GOP Virtually Unanimously Refused To Cut Taxes

[mascale]

So, with more than $250.0 bil. of the Stimulus left to spend, $145.0 bil. in grants and contracts included: All Republicans up for re-election, and likely any new ones now campaigning--All refused to cut the federal taxes last year! That is the kinds of families they are! They voted against federal tax reductions, especially any supportive of business.

$223B in Tax Relief

Some of the tax cuts funding is yet to happen: That all GOP candidates do not want Americans to have! GOP mainly voted against the Stimulus, source of the tax cuts and the Refundable Income Tax Credit, of Make Work Pay for the employed. That actually sets up a basis for National Cost-of-Living-Adjustment,(COLA), properly computed. There is a wrongly computed COLA in Social Security, which Nixon did. Teachers all support what Nixon did. All GOP wamt to be like Nixon, or least like George Bush I, or II.

GOP voted against having U. S. based corporations build cars. GOP can even give a bad name, to their leaders(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(GOP send squaws to many nations, only with trinkets money--which is the only money they believe in. Democrats bring much monehy and cash, instead! Only trinkets are supported by GOP, "management" people!)

 

[AllieBaba]

So..define "virtually" unanimously.

And I followed the link and found nothing that supports the op. It's a pie chart.

 

[cad]

tax cuts only favor rich people.

if we want to stimulate the economy, we need to raise taxes like clinton did.

26 million jobs created.

nuff said

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

tax cuts only favor rich people.

if we want to stimulate the economy, we need to raise taxes like clinton did.

26 million jobs created.

nuff said

Sure.... just not on you I'm betting.

Leach.

 

[cad]

tax cuts only favor rich people.

if we want to stimulate the economy, we need to raise taxes like clinton did.

26 million jobs created.

nuff said

Sure.... just not on you I'm betting.

Leach.

26 millions jobs!!!

budget surplus!!!!

 

[mascale]

The Refundable Tax Credit is actually a great, and socialist, modern advance in all of economic history. It is basis for a National Cost-Of-Living-Adjustment, on an equal-amount kind of basis. Generally, a price rise for one is a price rise for all. The price of a Lamborghini increases $20,000.00. Generally the poor have to pay that, too: Even after the lottery event.

Clinton's variation was an equal amount per child income tax credit, at $500.00 or so.

Nixon had imposed voluntary, fixed percentage, wage and price guidelines instead. Senator McGovern had proposed providing $1000.00 for every man, woman, and child in America.

Guess what would come of that, just today!?! Senator McGovern was a liberal Democrat, doing Great Socialist, interventions in national economies. Gerald Ford, as President, would follow along the Great Socialist leadership with income tax rebates. Others would follow the Great Socialist leadership along.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Conservatives do tend to the Presbyterian model of Commodity Money in "Wealth of Nations!" That was of the time when even all France even knew that the "State" was in fact, the royal family--and not any Americans at all!)

 

[haileydavey]

tax cuts only favor rich people.

if we want to stimulate the economy, we need to raise taxes like clinton did.

26 million jobs created.

nuff said

Sure.... just not on you I'm betting.

Leach.

26 millions jobs!!!

budget surplus!!!!

Who was in charge of congress when all this happened? That is where you will find out who was really responsible.

 

[mascale]

Who was in office, and who signed what, finally didn't much matter at all.

The stock markets all paid attention to the balanced budget, and the bubble then burst at the last years of the Clinton Administration. Things got so bad that computers in Florida even had trouble counting ballots!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(And so after dimpled chads became widely fashionable, "political capital," then the Conservatives would again want commodity money to run the world--instead of what they got, apparently!_

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

tax cuts only favor rich people.

if we want to stimulate the economy, we need to raise taxes like clinton did.

26 million jobs created.

nuff said

Clinton raising the income tax is not what created jobs.

 

[mascale]

Mrs. Obama famously. . . .works. . . .in the garden, doing female things(?)! POTUS Obama is then free to do other things(?)!

In the Ford Administration, and in the closing days of the Nixon Adminstration, disgraced before it: The United States had the option of $300.0 bil. annual deficits to prevent a major downturn, or $300.0 bil. annual deficits to bail-out of a major downturn. "The Reagan Trajectory," would not go that far along with it, but gave it a start. Black Teenage unemployment exceeded 50%, and the famous gang-banger sub-culture wars got under way. Not even submariner, James Carter would go that far into recession prevention before Reagan. In fact, like the banks now, Carter even froze all the credit cards.

The Total Credit Market was widely understood, except that the Ford Administration would do equal dollar tax rebates. Alabama teachers would all get $1000.00 annual bonuses, regardless of pay grade. Jerry Brown, then Governor, would provide equal amount bonuses for California state employees.

Clinton would finally approach the $300.0 bil. deficit spending levels, and would provide an equal dollar tax credit, per child, on the more recurring basis. The Credit Market concept was coming into its own. University Faculty, (Indiana University, Bloomington, Political Science), had bonged the whole concept in 1971-73 time frame. No doctorate would be conferred.

Then the Bogus Administration came into office, paying attention as was usual and customary for the family.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Mostly, the Ivy League educated do tolerate the concept of teenage blacks slaughtering one another, as the preferred alternative. Hollywood--likely even Nashville--makes kazillions from them! And then it's on to the clothing manufacturers, and then on to the Obama Adminisgtration, and Yee--Haaawwww! Colored Entertainer families even drawing high pay--all supportive of the law, just like the Ivy League. . . .et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, (bald guys, too)!

 

[editec]

So, with more than $250.0 bil. of the Stimulus left to spend, $145.0 bil. in grants and contracts included: All Republicans up for re-election, and likely any new ones now campaigning--All refused to cut the federal taxes last year! That is the kinds of families they are! They voted against federal tax reductions, especially any supportive of business.

$223B in Tax Relief

Some of the tax cuts funding is yet to happen: That all GOP candidates do not want Americans to have! GOP mainly voted against the Stimulus, source of the tax cuts and the Refundable Income Tax Credit, of Make Work Pay for the employed. That actually sets up a basis for National Cost-of-Living-Adjustment,(COLA), properly computed. There is a wrongly computed COLA in Social Security, which Nixon did. Teachers all support what Nixon did. All GOP wamt to be like Nixon, or least like George Bush I, or II.

GOP voted against having U. S. based corporations build cars. GOP can even give a bad name, to their leaders(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(GOP send squaws to many nations, only with trinkets money--which is the only money they believe in. Democrats bring much monehy and cash, instead! Only trinkets are supported by GOP, "management" people!)

Same old story...

Spend and borrow Republicans.

Nice people most rank and file Republicans, but their leadship spends money like drunken sailors.

No wait! The RNC is even worse than drunken sailors since they prefer to borrow money to spend today rather than paying for the bills as they spend it.

But to be fair, they have plenty of help spending the money from the DNC, too.

The primary difference is the Ds typically want to pay for the spending by taxing people.

 

[code1211]

tax cuts only favor rich people.

if we want to stimulate the economy, we need to raise taxes like clinton did.

26 million jobs created.

nuff said

If Clinton and Robert Reuban know how to stimulate the economy and are withholding the secret, this is tantamount to treason.

If these two know how to stimulate the economy and have offered to do it for the Big 0, he has obviously blocked their efforts and, again, treason. Maybe not treason, just outlandish stupidity or agenda driven stupidity.

If Clinton and Reuban were just the pair that happened to be there when the dot.com bubble inflated, accept that for what it was and STFU about economic policy!

The rooster crows when the Sun rises. It's going to rise whether he crows or not.

 

[mascale]

In the great world of opinionated. . . .really big, really big. . .donkey do-do makers: A shouting match even: Rarely wins.

Actually, the teachers are the real cause of it all. They continued to grade right from wrong, where doing wrong is actually grade right.

Arithmetic in wage rates is not a faculty strong-suit--unless they get to keep it!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Bogus Administration even thought dimpled chads created political capital!)

 

[Jon]

The primary difference is the Ds typically want to pay for the spending by taxing people.

Somewhat true, but this administration is unique in that it wants to spend WAY MORE than it wants to tax. Clinton had the right idea, but that seems to have been lost in the past decade.

 

[mascale]

The Obama Administration Stimulus created the Refundable Tax Credit, so that people with no income tax liability still got an extra bonus at filing, or in withholding.

40% or more of U. S. federal income tax filers have no liability for taxes, and then providing a credit would not be said evidence that the Democrats intend tax increases for those people.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great White Eyes in advertising now send Marlboro Man with rotted corn and poison blankets of peace(?)! Or, Maybe Great Bogus Administration, "Shock and Awe" was sent to provide live military, invasion targets instead(?)!

 

[cad]

obama's definition of paying for something:

26 bilion to save union jobs.
pay for it by cutting food stamps in 2014!!

does anyone really think, if the dems are in control in 2014, they're going to let those cuts actually happen?

 

[Avorysuds]

tax cuts only favor rich people.

if we want to stimulate the economy, we need to raise taxes like clinton did.

26 million jobs created.

nuff said

Sure.... just not on you I'm betting.

Leach.

26 millions jobs!!!

budget surplus!!!!

I thought it was the .com and Housing bubble back to back that caused jobs... Oh and what surplus? When you say surplus do you mean the moving of monies to different areas of debt to make it look like we he had a surplus, on his last year in office... that would show up next year that he was out of office? That surplus?

Here, a link to help... Try and read it! The Myth of the Clinton Surplus

 

[Avorysuds]

tax cuts only favor rich people.

if we want to stimulate the economy, we need to raise taxes like clinton did.

26 million jobs created.

nuff said

Sure.... just not on you I'm betting.

Leach.

26 millions jobs!!!

budget surplus!!!!

I feel I should add this… The reason the money debt was shifted around was to make it appear that Clinton had a surplus. From my understanding SS was raided to help push down the debt even further despite the fact that the money was simple once again shifted from one place to another… an IOU to SS, still 100% debt money. Anyways, the reason this was all done was for people like you. See, they knew there was a demographic of people out there that would never stop regurgitating false information due to an “I’m smarter or more educated than you” mentality despite having clearly the wrong answer.

You’re “job” was to spread false information to other people who will never spend the time to understand what really was going on so that they too will regurgitate false information and in the end vote for a Democrat and hate on Republicans.

I’m not saying all this to defend Republicans, just pointing out that your lack of knowledge and more so your desire to NOT want the correct knowledge was what Clinton and his advisors were counting on.

Being you are wrong, undoubtedly wrong about the “surplus” part of you statement why would I trust the other half of the statement that taxes is what created jobs when I already know that’s not the correct answer again.

 

[mascale]

Senator Moynihan--who is now dead and not late for anything--had been a part of the ploy to raise Social Security Taxes, and create the giant fund. Soon after he would commence his complaint that the Reagan Administration was using the Social Security Trust Fund to pay for B-1 bombers.

Others noticed.

Why should I pay social security? It is not like I will ever see that money thanks to Slick Wille.?

As noted, the accounting trick had been noticed right away. "B-1 Bombers," of course, is what Republicans call, "infrastructure."

It started with Reagan.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Clever Ron, who raised all the Social Security taxes on the payroll taxed families, and cut taxes for the rich with the proceeds--and bought federal defense procurements, with all the money! The is an admired device in the Obama Administration--called, "The Entreprenerial Spirt," of "The Reagan Trajectory," aka, Harvard Business School, or some such thing. Harvard Business School is where the various Doctor,"MBa" are known to practice. That is 'Mmmm-Bah," like of the credentialled in the Bogus Administration, just recently ended! People need to recall this the GOP is the Party of Abraham Lincoln!)