RollingThunder
Gold Member
- Mar 22, 2010
- 4,818
- 522
- 155
Oh boy.....the retard brigade brings up the big guns.....still hoping to get me to laugh myself to death.....LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL......nice try......
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I suggest you return skooks post to the way it was before you get banned again for being a total jackass. Again.
I must say I do find it amusing how you asshats ALL seem to be ethically challenged and will resort to all sorts of scurillous behavior in a pathetic attempt to get your point accross.
Now change it back asswipe!
Meanwhile, back in reality...
2012 hottest year on record in contiguous U.S., NOAA says
Temperatures in the contiguous United States last year were the hottest in more than a century of record-keeping, shattering the mark set in 1998 by a wide margin, the federal government announced Tuesday.
2012 hottest year on record in contiguous U.S., NOAA says - Washington Post
SSDD -
Of course it is possible to go on screaming that each and every report which analyses aspects of climate change are in some way faked - and then religously triumphing any reports which even hint at the opposite as if they were impeachable gospel; but it isn't a particularly credible position.
The idea that research conducted by literally hundreds of different research units, universities and private companies is all faked - and that only you and a handful of others know about it - is of no more credibility than claiming the Hoocaust was faked by the Jews.
warmers often call sceptics 'conspiracy theorists' because we state the the records have been changed, over and over again.
will you state that, say, the contiguous USA historical temps have not significantly changed since 1998?
will you state that, say, the contiguous USA historical temps have not significantly changed since 1998?
SSDD -
Of course it is possible to go on screaming that each and every report which analyses aspects of climate change are in some way faked - and then religously triumphing any reports which even hint at the opposite as if they were impeachable gospel; but it isn't a particularly credible position.
The idea that research conducted by literally hundreds of different research units, universities and private companies is all faked - and that only you and a handful of others know about it - is of no more credibility than claiming the Hoocaust was faked by the Jews.
will you state that, say, the contiguous USA historical temps have not significantly changed since 1998?
Seriously?
I do respect you as one of the more intelligent sceptics here, Ian, which makes me wonder why you consider cherry-picking TWO years as being of any statistical value.
The fact that 2012 was the hottest year in US history, and the 9th hottest year globaly, should be enough to give even the cherry-pickers grounds for serious thought.
Sorry, I already posted a graphic in another thread showing him some of the change that has been done.
Sorry, I already posted a graphic in another thread showing him some of the change that has been done.
No, you produced the usual conspiracy theories.
The fact remains - data from any of of a half dozen major and independent sources, none of which have ever been accused of wrong doing of tampering confirms what we all know, and yet you flat out ignore their findings.
Why not admit it?
You will ignore ALL research which confirms climate change. ALL of it.
will you state that, say, the contiguous USA historical temps have not significantly changed since 1998?
Seriously?
I do respect you as one of the more intelligent sceptics here, Ian, which makes me wonder why you consider cherry-picking TWO years as being of any statistical value.
The fact that 2012 was the hottest year in US history, and the 9th hottest year globaly, should be enough to give even the cherry-pickers grounds for serious thought.
You aware that countries like Finland conduct our own research into climate, right?
So do Australia, South Africa, France, Argentina and close to a hundred other countries. Why ignore their findings?
SSDD -
Let me ask the question more directly:
Independent research conducted by Finnish and Australian research units has confirmed that climate change is influencing local conditions, and have concluded that man's role in that change is clear.
Why do you ignore this research?