Zincwarrior
Platinum Member
- Nov 18, 2021
- 17,153
- 10,430
- 1,138
They will send in the moose's.So?...lol. Are the cops going to use force?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They will send in the moose's.So?...lol. Are the cops going to use force?
Lose entry privilege, get arrested at the border and sent back broke, with no recourse of recouping what the authorities confiscated from you.
And you may want to catch up on the news. Things are getting ready to go horribly wrong for their "freedom", which is also about to get confiscated.
Not if there are banks that don't operate within the jurisdiction of the court order, if the composition of their court system is anything like ours... jurisdictional. And since it was a territorial/provincial superior court order, it could be bypassed by conducting the transactions in neighboring provinces.The ones in Canada will and do. At least legally and I guarantee that the large banking institutions will fall right in line with whatever the government up north wants them to do.
In neighboring provinces is possibly the best course of action they have right now.Not if there are banks that don't operate within the jurisdiction of the court order, if the composition of their court system is anything like ours... jurisdictional. And since it was a territorial/provincial superior court order, it could be bypassed by conducting the transactions in neighboring provinces.
"The common law provinces, including Ontario, operate under the principle of stare decisis, meaning that a decision of an appellate court is binding on future cases in the provincial superior courts of the same province."
Koch Thornton LLP - Courts System
www.ktbarristers.com
They just might. It wouldn't surprise me if they did.I wonder if they will push this nation wide?
Yup, exactly what I was talking about.They just might. It wouldn't surprise me if they did.
Meanwhile TD Bank just handed $1.4 million of the funds directly to the government.
Yup, exactly what I was talking about.
So?...lol. Are the cops going to use force?
Well, yes and no.The problem is that TD Bank is America based, and odds are that a good portion of those funds were donated by Americans.
That is theft. And GSG more than likely knew that before they made that statement about jurisdiction. True TD has a Canadian chapter, but they are an American bank that can be held liable for fraud under US law.
Fair.Well, yes and no.
What they did appears to be ahead of governmental action so I will agree it was wrong of them to do so and the convoy should push for supporters to withdraw business from the bank however where they are based is utterly irrelevant. IF they have any business whatsoever in Canada then they have a company that is entirely Canadian as well that the parent, or HQ, operates in conjunction with. All companies operate like that and this means that they are, the portion of them operating in Canada, also subject to all the same legal requirements any other Canadian company is. Hell, for banks and virtually all other businesses they even have to do this when operating in more than one state.
Since they have many branches in Canada, that section of the company would be located in Canada and even have its own cooperate leadership. In order to get the money to Canada, the US branch would need to transfer the funds to the Canada branch and at that moment it would instantly be subject to Canadian law.
So the Americans here have no legal remedy to get that money back?Well, yes and no.
What they did appears to be ahead of governmental action so I will agree it was wrong of them to do so and the convoy should push for supporters to withdraw business from the bank however where they are based is utterly irrelevant. IF they have any business whatsoever in Canada then they have a company that is entirely Canadian as well that the parent, or HQ, operates in conjunction with. All companies operate like that and this means that they are, the portion of them operating in Canada, also subject to all the same legal requirements any other Canadian company is. Hell, for banks and virtually all other businesses they even have to do this when operating in more than one state.
Since they have many branches in Canada, that section of the company would be located in Canada and even have its own cooperate leadership. In order to get the money to Canada, the US branch would need to transfer the funds to the Canada branch and at that moment it would instantly be subject to Canadian law.
That make you have wet dreams doesn’t it?Lose entry privilege, get arrested at the border and sent back broke, with no recourse of recouping what the authorities confiscated from you.
And you may want to catch up on the news. Things are getting ready to go horribly wrong for their "freedom", which is also about to get confiscated.
Technically speaking, no. At least not here. They would have to pursue it in Canada's legal system, something that is well beyond what most people can or will do.So the Americans here have no legal remedy to get that money back?
Bitcoin it appears.It will be interesting to see how they proceed.
Yes, that is what it seems like they are reaching too.Bitcoin it appears.
Yes, that is what it seems like they are reaching too.
I wonder what they can do to stop that. Bitcoin may actually get past all these laws - it is very difficult to stop digital currency. They still have control over the banks though and you MUST go through a bank somewhere to get that into something that can be spent.
Unless Canada has enough places that take bitcoin directly. I have no idea if that is something that can be done up there though. It is hard enough to spend bitcoin here as a general use currency (aka groceries, gas and the like).
That brings up something else though. The US has been exploring options to shut down digital currency for awhile. This might get the statists the final push to actually go after it in earnest. If you look at taxes, bitcoin was, to my knowledge, directly targeted by the IRS for the first time this year. I could easily be incorrect on that though, I am unsure if it has ever been mentioned specifically in previous years.
You place the rights of a corporation above those of a court?From the Post Millennial:
"Christian crowdfunding website, which is hosting the crowdfund for the Freedom Convoy truck drivers, says that it will not be following the orders of the Ontario court to freeze the crowdfund and stop the transfer of funds to the protesters."
BREAKING: GiveSendGo plans to ignore Ontario’s attempted interference and pay the truckers anyway
And there was much rejoicing!!!
Exactly.It will be interesting to see how they proceed.
They do have jurisdiction over financial institutions in Canada and they could try to stop those institutions from passing the cash onto the intended recipients. How would you get around that?
Exactly.Lose entry privilege, get arrested at the border and sent back broke, with no recourse of recouping what the authorities confiscated from you.
Possibly.And you may want to catch up on the news. Things are getting ready to go horribly wrong for their "freedom", which is also about to get confiscated.
You choose corporations over the courts?Way to give the deep state the middle finger.fuck the corrupt courts.