Given time, $200 million in the bank, and Biden's tremendous destruction of the USA, the Patriot party will prevail.

Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
In many swing states, Republicans blocked an early counting of mail in ballots.

Then they act surprised that mail in went against them
They were not surprised, they knew it was going to happen.... They planned it, just as you said.... They just pretended and acted as if they were surprised....

Slime is always slimey!
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
Who told you one party had to stand outside? Claims aren't proof. Documentation is proof.
Because I saw them. With my own eyes. On T.V
And I read in the newspapers the Judgement of the Philladeplhia court ordering Dems to let them in.
And the next day, I read in the newspapers the Appeal made by Dems in Court who wanted to keep them out.
And after 3 days of counting, they finally gained entry but were told to keep 50 feet away.
This is all documented in court records and newspaper archives.
As I said, that alone makes the election void to most sane people.
On TV isnt with your own eyes dufus. Besides watching OAN isnt exactly reliable.
You are clearly indoctrinated.
Even CNN covered the story, and showed images of people barred, and windows covered with cardboard.
Insane stuff.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
In many swing states, Republicans blocked an early counting of mail in ballots.

Then they act surprised that mail in went against them
Like in Phillie?
1.8 million postal votes sent out.
1.4 million sent back.
2.2 million counted.



" The claim that Pennsylvania recorded more mail-in votes than ballots requested is FALSE, based on our research. Numbers from the Pennsylvania Department of State show that over 2.6 million mail in ballots had been counted and over 3 million voters requested mail ballots by the Oct. 27 deadline. The false figure used in the claim originates from the number of mail in ballots requested for the Pennsylvania primary election or the number of registered Democrats that requested a mail ballot. "
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
From your own link.

" CNN's Miguel Marquez reports from a convention center in Detroit where some observers and challengers to the vote-counting process have been removed from a room where absentee ballots are being counted. "
 
You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.
Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.
I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?
Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas
Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?
But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?
So why weren't the 1000 plus witnesses and whistle blowers charged with perjury.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
Yes, there were 134 Trump observers in the room at the time of the report.

A few people (don't know which party) had been removed due to tempers flaring.

People outside who wanted to ALSO be in the room weren't allowed in because there is a legal process for that.

And?
 
All I can say is, bring it on and show us what you got since the courts who are both populated by both parties failed to see any merit in the art of argument because of weak rhetoric.

The Supreme Court turned down the Texas lawsuit because, "Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," the court wrote in an unsigned ruling Friday evening.

Trump not only lied about the election he tried to strongarm members of govt. to resign along with federal attorneys who could not produce evidence of fraud. Trump's own DOJ head said the same about no fraud and later left because of Trump's attempt to overthrow a branch the US govt., the vice president refused to do what Trump wanted over certification of the EC votes and he was threatened with death by Trumpets...

And here we are today with Trumpets claiming they are the aggrieved party when all along it is the Trumpet's who are the violators of honor, dignity and the law they claimed to champion..
 
Last edited:
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
From your own link.

" CNN's Miguel Marquez reports from a convention center in Detroit where some observers and challengers to the vote-counting process have been removed from a room where absentee ballots are being counted. "
Yeah. Your point?
 
You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.
Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.
I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?
Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas
Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?
But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?
So why weren't the 1000 plus witnesses and whistle blowers charged with perjury.
Because its not against the law to claim you saw something and sign a piece of paper for starters.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
From your own link.

" CNN's Miguel Marquez reports from a convention center in Detroit where some observers and challengers to the vote-counting process have been removed from a room where absentee ballots are being counted. "
Yeah. Your point?
This is my point.


" Timothy Kenny, the chief judge of Wayne County Circuit Court, said those making the claims "did not have a full understanding" of the vote counting process and their "interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible." "

Thats just a nice way of saying they didnt know what the fuck they were talking about. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
Yes, there were 134 Trump observers in the room at the time of the report.

A few people (don't know which party) had been removed due to tempers flaring.

People outside who wanted to ALSO be in the room weren't allowed in because there is a legal process for that.

And?
I watched the count in real time on mainstream media. There was no mention of closing due to raised tempers.
They stopped counting around 8 pm in several swing states, claiming there were burst pipes and they were "resting".
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
Yes, there were 134 Trump observers in the room at the time of the report.

A few people (don't know which party) had been removed due to tempers flaring.

People outside who wanted to ALSO be in the room weren't allowed in because there is a legal process for that.

And?
It was two people.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
Yes, there were 134 Trump observers in the room at the time of the report.

A few people (don't know which party) had been removed due to tempers flaring.

People outside who wanted to ALSO be in the room weren't allowed in because there is a legal process for that.

And?
I watched the count in real time on mainstream media. There was no mention of closing due to raised tempers.
They stopped counting around 8 pm in several swing states, claiming there were burst pipes and they were "resting".
The video you provided showed nothing.

This is why the cases were thrown out.
 
You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.
Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.
I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?
Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas
Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?
But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?
So why weren't the 1000 plus witnesses and whistle blowers charged with perjury.
Because its not against the law to claim you saw something and sign a piece of paper for starters.
yes, it is. Signing a false affidavit carries 5 years in prison.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
Yes, there were 134 Trump observers in the room at the time of the report.

A few people (don't know which party) had been removed due to tempers flaring.

People outside who wanted to ALSO be in the room weren't allowed in because there is a legal process for that.

And?
It was two people.
There are scores of videos from election night count centres.
Show me ONE where Republican observers were close enough to watch the count going on.
 
You had the chance to present evidence in court and your cases were thrown out because you had no evidence. Give it a rest. Dump lost.
Can you link to that.
I don't remember the courts saying they wouldn't hear the case due to lack of evidence.
There was a huge amount of evidence.
I did link to it. Keep reading the thread. Again if there were huge amounts of evidence why were cases being tossed due to lack of evidence?
Cases were not even initiated. Judges felt it was not within their realm to decide the next POTUS.
SCOTUS weighed up who would be the most violent based on their decision and chickened out.
Over 1000 affidavits were given and not one was interviewed by the corrupt FBI.
Incidentally, neither were they charged with perjury.
We saw the evidence with our own eyes. No need to keep up the pretence.

"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
- Judge Stephanos Bibas
Evidence is presented to court and then a decision is made if it is proof.
Voters were not given the opportunity to produce evidence.
You do know the difference between evidence and proof. Right?
But the judge plainly said there was no specific allegations let alone proof. Are you retarded or is someone paying you to pretend to be?
So why weren't the 1000 plus witnesses and whistle blowers charged with perjury.
Because its not against the law to claim you saw something and sign a piece of paper for starters.
yes, it is. Signing a false affidavit carries 5 years in prison.
Just because its incorrect doesnt make it false. You have to prove the person was willfully lying. No need to waste tax money on people that hallucinated or didnt know what they were seeing.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
Yes, there were 134 Trump observers in the room at the time of the report.

A few people (don't know which party) had been removed due to tempers flaring.

People outside who wanted to ALSO be in the room weren't allowed in because there is a legal process for that.

And?
I watched the count in real time on mainstream media. There was no mention of closing due to raised tempers.
They stopped counting around 8 pm in several swing states, claiming there were burst pipes and they were "resting".
The video you provided showed nothing.

This is why the cases were thrown out.
Then show me ONE video of a count centre in these swing states with Republicans close enough to scrutinise the ballots and signatures.
 
Well duh.....

Of course after in person votes were counted, the way the republicans were told to vote by, showed TRUMP winning after only those in person votes were counted. :lol:

The record number of absentee ballots, which are counted AFTER the in person votes, were primarily votes cast by democrats, because that way, was how they were encouraged to vote by....

It's ridiculous that anyone thinks it's odd or fraudulent because votes in the middle of the night being counted, turned out to lean heavily Biden....

It was expected to come out that way.... even talked about weeks before the election....that it would take longer to know the winner because the huge increase in absentee ballots would be processed and counted after election day results from in person voting.
The networks had been pointing this out for DAYS before the election. It was just a foregone conclusion.

The only thing I can guess is that the alternate universe networks either held it back or didn't understand it in the first place.
Trump mind control shenanigans.... He started it...his repetitive thingy that he uses on the vulnerable masses... seeded over and over again, we should have results on election night, election day will determine the winner, no one should have to wait a week or a month, for results, only in person voting should count, absentee voting is rigged, fraudulent, blah blah blah blah blah..... setting up himself, for being able to call a win for himself....before. counting the democratic voter's, votes....
Listen. There isn't a single country in the western world where one party gets to count the votes and the other party have to stand outside.
That's so clearly unfair and fraudulent that you would have to be either stupid or biased to ignore it.
Maybe Red States should block Democrat observers in 2022. Maybe they should have sole access to voting machines.
You'd be fine with that. Right?
That didn't happen. The Poll WATCHERS were inside watching the counts, 1 republican, 1 Democrat, 1 independent at every vote counting station, per State laws. The people shut out we're OBSERVERS and not official WATCHERS, who were present.

These issues went to court in suits, and were ruled on, and rectified, the same day and hour, in Court.
I've seen some of these "reports". The actual video shows people doing various fairly nondescript things, but it's the commentary provided by the "reporter" that makes the accusation. What's actually happening in the video could just as easily be perfectly benign, but they're believing what they're told is happening.

Multiply that by a few million, and you have the alternate universe. This is a real fuckin' problem.
They will never believe us, because Simon Says repetitively told them we were evil, baby killing cannibals, after we raped them first... to us, this is just whacko and :cuckoo:

The brain washing is strong with them....

Their decultifying, has to begin with someone of trust, within their ranks, who has managed to defy and break from the cult grip...is my understanding of it....
 

Forum List

Back
Top