GOP Broden: Violent Revolution Is "On the Table"

[Revere]

The government that does not follow the Constitution certifies people to teach the Constitution?

What a concept.

So tell us, what remedies did the founders prescribe for tyranny?

Point out the exact clause in the United States Constitution that allows for a violent uprising of citizens against the federal government. Or state government. Or local government.

Feel free. Please.

I did not say it was in the Constitution.

It's in the Declaration of Independence.

 

[LiberalNut]

If you disarm the People,there can be no chance of violent revolution.

Right now, today, with the second amendment as a personal right, there is no chance of violent revolution. None. Your weapons and your training are no match for the armed forces of the United States. This is not the musket age. This is the age of smart bombs, supersonic strike aircraft, M1A1 Abrams tanks and more. Your delusion of a band of idiots who hang out in the woods, practicing bad small unit tactics are gonna overthrow the government of the United States is a fucking joke. It aint happenin' I'd love for you to try though. Oooo, how I would love that.

Please try it.

 

[Revere]

The founding fathers foresaw tyrants like Obama. That's why they gave us a government of laws, and not men, and limited government's power.

If you're a real history teacher, you'd know that.

If not, then you belive government has no limits.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Some of this current President's bestest buddies like William Ayers,fully advocated Violent Revolution back in the day and they're doing pretty good these days. Many of them have nice cushy teaching jobs in our Universities or are serving in this Administration. So I see no problem with what this man is saying. In fact i applaud him. It's a great discussion topic. Just remember,an armed Citizenry is the ultimate Check & Balance on our Government. And our Founding Fathers knew this very well.

 

[Revere]

If you're a history teacher that believes the Constitution gives the government no limits, then your "certificate" belongs back in the Cracker Jack box.

 

[code1211]

In the spirit of the thoughts of Jeffereson, though, a revolution every couple of decades was pretty much what he was endorsing.

Later in his life, after witnessing the horrors of the French Revolution, Jefferson retracted and denounced his earlier words on this subject. But righties aren't into actual history. To listen to them, you'd think there was never a federalist/anti-federalist schism right from the beginnings of our nation.

Anyone who has read the Federalist Papers and the Bill of Rights would not think this.

The framers built into our Constitution the tools needed to execute a bloodless revolution. As a republic, we can convene to end the government we have and raise up a new one in its place.

Is there a reason that you feel the need to throw stones instead of simply engaging in the marketplace of ideas?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I seriously doubt that the military would go against its own citizenry if the leaders of this country resorted to violence against its citizens.

You're in la-la land. The military will perform it's constitutional duties and put down any domestic attempt at violent overthrow of the constitutionally elected government. Any insurrection would go down in bloody ruin, very quickly.

Sorry, but the only people who would go down in the bloody mess would the perpetrators(leaders) of such violence.

 

[code1211]

Why obey a government that doesn't obey the Constutution?

Clearly..it didn't under Bush. I can point that out.

Clearly..it does under Obama..and I can point that out.

Feel free to do the same. I love arguing the United States Constitution.

What practices that were ongoing under Bush were ended under Obama?

 

[Revere]

Why obey a government that doesn't obey the Constutution?

Clearly..it didn't under Bush. I can point that out.

Clearly..it does under Obama..and I can point that out.

Feel free to do the same. I love arguing the United States Constitution.

What practices that were ongoing under Bush were ended under Obama?

Not a damn one. In fact, Obama doubled down on everything Bush did.

 

[LiberalNut]

Do it wingnuts. Take up your pop guns. Attempt your violent revolution. I'm laughing at you.

 

[LiberalNut]

What practices that were ongoing under Bush were ended under Obama?

Torture.

 

[Revere]

There's no evidence anything has changed with respect to the CIA's intelligence gathering.

In fact, Obama is now ordering the assassination of Americans overseas.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Actually, the joke will be on the statists that take the side of the govt if ever an insurrection occurs with the majority of the people.

 

[LiberalNut]

The framers built into our Constitution the tools needed to execute a bloodless revolution. As a republic, we can convene to end the government we have and raise up a new one in its place.

Of course. That isn't what the other idiots are talking about though. They are talking about VIOLENT revolution. They are openly advocating for the violent overthrow of the Constitutional government. They are advocating committing treason.

I want them to try. Honestly, I do. It's time to rid our nation of this insanity and if they actually have the balls to do what they advocate (which they don't of course) I will participate and revel in their deaths.

 

[Revere]

Obama is killing civilians by the dozens with drone attacks inside Pakistan, more than ever before.

 

[Revere]

The framers built into our Constitution the tools needed to execute a bloodless revolution. As a republic, we can convene to end the government we have and raise up a new one in its place.

Of course. That isn't what the other idiots are talking about though. They are talking about VIOLENT revolution. They are openly advocating for the violent overthrow of the Constitutional government. They are advocating committing treason.

I want them to try. Honestly, I do. It's time to rid our nation of this insanity and if they actually have the balls to do what they advocate 9which they don't of course) I will participate and revel in their deaths.

Oh, look at the chickenhawk.

He can't say anything good about the US military anywhere else in the world, but wants it to fire on American citizens.

 

[Revere]

Even the fucking Soviets didn't do that in 1991.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

I think it's pretty funny watching Socialist/Progressive stooges bitching about what this guy is saying while ignoring the fact that some of their Hopey Changey One's best friends are staunch advocates of Violent Revolution. William Ayers is just one but there are many others. In fact many of these "Revolutionaries" are currently serving in his Administration. So what are they really bitching about? Is it only because a Republican is discussing it? I'm pretty sure that's it. I like this guy. I would like to hear more from him.

 

[Sallow]

The government that does not follow the Constitution certifies people to teach the Constitution?

What a concept.

So tell us, what remedies did the founders prescribe for tyranny?

Point out the exact clause in the United States Constitution that allows for a violent uprising of citizens against the federal government. Or state government. Or local government.

Feel free. Please.

I did not say it was in the Constitution.

It's in the Declaration of Independence.

Specifically..the Declaration of Independence was referring to the British.

The Constitution is supreme in matters of law.

 

[Revere]

Point out the exact clause in the United States Constitution that allows for a violent uprising of citizens against the federal government. Or state government. Or local government.

Feel free. Please.

I did not say it was in the Constitution.

It's in the Declaration of Independence.

Specifically..the Declaration of Independence was referring to the British.

The Constitution is supreme in matters of law.

Again the Constitution is only a defense for a government that complies with it.

The British were the government at that time.

Know what "consent of the governed" means?