JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,522
- 2,165
- Banned
- #81
We have the numbers that show the Party of No will not win in 2010 unless it changes to a Party of Ideas: 52 to 46%.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This page alone should encourage the thinking American to realize the wing nut reactionaries far, far to the right offer nothing constructive for the future of America.
Nuff said.
Since Newt thinks the GOP SHOULD be the party of Yes. What are they now?
Do we have any numbers on how many blacks are completely screwed since Obama? Or any numbers to show the reduction of the middle class, or increase of those in poverty since Obama took office? I would like to put his Presidency in focus, besides all of his massive corruption and arrogance.
Since Newt thinks the GOP SHOULD be the party of Yes. What are they now?
Since Newt thinks the GOP SHOULD be the party of Yes. What are they now?
Oh that's easy, where the question is "Can we fundamentally transform the US by dismissing the US Constitution and the immutable principles on which America was founded..." the GOP is the Party of:
"HELL NO!"
And frankly, we're pretty proud of that.
The problem isn't the reponse, which is what the Left wants to isolate the problem as... the problem is THE QUESTION...
The GOP if FOR returning America to the sound sustainable principle of her origins... requiring people to learn to live within THEIR MEANS... and not the means of 'The Ethereal Rich'.
The GOP is for recognizing the certain, self-evident, unalienable individual rights endowed to them by their Creator; and the individual reponsibilities intrinsic in those rights... Right and Responsibility which rest at the core of American Exceptionalism...
The GOP is for making it emphatically clear, that if you're looking for someone else to subsidize your existence; you're failing to recognize and respect those individual responsibilities; and in the process you forfeit the rights which those responsibilities sustain; and any means to so much as THINK of yourself as an American.
Need anything else?
WASHINGTON -- President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.
On May 5, 2004, Baird found "Terri's Law" unconstitutional, and struck it down.[45] Bush appealed this order to the Second District Court of Appeals, but, on May 12, they issued an "Order Relinquishing Case for Entry of Final Judgment and Order to Show Cause Why this Proceeding Should Not be Certified to the Supreme Court As Requiring Immediate Resolution."[46] The Second District Court of Appeals, in sending it directly to the Florida's Supreme Court, invoked "pass through" jurisdiction.[47]
The Florida Supreme Court then overturned the law as unconstitutional.[48]
.
Oh, so now if a law gets struck down it means whoever proposed it is against the constitution?
Hack.
Oh, so now if a law gets struck down it means whoever proposed it is against the constitution?
Hack.
did you check with FOX News before you made this statement?
Since Newt thinks the GOP SHOULD be the party of Yes. What are they now?
Oh that's easy, where the question is "Can we fundamentally transform the US by dismissing the US Constitution and the immutable principles on which America was founded..." the GOP is the Party of:
"HELL NO!"
And frankly, we're pretty proud of that.
The problem isn't the reponse, which is what the Left wants to isolate the problem as... the problem is THE QUESTION...
The GOP if FOR returning America to the sound sustainable principle of her origins... requiring people to learn to live within THEIR MEANS... and not the means of 'The Ethereal Rich'.
The GOP is for recognizing the certain, self-evident, unalienable individual rights endowed to them by their Creator; and the individual reponsibilities intrinsic in those rights... Right and Responsibility which rest at the core of American Exceptionalism...
The GOP is for making it emphatically clear, that if you're looking for someone else to subsidize your existence; you're failing to recognize and respect those individual responsibilities; and in the process you forfeit the rights which those responsibilities sustain; and any means to so much as THINK of yourself as an American.
Need anything else?
Do you mean the GOP that gave us the Patriot Act (Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and Federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional.)
or the GOP that gave us:
WASHINGTON -- President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.
or this:
On May 5, 2004, Baird found "Terri's Law" unconstitutional, and struck it down.[45] Bush appealed this order to the Second District Court of Appeals, but, on May 12, they issued an "Order Relinquishing Case for Entry of Final Judgment and Order to Show Cause Why this Proceeding Should Not be Certified to the Supreme Court As Requiring Immediate Resolution."[46] The Second District Court of Appeals, in sending it directly to the Florida's Supreme Court, invoked "pass through" jurisdiction.[47]
The Florida Supreme Court then overturned the law as unconstitutional.[48]
.
Seems to me, if you're looking to the GOP to tell you what is or is not constitutional, you need a new source of help. And you guys seem to have really short memories!!
LOL Love the faux "Party of Yes" title
That's NOT what Newt said, but knock yourselves out
CrusaderFrank has no hesitation to lie in defense of his crusade for the wing nut right.