Give a man a fish

[Mac1958]

people who hate public schools do it for only one reason.


they dont want everyone educated

Jeez, come on...

.

 

[RDD_1210]

Man, you guys hate it when people don't jump to your orders, don't you?

You can pretend my question is irrelevant, but you seem to be afraid to answer it. Why is that?

Because it's irrelevant, thats why. I'd be happy to answer it if it had something to do with what I said.

News flash, Skippy: The world doesn't revolve around you. Now you might want to consider toning down the unmerited arrogance a notch or two.

DiamondDave mentioned teaching his kids to be self-sufficient and that those on public assistance are having children they couldn't afford. You decided that was a simple concept -- probably because you can't understand it yourself -- and made your grand pronouncement.

I asked you a question based on his statement. You decided it was irrelevant, which is absolutely ludicrous.

You don't want to answer the question? Fine. But don't sit there and expect others to dance to your tune, kid. You suffer a serious horsepower deficit to be able to pull that off.

Why don't you answer the fact that you have may or may not have looked at kiddie porn before? Because it's not relevant.

Typical leftist piece of shit.

The point that you two "special" Daves are ignoring and what my point is, is that not every person who is on public assistance has a baby. And to frame your argument like that is both simple and lazy because it ignores the large % of people who need help who aren't being "irresponsible" by continuing to have children even when they can't afford it.

His concept and your follow up question were those of a simple minded idiot, simple as that. Agreeing with you that people on public assistance can't afford to have more children would not prove anything as it ignores the point that you're only talking about a fraction of the total population.

It would be like me saying all people named Dave on this site are idiots, but not all idiots are named Dave. Get it? Of course you don't, Dave.

 

[daveman]

Because it's irrelevant, thats why. I'd be happy to answer it if it had something to do with what I said.

News flash, Skippy: The world doesn't revolve around you. Now you might want to consider toning down the unmerited arrogance a notch or two.

DiamondDave mentioned teaching his kids to be self-sufficient and that those on public assistance are having children they couldn't afford. You decided that was a simple concept -- probably because you can't understand it yourself -- and made your grand pronouncement.

I asked you a question based on his statement. You decided it was irrelevant, which is absolutely ludicrous.

You don't want to answer the question? Fine. But don't sit there and expect others to dance to your tune, kid. You suffer a serious horsepower deficit to be able to pull that off.

Why don't you answer the fact that you have may or may not have looked at kiddie porn before? Because it's not relevant.

Typical leftist piece of shit.

The point that you two "special" Daves are ignoring and what my point is, is that not every person who is on public assistance has a baby. And to frame your argument like that is both simple and lazy because it ignores the large % of people who need help who aren't being "irresponsible" by continuing to have children even when they can't afford it.

And what percentage is what, by the way? You must know what it is, since you call it large.

Or is this yet anothger grand pronouncement that we're supposed to accept merely because you say it?

His concept and your follow up question were those of a simple minded idiot, simple as that. Agreeing with you that people on public assistance can't afford to have more children would not prove anything as it ignores the point that you're only talking about a fraction of the total population.

Again: What fraction?

It would be like me saying all people named Dave on this site are idiots, but not all idiots are named Dave. Get it? Of course you don't, Dave.

Gasp. More unmerited arrogance. Are you ever going to do anything to justify it? NOTE: "Being a liberal" isn't sufficient.

 

[Gadawg73]

i believe the same thing should be true about auto insurance, but it's not, I have to pay it to drive and earn money.
my house, I hate paying insurance on a house that is not worth it, but, the banks force you to buy insurance so you can sleep before driving to work.

Pay off the house and cancel the insurance then, the banks are just protecting THEIR investment.

their investment, more like they are protecting their loan.

The money they loaned you is from their depositors.
That is their investment.

 

[Gadawg73]

So anyway this guy taught me to fish so I went to the lake to get something to eat. A game warden asked for my license and I had none, but he said it was OK because some rich guy had been out in his fifty foot boat with nets and had hauled out,not just every fish, but every living thing in the lake. When I asked it that was legal he said the boat owner had contributed to the local politicians and the politicians then passed a law saying it was OK for owners of fifty foot boats to take all the fish.

The rich guy wouldn't be fishing to eat, so the story makes no sense. The more likely story is, the poor guy gets taught to fish, but when he tries to do so, the Game Warden fines him for no license, and he's told he can't fish again until he pays for a permit required by the tax and spend lefty politicians in the county.

I am rich and eat fish all the time.