Horseshit and deflection dweeb.
So tell me Thomas, as a "originalist", what would you do if elected. Humor me.
You know where *MY* site is if you want to know *MY* stand dweeb.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Horseshit and deflection dweeb.
So tell me Thomas, as a "originalist", what would you do if elected. Humor me.
You know where *MY* site is if you want to know *MY* stand dweeb.
It figures all I get is deflection on this one though. Especially when it comes to the source. People need to learn the difference between a opinion piece and a piece that reports facts.
By the way, I find the irony delicious in those that are complaining about the source are never around when someone here posts something from freerepublic or WND. Interesting.
It figures all I get is deflection on this one though. Especially when it comes to the source. People need to learn the difference between a opinion piece and a piece that reports facts.
By the way, I find the irony delicious in those that are complaining about the source are never around when someone here posts something from freerepublic or WND. Interesting.
You are the one that sets the stage by routinely claiming someone else's source is no good even when it is the truth.
You have rdean to thank for that.
Or people could just take responsibility and not be hypocrites. You won't find me posting DailyKos, or a left wing opinion piece on here. The one time I did? It was about how Liberals should be more Pro-Gun because of the 2nd Amendment, which I agreed with.
So I find people taking issue with the source while not decrying the others to be hilarious.
You are the one that sets the stage by routinely claiming someone else's source is no good even when it is the truth.
I thought I was very direct and factual in post #25.
At this point, is there really any excuse for the obstructionism, other than to just say the Dems didn't get anything done?
The bill -- a re-authorization of the 2007 COMPETES Act -- has been supported by interests usually seen as aligned with Republicans, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
GOP yesterday killed a House bill that would increase funding for scientific research and math and science education
I'm sorry, folks, but the whinging about not having money to pay for "increased funding" has just BUGUN.
I thought I was very direct and factual in post #25.
My problem (and as it should be your problem as well) with this move is making amendments to bills that have nothing to do with the bills themselves.
And yet we have NEVER seen you complain when the Democrats do JUST that. Only when a Republican manages it. I wonder why that is?
I'm sorry, folks, but the whinging about not having money to pay for "increased funding" has just BUGUN.
Not really. It will just be bills that are rejected that one side doesn't agree with. Congress will continue to buy stuff for the Military that the Pentagon neither wants or needs.
And yet we have NEVER seen you complain when the Democrats do JUST that. Only when a Republican manages it. I wonder why that is?
Except I have. When Pelosi was making stupid comments and adding things into the HC Bill, I said she was a and I quote "fucking idiot". I stand by those comments.
And to turn the tables over, I never see you do it when a Republican does it. Here's an opportunity RGS.
LMAO! Trollometer is maxing out at 10, now.
Conjecture, based on??
Niether you or I know what "Congress will continue" to do.
However, the need to cut government spending, NOW, is indisputable.
The "stimulous packages" are failing, or have not had the desired effect. Its not too late, yet, to change course.
I happen to think this one was the right one to stop, BUT thanks for playing. We have no money, there should be no increases for anything until we have a balanced budget. Obama and the dems seem to think we can just print all the new money we want.
I support an Amendment to the US Constitution that requires that every proposed bill in either house must list the power granted to create said bill from the Constitution. And the same for any amendment to any bill.
I support an Amendment to the US Constitution that requires a balanced budget with only the Military needs of the Nation overriding that.
My ass, you're trying to have a serious discussion.LMAO! Trollometer is maxing out at 10, now.
Modo, your pitiful attempts to mark me as a troll fail when I'm trying to have a serious discussion. I see you want no part of that though.
My ass, you're trying to have a serious discussion.
Your OP set the tone. Trolling. Nothing more.
At this point, I doubt you even have the capacity to see that. Of course, you are NEVER wrong, ESPECIALLY when women call you out.