Given time, $200 million in the bank, and Biden's tremendous destruction of the USA, the Patriot party will prevail.

[Asclepias]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?

That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.

I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.

Detroit election ballot observers removed from room where absentee ballots are being counted - CNN Video

CNN's Miguel Marquez reports from a convention center in Detroit where some observers and challengers to the vote-counting process have been removed from a room where absentee ballots are being counted.

edition.cnn.com

Yes, there were 134 Trump observers in the room at the time of the report.

A few people (don't know which party) had been removed due to tempers flaring.

People outside who wanted to ALSO be in the room weren't allowed in because there is a legal process for that.

And?

It was two people.

There are scores of videos from election night count centres.
Show me ONE where Republican observers were close enough to watch the count going on.

Why bother? I dont care if you want to believe the people that hallucinated.

 

[Claudette]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

 

[rightwinger]

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted.

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.

The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.

Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....

Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?

Who told you one party had to stand outside? Claims aren't proof. Documentation is proof.

Because I saw them. With my own eyes. On T.V
And I read in the newspapers the Judgement of the Philladeplhia court ordering Dems to let them in.
And the next day, I read in the newspapers the Appeal made by Dems in Court who wanted to keep them out.
And after 3 days of counting, they finally gained entry but were told to keep 50 feet away.
This is all documented in court records and newspaper archives.
As I said, that alone makes the election void to most sane people.

On TV isnt with your own eyes dufus. Besides watching OAN isnt exactly reliable.

You are clearly indoctrinated.
Even CNN covered the story, and showed images of people barred, and windows covered with cardboard.
Insane stuff.

Detroit election ballot observers removed from room where absentee ballots are being counted - CNN Video

CNN's Miguel Marquez reports from a convention center in Detroit where some observers and challengers to the vote-counting process have been removed from a room where absentee ballots are being counted.

edition.cnn.com

“observers” were becoming a distraction and intimidated the poll workers.

Official observers were provided full access

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?

But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?

So why weren't the 1000 plus witnesses and whistle blowers charged with perjury.

Because its not against the law to claim you saw something and sign a piece of paper for starters.

yes, it is. Signing a false affidavit carries 5 years in prison.

Just because its incorrect doesnt make it false. You have to prove the person was willfully lying. No need to waste tax money on people that hallucinated or didnt know what they were seeing.

1000 plus people hallucinating at the same place on the same night. Incredible.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?

But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?

So why weren't the 1000 plus witnesses and whistle blowers charged with perjury.

Because its not against the law to claim you saw something and sign a piece of paper for starters.

yes, it is. Signing a false affidavit carries 5 years in prison.

Just because its incorrect doesnt make it false. You have to prove the person was willfully lying. No need to waste tax money on people that hallucinated or didnt know what they were seeing.

1000 plus people hallucinating at the same place on the same night. Incredible.

Not really. Millions of you clowns believe in Qannon so it was to be expected.

 

[rightwinger]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Even conservative judges?
That is why Trump appointed them

The “evidence” did not meet basic standards of authenticity and was quickly discarded

 

[Claudette]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

 

[Claudette]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Even conservative judges?
That is why Trump appointed them

The “evidence” did not meet basic standards of authenticity and was quickly discarded

No Judge wanted to be involved in overturning a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?

But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?

So why weren't the 1000 plus witnesses and whistle blowers charged with perjury.

Because its not against the law to claim you saw something and sign a piece of paper for starters.

yes, it is. Signing a false affidavit carries 5 years in prison.

Just because its incorrect doesnt make it false. You have to prove the person was willfully lying. No need to waste tax money on people that hallucinated or didnt know what they were seeing.

1000 plus people hallucinating at the same place on the same night. Incredible.

Not really. Millions of you clowns believe in Qannon so it was to be expected.

So, why would Dems go to court to block an audit?
Does that sound like the actions of people who are innocent, transparent and sure of their position.
Had you had an audit, this could have been put to bed in 2 days, and Biden would have 4 years of legitimacy.
Now around 50% of the population thinks he is illegitimate.
4 years of division and conflict.

 

[Claudette]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

I don't have to prove anything. The proof is all over this board. If you are that interested look for it yourself.

Trump is gone. Biden is now in the hot seat and on day one he kicked every American tax payer right in the teeth. Hell he was signing EO's and had no idea what he was signing. You'd be wise to get ready to defend his stupid ass instead of worrying about the past. LOL

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

How can a Judge prove no evidence when not one witness was scrutinised, not one Dominion machine was opened, not one CCTV image was screened.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.

I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?

Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?

But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?

So why weren't the 1000 plus witnesses and whistle blowers charged with perjury.

Because its not against the law to claim you saw something and sign a piece of paper for starters.

yes, it is. Signing a false affidavit carries 5 years in prison.

Just because its incorrect doesnt make it false. You have to prove the person was willfully lying. No need to waste tax money on people that hallucinated or didnt know what they were seeing.

1000 plus people hallucinating at the same place on the same night. Incredible.

Not really. Millions of you clowns believe in Qannon so it was to be expected.

So, why would Dems go to court to block an audit?
Does that sound like the actions of people who are innocent, transparent and sure of their position.
Had you had an audit, this could have been put to bed in 2 days, and Biden would have 4 years of legitimacy.
Now around 50% of the population thinks he is illegitimate.
4 years of division and conflict.

"So, why would Dems go to court to block an audit?"

Probably because they had done 3 audits already and didnt feel another one was necessary. Now tell me where is your evidence?

 

[Claudette]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

How can a Judge prove no evidence when not one witness was scrutinised, not one Dominion machine was opened, not one CCTV image was screened.

As I said. None of them looked at any evidence.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

I don't have to prove anything. The proof is all over this board. If you are that interested look for it yourself.

Trump is gone. Biden is now in the hot seat and on day one he kicked every American tax payer right in the teeth. Hell he was signing EO's and had no idea what he was signing. You'd be wise to get ready to defend his stupid ass instead of worrying about the past. LOL

If you want me to believe the judges Dump appointed didnt want to hear any evidence you need to provide me some proof.

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas

 

[Claudette]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

I don't have to prove anything. The proof is all over this board. If you are that interested look for it yourself.

Trump is gone. Biden is now in the hot seat and on day one he kicked every American tax payer right in the teeth. Hell he was signing EO's and had no idea what he was signing. You'd be wise to get ready to defend his stupid ass instead of worrying about the past. LOL

If you want me to believe the judges Dump appointed didnt want to hear any evidence you need to provide me some proof.

Look it up yourself if you are that interested. Its old history. Trump is gone and now you have to defend that jack ass Biden. Enjoy cause I sure will.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

I don't have to prove anything. The proof is all over this board. If you are that interested look for it yourself.

Trump is gone. Biden is now in the hot seat and on day one he kicked every American tax payer right in the teeth. Hell he was signing EO's and had no idea what he was signing. You'd be wise to get ready to defend his stupid ass instead of worrying about the past. LOL

If you want me to believe the judges Dump appointed didnt want to hear any evidence you need to provide me some proof.

Fine.
Then allow an audit first.
Your proof is in the audit (which Dems are legally blocking)

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

I don't have to prove anything. The proof is all over this board. If you are that interested look for it yourself.

Trump is gone. Biden is now in the hot seat and on day one he kicked every American tax payer right in the teeth. Hell he was signing EO's and had no idea what he was signing. You'd be wise to get ready to defend his stupid ass instead of worrying about the past. LOL

If you want me to believe the judges Dump appointed didnt want to hear any evidence you need to provide me some proof.

Look it up yourself if you are that interested. Its old history. Trump is gone and now you have to defend that jack ass Biden. Enjoy cause I sure will.

I already did look it up. Youre just repeating Qannon ideology.

 

[Asclepias]

You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.

No Judge wanted to get involved in over throwing a Presidential election. Most didn't even look at the evidence and there was plenty of it.

Prove it.

No. You prove it isn't so. Trump is gone. You'd do well to get ready to defend that Jack ass. After all you voted his stupid ass in.

The judges already proved there was no evidence. Now its up to you to provide evidence that will stand up in court.

I don't have to prove anything. The proof is all over this board. If you are that interested look for it yourself.

Trump is gone. Biden is now in the hot seat and on day one he kicked every American tax payer right in the teeth. Hell he was signing EO's and had no idea what he was signing. You'd be wise to get ready to defend his stupid ass instead of worrying about the past. LOL

If you want me to believe the judges Dump appointed didnt want to hear any evidence you need to provide me some proof.

Fine.
Then allow an audit first.
Your proof is in the audit (which Dems are legally blocking)

They already did 3 audits so my answer is no.