks for billionnaires is AOK. Whining about Trans, lets do it. But hold on for one second while we screw our voters over.
GOP faces internal battle over raising age for Social Security
GOP faces internal battle over raising age for Social Security
Republicans are battling among themselves over whether to push reforms to reduce Social Security spending, with some conservatives rallying around the idea of raising the retirement age. Republican…thehill.com
Actions speak loudly, and he did nothing to harm either program.That's not what he uttered
The The House however wants to do it.Actions speak loudly, and he did nothing to harm either program.
Since when do the swamp reptiles ever adhere to the rules that they've made?The Social Security Act requires that it be self-funding.
You wieners have been saying that for 40 years.The The House however wants to do it.
Yet another valid reason to not vote for Republicans.Work till you die.....You will own nothing and be happy.....Eat bugs and drink soy milk.....The beatings will continue till morale improves.
All typical dem mantras.
Nope. More election year scare tactics aimed at the gullible leftards. Works every time.Tax breaks for billionnaires is AOK. Whining about Trans, lets do it. But hold on for one second while we screw our voters over.
GOP faces internal battle over raising age for Social Security
GOP faces internal battle over raising age for Social Security
Republicans are battling among themselves over whether to push reforms to reduce Social Security spending, with some conservatives rallying around the idea of raising the retirement age. Republican…thehill.com
Not a lie and you fuckers have been attacking So pal Security ever since it began 100 years ago./----/ You asswipes have been spreading that lie for decades.
It has already been spent buying votes....It's all gone and not coming back.Paying back the $2.908 trillion that has been borrowed from the social security trust fund by the government would be a good place to start.
Myth #5: The government raids Social Security to pay for other programsIt has already been spent buying votes....It's all gone and not coming back.
Just have your pants-pooping pedo "president" print up some more money!
The OASI "trust fund" is filled with the same IOUs that the BRICS nations are converting into gold, Dudley.Myth #5: The government raids Social Security to pay for other programs
The facts: The two trust funds that pay out Social Security benefits — one for retirees and their survivors, the other for people with disabilities — have never been part of the federal government's general fund. Social Security is a separate, self-funded program. The federal government does, however, borrow from Social Security.
Here's how: Social Security's tax revenue is, by law, invested in special U.S. Treasury securities. As with all Treasury bonds, the federal government can spend the proceeds on a variety of programs. But as with all bondholders, Treasury has to pay the money back, with interest. Social Security redeems the securities to pay benefits.
This borrowing fuels the notion that the government is raiding or even stealing from Social Security and leaving it with nothing but IOUs. But the government has always made full repayment, and the interest increases Social Security's assets, to the tune of $66.4 billion in 2022.
I do 'do right' but I'm not Canadian lol.The OASI "trust fund" is filled with the sane IOUs that the BRICS nations are converting into gold, Dudley.
You're going to get nothing more than a wheelbarrow full of FRNs that aren't worth a roll of TP.
I highlighted your error. That means the rest of your post is irrelevant.Again and again, I have to ask myself, are Democrats/Leftists really that stupid?
In no changes are made, the Social Security "trust fund*" will be depleted in the foreseeable future. Because SS is unconstitutional, funding CANNOT be supplemented with funds from the General Fund, so it must not be allowed to run dry. If it were to run dry, the system would have to revert to a pay-as-you-go mode, which would reduce monthly benefits to about 80% of what they are now. That would result in a lot of complaints, but most geezers would be fine.
So it is inevitable that sometime in the next few years a BI-PARTISAN congressional committee will go into a figurative smoke-filled room and devise a scheme to keep the "trust fund" solvent. That scheme will include one or more of the following changes:
BOTH parties will sign off on the ultimate package, and EVERYONE will complain that it is "unfair." But NOBODY's MONTHLY "CHECK" will be reduced, ever.
- An increase in the amount of earnings that are subject to the FICA tax (or an elimination of the cap altogether),
- A slight and possibly progressive raising of the age when one can collect "full benefits,"
- A change in the formula that calculates the annual COLA adjustment, and/or
- A slight increase in the tax rate, for either the employee, the employer, or both.
Democrats ALWAYS claim that the GOP wants to "cut Social Security," and it is always a lie. How fucking stupid do you have to be in order to believe it?
_______________________
* It is not actually a trust fund. NOBODY has any vested interest in a single dime in the Social Security trust fund. Congress can increase payments, decrease payments, or stop payments altogether, and there ain't a fucking thing anybody can do about it. And when you die, even after paying hundreds of thousands into SS, you heirs will get, at most, a pittance. This is how we know it ain't a trust fund.
WTF are you blabbering about?I do 'do right' but I'm not Canadian lol.
That would be done anyway. Why not come up with an original idea for once?Paying back the $2.908 trillion that has been borrowed from the social security trust fund by the government would be a good place to start.
You called me Dudley (Do Right).WTF are you blabbering about?