Go on, fire Mueller and see what happens.....

[rightwinger]

If trump cultists on here want to make the special counsel's job MUCH easier in the upcoming obstruction of justice charges, DO FIRE Mueller and see what happens.....

First, the charge of obstructing justice is thereby proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Second, states' will pick up the investigations against individuals in the Trump entourage...and THAT means NO pardons.

Third, the repercussions reminiscent of Nixon's "Saturday night's massacre" will fall upon Congress who will be placed into such a no-win spot, that fearing for their own sorry asses in any upcoming election, will have to begin impeachment proceedings.

So, by all means, fire Mueller and enjoy the fallout..........LOL

Firing Comey worked out so well for Trump

Firing Mueller would leave Congress with no choice but to impeach for obstruction

B.S.

Alan Dershowitz on Trump & obstruction of justice:

On the Fox & Friends segment, Dershowitz argued Trump had not obstructed justice—and that it was nearly impossible for a president to be guilty of obstruction short of literally destroying physical evidence. Charging Trump with obstruction of justice even though he was “exercising his constitutional authority under Article II” would actually lead to a constitutional crisis, he argued.

BTW... Dershowitz is a flaming liberal and a real constitutional scholar.

Dershowitz: No Case For Obstruction Of Justice Against Trump, Would Be "Constitutional Crisis"

Dershowitz is a paid conservative shill

He also told us OJ was innocent

 

[LordBrownTrout]

If trump cultists on here want to make the special counsel's job MUCH easier in the upcoming obstruction of justice charges, DO FIRE Mueller and see what happens.....

First, the charge of obstructing justice is thereby proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Second, states' will pick up the investigations against individuals in the Trump entourage...and THAT means NO pardons.

Third, the repercussions reminiscent of Nixon's "Saturday night's massacre" will fall upon Congress who will be placed into such a no-win spot, that fearing for their own sorry asses in any upcoming election, will have to begin impeachment proceedings.

So, by all means, fire Mueller and enjoy the fallout..........LOL

Mueller is corrupt and desperately trying to cover up the collusion with russia that happened under O and clinton. Yes, he needs to be fired and then investigated.

 

[OKTexas]

If trump cultists on here want to make the special counsel's job MUCH easier in the upcoming obstruction of justice charges, DO FIRE Mueller and see what happens.....

First, the charge of obstructing justice is thereby proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Second, states' will pick up the investigations against individuals in the Trump entourage...and THAT means NO pardons.

Third, the repercussions reminiscent of Nixon's "Saturday night's massacre" will fall upon Congress who will be placed into such a no-win spot, that fearing for their own sorry asses in any upcoming election, will have to begin impeachment proceedings.

So, by all means, fire Mueller and enjoy the fallout..........LOL

Nice conspiracy theory there child, no one in authority is talking about firing Mueller.


.

 

[tinydancer]

Why fire Mueller? Get another special counsel to investigate Mueller, Rosenstein AND Weisman for their roles in the Uranium deal. Make Mueller feel the heat.

 

[tinydancer]

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Wednesday (yesterday) that he has seen no good cause to fire Robert Mueller from his role as special counsel in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Rosenstein faced tough questions from Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday amid revelations that FBI officials on Mueller’s team had exhibited political bias. President Trump’s allies have seized on the reports to discredit the investigation.

Rosenstein on Wednesday defended the special counsel, telling ranking member Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) that he has seen no good cause to fire Mueller.

The deputy attorney general, who is overseeing the Russia probe after Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, told lawmakers that Mueller had taken the appropriate action by firing an FBI agent on the investigation over anti-Trump text messages he had sent to a colleague during the campaign.

“Have you seen good cause to fire special counsel Mueller?” Nadler asked Rosenstein.

“No,” Rosenstein replied.

Later, when asked what he would do if he were directed to fire Mueller, Rosenstein replied, “I would follow the regulation. If there were good cause, I would act. If there were no good cause, I would not.”

The deputy attorney general then repeated that he had not seen good cause to fire Mueller.

Later, Rosenstein spoke highly of Mueller when asked to explain the characteristics that qualified him to be appointed special counsel.

“Based upon his reputation, his service, his patriotism, and his experience with the department and the FBI, I believe he was an ideal choice for this task,” Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein said.


Deputy attorney general says no cause to fire Mueller

Rosenstein is deeply involved with Mueller in Uranium One. What do you think he would say?



Corrupt Democrat sons of bitches and don't hand me that shit that Mueller is a Republican.

 

[Rambunctious]

NO, moron, the firing of Comey and the recusal by Sessions.... PROMPTED the appointment of an independent special prosecutor....a damn REPUBLICAN, no less.

Firing Comey the Clown was not obstruction of justice....everyone has said so even liberal Trump hating legal beagles on the tube...

 

[Rambunctious]

Gee, I asked the same things after $110 MILLION was spent on Benghazi....

Americans were killed in Benghazi bozo....worth every penny...

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

If trump cultists on here want to make the special counsel's job MUCH easier in the upcoming obstruction of justice charges, DO FIRE Mueller and see what happens.....

First, the charge of obstructing justice is thereby proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Second, states' will pick up the investigations against individuals in the Trump entourage...and THAT means NO pardons.

Third, the repercussions reminiscent of Nixon's "Saturday night's massacre" will fall upon Congress who will be placed into such a no-win spot, that fearing for their own sorry asses in any upcoming election, will have to begin impeachment proceedings.

So, by all means, fire Mueller and enjoy the fallout..........LOL

Firing Comey worked out so well for Trump

Firing Mueller would leave Congress with no choice but to impeach for obstruction

B.S.

Alan Dershowitz on Trump & obstruction of justice:

On the Fox & Friends segment, Dershowitz argued Trump had not obstructed justice—and that it was nearly impossible for a president to be guilty of obstruction short of literally destroying physical evidence. Charging Trump with obstruction of justice even though he was “exercising his constitutional authority under Article II” would actually lead to a constitutional crisis, he argued.

BTW... Dershowitz is a flaming liberal and a real constitutional scholar.

Dershowitz: No Case For Obstruction Of Justice Against Trump, Would Be "Constitutional Crisis"

Dershowitz is a paid conservative shill

He also told us OJ was innocent

Oh please.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

NO, moron, the firing of Comey and the recusal by Sessions.... PROMPTED the appointment of an independent special prosecutor....a damn REPUBLICAN, no less.

Firing Comey the Clown was not obstruction of justice....everyone has said so even liberal Trump hating legal beagles on the tube...

Yeah, exercising his constitutionally granted authority is not OOJ.

Ac cording to Alan Dershowitz:

On the Fox & Friends segment, Dershowitz argued Trump had not obstructed justice—and that it was nearly impossible for a president to be guilty of obstruction short of literally destroying physical evidence. Charging Trump with obstruction of justice even though he was “exercising his constitutional authority under Article II” would actually lead to a constitutional crisis, he argued.

For obstruction of justice by the president, you need clearly illegal acts. With Nixon, hush money paid, telling people to lie, destroying evidence. Even with Clinton, they said that he tried to influence potential witnesses not to tell the truth. But there’s never been a case in history where a president has been charged with obstruction of justice for merely exercising his constitutional authority.

 

[Valerie]

Rosenstein is deeply involved with Mueller in Uranium One. What do you think he would say?



Corrupt Democrat sons of bitches and don't hand me that shit that Mueller is a Republican.

the knee bone is connected to the elbow! OMFG!! the entire skeleton is corrupt!!!

 

[rightwinger]

NO, moron, the firing of Comey and the recusal by Sessions.... PROMPTED the appointment of an independent special prosecutor....a damn REPUBLICAN, no less.

Firing Comey the Clown was not obstruction of justice....everyone has said so even liberal Trump hating legal beagles on the tube...

Yeah, exercising his constitutionally granted authority is not OOJ.

Ac cording to Alan Dershowitz:

On the Fox & Friends segment, Dershowitz argued Trump had not obstructed justice—and that it was nearly impossible for a president to be guilty of obstruction short of literally destroying physical evidence. Charging Trump with obstruction of justice even though he was “exercising his constitutional authority under Article II” would actually lead to a constitutional crisis, he argued.

For obstruction of justice by the president, you need clearly illegal acts. With Nixon, hush money paid, telling people to lie, destroying evidence. Even with Clinton, they said that he tried to influence potential witnesses not to tell the truth. But there’s never been a case in history where a president has been charged with obstruction of justice for merely exercising his constitutional authority.

I hope Trump is listening that it is impossible for him to obstruct justice

 

[Rambunctious]

I hope Trump is listening that it is impossible for him to obstruct justice

It's not impossible but a president would really need to screw up bad to be guilty of it...

 

[rightwinger]

I hope Trump is listening that it is impossible for him to obstruct justice

It's not impossible but a president would really need to screw up bad to be guilty of it...

Not really

One of the easiest charges to draw letters of impeachment

Worked on Nixon and Clinton

 

[rightwinger]

Trump: You can't impeach me! A President can't obstruct!

 

[Rambunctious]

Not really

One of the easiest charges to draw letters of impeachment

Worked on Nixon and Clinton

I think Clinton was impeached for lying to investigators...Nixon stepped down before the shit hit the fan and needed to receive a pardon from Ford which he received...

 

[Rambunctious]

Trump: You can't impeach me! A President can't obstruct!

I don't think that is a quote....you do know that even if a president is impeached that doesn't remove him from office?

 

[Flash]

The Special Counsel is corrupted as hell with anti Trump assholes. The bastards need to be fired.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

NO, moron, the firing of Comey and the recusal by Sessions.... PROMPTED the appointment of an independent special prosecutor....a damn REPUBLICAN, no less.

Firing Comey the Clown was not obstruction of justice....everyone has said so even liberal Trump hating legal beagles on the tube...

Yeah, exercising his constitutionally granted authority is not OOJ.

Ac cording to Alan Dershowitz:

On the Fox & Friends segment, Dershowitz argued Trump had not obstructed justice—and that it was nearly impossible for a president to be guilty of obstruction short of literally destroying physical evidence. Charging Trump with obstruction of justice even though he was “exercising his constitutional authority under Article II” would actually lead to a constitutional crisis, he argued.

For obstruction of justice by the president, you need clearly illegal acts. With Nixon, hush money paid, telling people to lie, destroying evidence. Even with Clinton, they said that he tried to influence potential witnesses not to tell the truth. But there’s never been a case in history where a president has been charged with obstruction of justice for merely exercising his constitutional authority.

I hope Trump is listening that it is impossible for him to obstruct justice

It is not impossible, nobody is saying that. You need to go back and actually read the quote.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I hope Trump is listening that it is impossible for him to obstruct justice

It's not impossible but a president would really need to screw up bad to be guilty of it...

Not really

One of the easiest charges to draw letters of impeachment

Worked on Nixon and Clinton

What is a letter of impeachment?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Not really

One of the easiest charges to draw letters of impeachment

Worked on Nixon and Clinton

I think Clinton was impeached for lying to investigators...Nixon stepped down before the shit hit the fan and needed to receive a pardon from Ford which he received...

Clinton wasn't impeached.