- Thread starter
- #61
Read post 53.What about "creators" (plural)?Correct, every athiest and religious person thinks they are right. That's why as an agnostic I studied all religions to draw my own conclusions.Why believe in someone else's conception of "God" when you don't know any details about a "God"?Just because God is unknowable in our limited understanding does not mean God does not exist. Scientists have mathematical proof there are dozens of dimensions. The math is beyond my understanding but I also believe they are telling the truth.Neither theism or atheism is fully rational. Even trying to define "God " is irrational.Belief in God is far more rational than atheism.
I was agnostic for my first 35 years. Then I figured I better do my homework and answer the ultimate issue. Good luck.
Why not be HONEST?
We don't kmow.
Using a God-of-the-gaps rational to support one's beliefs is a reflection of stupid ignorance.
Smart ignorance + honesty = agnosticm. The scientific view.
You must be getting fearful in your old age!
Why not believe in multiple Gods or gods?
Why not be HONEST?
We don't know jack about our origins.
However, like in science, we can have theories, but they need evidence, along with speculation.
.
The OP is merely about a creator vs an accidental something becoming life.
We don't know, right?