Gingrich: GOP Should Be "Party Of Yes"

[Sarah G]

Damn, I hope they don't listen to him..

Do any of the responses this thread has gotten lead you to believe they will?

I think we're ok.

Newt can be so level headed and then turn around and he's suddenly crazy again.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

LOL Love the faux "Party of Yes" title

That's NOT what Newt said, but knock yourselves out

The title comes from the National Journal. You'd know that if you were anything but a troll.

"To win in 2010 and 2012, it's not enough to say no..."


were you thinking NEWT was calling on the GOP to be the party of Maybe?


www. hotlineoncall. nationaljournal .com

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Damn, I hope they don't listen to him..

Do any of the responses this thread has gotten lead you to believe they will?

I think we're ok.

Newt can be so level headed and then turn around and he's suddenly crazy again.

When NEWT puts on his academic hat--when he channels Obama---he sounds rational. When he campaigns or speaks for the Wingnut Brigade, he leaves his education and reason at the door.

 

[uscitizen]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Gingrich: GOP Should Be "Party Of Yes"

By Reid Wilson
NEW ORLEANS, LA -- Ex-House Speaker Newt Gingrich will urge attendees at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference to offer solutions instead of simply criticizing Dem policies, his organization said in a media release this afternoon.

"To win in 2010 and 2012, it's not enough to say no to the radical agenda of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid," Gingrich said in a statement. "Tonight's speech will explain why real leadership requires Republicans to offer a compelling vision of safety, prosperity, and freedom that stands in vivid contrast to Obama's secular, socialist, machine now running Washington."

Dems have scored points by labeling the GOP the "Party of No" for a perceived lack of serious policy alternatives. And the label clearly rankles GOPers in DC, who point to a few proposals from Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and House and Senate leadership.

Meanwhile, Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is spearheading efforts to craft a new version of the Contract with America, which Gingrich used in '94 as the GOP took back the House for the first time in 40 years. Party leaders have yet to say when they will unveil their agenda, and some worry that releasing it too soon will give Dems a target as they struggle with a tough political environment.

Hotline On Call

Newt's exactly right... As he was in 94 when he made that observation the first time; which lead the US Legislature into a Conservative Majority... which lead the US from the economic calamity being suggested by the same crown that is presently suggesting even more substantially calamitous policy, INTO unprecedented prosperity.

And the Election in November is the GOP's to lose. If they play nice; as the Left will demand they must; returning to their usual pre-election calls for comity... lamenting 'the politicals of destruction' as they go about trying to destroy Conservatives; claiming that they're just tellin' the truth.

The GOP needs to go to war with the DNC... Call up the best of the best; and simply use the statements of the key players... in hundreds and hundreds of ads...

Ads which show the Brown Clown stating that the Civil Rights Movement didn't strip the US of it's Constitution protections against government power.

Ads showing Pelosi braying when asked about what Constitutional authority she was standing on to pass mandatory healthcare.

Ried explaining how bribing Legislators is just politics as usual and asking if the questioner would have preferred him to have not passed mandatory Healthcare... stating that he couldn't have done it, if he hadn't bribed those legislators.

And tie the respective Democrat seats to Pelosi, Ried and The BOY King.

Americans are aware of these things... The only question is can we get enough Americans to the polls, to overcome the number of anti-Americans who will be voting FOR that corruption; deciet and fraud.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

LOL Love the faux "Party of Yes" title

That's NOT what Newt said, but knock yourselves out

The title comes from the National Journal. You'd know that if you were anything but a troll.

"To win in 2010 and 2012, it's not enough to say no..."


were you thinking NEWT was calling on the GOP to be the party of Maybe?


www. hotlineoncall. nationaljournal .com

So you agree with me that Newt didn't say that. Bravo!

 

[Sarah G]

Do any of the responses this thread has gotten lead you to believe they will?

I think we're ok.

Newt can be so level headed and then turn around and he's suddenly crazy again.

When NEWT puts on his academic hat--when he channels Obama---he sounds rational. When he campaigns or speaks for the Wingnut Brigade, he leaves his education and reason at the door.

Skitzophrenia. I swear he can switch personalities before your eyes.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

Newt is the father of the Clinton's "Budget surpluses"

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

What I found interesting was his use of the word "secular". Our government's policies SHOULD be secular. More fear-mongering by the right and no substance, I see.

Indeed, I think he was trying to be polite... I'm sure in more of a private setting he would use the word 'atheist' to more accurately reflect the problem; and 'EVIL' when he's looking for something closer to on the nose.

 

[Oddball]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

Pretty much...And the leader of the great squishy capitulation artists, known as the "Republican Revolutionaries".

He should shut his philandering feet-of-clay weasel mouth and crawl back under the rock in Georgia, from whence he came.

 

[Sarah G]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

Newt is the father of the Clinton's "Budget surpluses"

Whatever.. Clinton dragged him along.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

nope. but I bet he'd like to take the credit.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

Newt is the father of the Clinton's "Budget surpluses"

Whatever.. Clinton dragged him along.

Newt was one of the few cons to not be hing up on Clinton's penis, but we know tghat now because it's been revealed that this family man was cheating on his second wife at the time.

 

[Oddball]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

Newt is the father of the Clinton's "Budget surpluses"

Also a myth.

The alleged "balanced budget" and mythical "surpluses" were all but inevitable, as Perot pointed out on a multitude of occasions back in '92.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Newt can be so level headed and then turn around and he's suddenly crazy again.

When NEWT puts on his academic hat--when he channels Obama---he sounds rational. When he campaigns or speaks for the Wingnut Brigade, he leaves his education and reason at the door.

Skitzophrenia. I swear he can switch personalities before your eyes.

ROFLMNA... ya just can't hide an education.

More assurances you're expected to trust, from the advocates of higher 'liR NuN'.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

Newt is the father of the Clinton's "Budget surpluses"

Also a myth.

The alleged "balanced budget" and mythical "surpluses" were all but inevitable, as Perot pointed out on a multitude of occasions back in '92.

Ahh yes... Perot. Now was that before or after he went crazy?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Isn't Newt pretty much the father of modern neocons?

Newt is the father of the Clinton's "Budget surpluses"

Also a myth.

The alleged "balanced budget" and mythical "surpluses" were all but inevitable, as Perot pointed out on a multitude of occasions back in '92.

Perot?



Sean, is that you?

---

Nothing and everything is inevitable when it comes to the economy. Actions taken brought about the economic recovery of the 90s. Your argument is sound when speaking of a recovery in the long term as in, given enough time---things will recover/balance out. Eventually the economy will rebound.

But a balanced budget and surpluses had to be planned for. Clinton gets the credit for actions taken, just as Reagan does and Obama does.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Newt is the father of the Clinton's "Budget surpluses"

Also a myth.

The alleged "balanced budget" and mythical "surpluses" were all but inevitable, as Perot pointed out on a multitude of occasions back in '92.

Ahh yes... Perot. Now was that before or after he went crazy?

Perot. Master of the Politics of the Paranoid

Chapter 1: Conspiracy Theories Everywhere
from Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From

He met at least twice with the head of the Christic Institute, a fringe outfit claiming that a conspiratorial group (the "Secret Team") runs the U.S. government even as it engages in drug trafficking and arms running.

He associated with such conspiracy theorists as James "Bo" Gritz and Roy Cohn.

He took seriously some woolly charges (dubbed the "October Surprise") that George Bush in 1980 had gone to Europe to try to stop the release of American hostages in Tehran, and thereby to hurt Jimmy Carter's electoral chances.

Perot went so far as to dispatch a team to the Missouri state prison to investigate a jailbird's claim about flying Bush home in a supersonic plane from a phantom meeting in Madrid with Iranians.

Perot sees a conspiracy of neglect on the part of the U.S. government, and Bush specifically, toward captured American military men in Southeast Asia; officials shy away from this issue to hide their long-established and deeply corrupt relations with drug traffickers.

Perot's rage against these conspirators, an in-depth analysis concluded, was "at the heart, if not the very soul, of his bid for the presidency" in 1992.

Conspiracy Theories Everywhere - Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From - by Daniel Pipes

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Newt is the father of the Clinton's "Budget surpluses"

Also a myth.

The alleged "balanced budget" and mythical "surpluses" were all but inevitable, as Perot pointed out on a multitude of occasions back in '92.

Perot?



Sean, is that you?

---

Nothing and everything is inevitable when it comes to the economy. Actions taken brought about the economic recovery of the 90s. Your argument is sound when speaking of a recovery in the long term as in, given enough time---things will recover/balance out. Eventually the economy will rebound.

But a balanced budget and surpluses had to be planned for. Clinton gets the credit for actions taken, just as Reagan does and Obama does.

Indeed... Clinton is credited with recognizing that he had little choice BUt to sign the BBA... passed by the Conservative Legislative Majority or lose the 96 election.

And The Brown Clown is credited with running up deficits which are orders of maginitude larger than any other Chief Executive in world history; and forcing legislation which is designed to nationalize 1/7th of the US Economy; damaging US Contract Law, nationalizing the US Autmobile Industry; and trying to bypass the US Constitution in his attempt to 'fundamentally change America'.

Reagan of course is an Island unto himself; being the last truly American Chief Executive... Circumnavigating radical Leftist Policy which forbid the Executive from fighting Communist insugencies in Central America... Cutting the marginal tax rates; slashing regulations... setting up the longest period of prosperity known to human history. Which only came to an end, when GW failed to suppress the Left's drive to destroy the US Financial System.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Indeed... Clinton is credited with recognizing that he had little choice BUt to sign the BBA... passed by the Conservative Legislative Majority or lose the 96 election.

And The Brown Clown is credited with..


...

huh?

good bye