- Banned
- #41
and you still haven't expalined why Bush has not sent in a whole bunch of troops to stop the slaughter in Darfur.....
or are you saying that the slaughter of innocents is unimportant to your side?
are you saying that even though Saddam had no WMD's no connections to 9/11, no alliances with Aq... that staying there rather than admitting we fucked up by going in the first place - and trying to avoid further reducing the alreadly minuscule credibility of the nearly defunct republican party is reason enough to keep grinding up American lives in Iraq and ignoring the destruction in Darfur?
or are you saying that the slaughter of innocents is unimportant to your side?
are you saying that even though Saddam had no WMD's no connections to 9/11, no alliances with Aq... that staying there rather than admitting we fucked up by going in the first place - and trying to avoid further reducing the alreadly minuscule credibility of the nearly defunct republican party is reason enough to keep grinding up American lives in Iraq and ignoring the destruction in Darfur?