Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why do you need that when you have all those little tinfoil hats?WINNING!!
How great is this?
Now climate change app for skeptics of the skeptics!!
https://skepticalscience.com/software.shtml
Goes to show how much climate skepticism has grown over the past decade!!
ANY person with an 8th grade science education can discredit AGW.
You are not a climate scientist. You can analyze things but you lack the depth of knowledge that an actual climate scientist has. You are more ignorant than you realize.
No, I'm properly characterizing your entire argument, which boils down to both appeal to authority and appeal to your own ignorance.absolutely infallible authorities.
Are you intentionally arguing in bad faith or is it a product of your cognitive dissonance?
You're not a climate scientist either.
No, I'm properly characterizing your entire argument, which boils down to both appeal to authority and appeal to your own ignorance.
Logical fallacies are called that because they are illogical...You are illogical and know fucking nothing.No, I'm properly characterizing your entire argument, which boils down to both appeal to authority and appeal to your own ignorance.
Appealing to authority is the logical thing to do in this situation. You overestimate yourself, a lot.
Logical fallacies are called that because they are illogical...You are illogical and know fucking nothing.No, I'm properly characterizing your entire argument, which boils down to both appeal to authority and appeal to your own ignorance.
Appealing to authority is the logical thing to do in this situation. You overestimate yourself, a lot.
naw it'sANY person with an 8th grade science education can discredit AGW.
what we know is that the temperature of 280ppm of CO2 is the same as 411ppm of it. No one knows what that temp is, but it isn't any different. Technically they can't wipe their own asses with their own statement. I challenge each and every warmer to show me the temperature difference between 280 and 411ppm of CO2. no one ever accepts that challenge. That should tell everyone something.Logical fallacies are called that because they are illogical...You are illogical and know fucking nothing.No, I'm properly characterizing your entire argument, which boils down to both appeal to authority and appeal to your own ignorance.
Appealing to authority is the logical thing to do in this situation. You overestimate yourself, a lot.
We think very differently than these people. Most people have no clue that there is a distinct difference between intelligence and thought processing. There are many hugely intelligent ckimate crusaders in here....but most have issues in the area of thought processing. They cant think on the margin like we do. We are able to factor costs into the debate....the necessary tradeoffs. We ferret out the idealism....they cant. It's a thinking pathology. It's not a negative....just a reality. It's my field so I have a different perspective on the whole landscape of these debates.
It is fascinating to me that these people can take bows in front of banners and truly believe they are winning. Symbolic stuff is real important to them....to our way of thinking, symbolic stuff is irrelevant.
what we know is that the temperature of 280ppm of CO2 is the same as 411ppm of it. No one knows what that temp is, but it isn't any different. Technically they can't wipe their own asses with their own statement. I challenge each and every warmer to show me the temperature difference between 280 and 411ppm of CO2. no one ever accepts that challenge. That should tell everyone something.Logical fallacies are called that because they are illogical...You are illogical and know fucking nothing.No, I'm properly characterizing your entire argument, which boils down to both appeal to authority and appeal to your own ignorance.
Appealing to authority is the logical thing to do in this situation. You overestimate yourself, a lot.
We think very differently than these people. Most people have no clue that there is a distinct difference between intelligence and thought processing. There are many hugely intelligent ckimate crusaders in here....but most have issues in the area of thought processing. They cant think on the margin like we do. We are able to factor costs into the debate....the necessary tradeoffs. We ferret out the idealism....they cant. It's a thinking pathology. It's not a negative....just a reality. It's my field so I have a different perspective on the whole landscape of these debates.
It is fascinating to me that these people can take bows in front of banners and truly believe they are winning. Symbolic stuff is real important to them....to our way of thinking, symbolic stuff is irrelevant.
well sure, did you read it? I didn't realize english was an issue for you.what we know is that the temperature of 280ppm of CO2 is the same as 411ppm of it. No one knows what that temp is, but it isn't any different. Technically they can't wipe their own asses with their own statement. I challenge each and every warmer to show me the temperature difference between 280 and 411ppm of CO2. no one ever accepts that challenge. That should tell everyone something.Logical fallacies are called that because they are illogical...You are illogical and know fucking nothing.No, I'm properly characterizing your entire argument, which boils down to both appeal to authority and appeal to your own ignorance.
Appealing to authority is the logical thing to do in this situation. You overestimate yourself, a lot.
We think very differently than these people. Most people have no clue that there is a distinct difference between intelligence and thought processing. There are many hugely intelligent ckimate crusaders in here....but most have issues in the area of thought processing. They cant think on the margin like we do. We are able to factor costs into the debate....the necessary tradeoffs. We ferret out the idealism....they cant. It's a thinking pathology. It's not a negative....just a reality. It's my field so I have a different perspective on the whole landscape of these debates.
It is fascinating to me that these people can take bows in front of banners and truly believe they are winning. Symbolic stuff is real important to them....to our way of thinking, symbolic stuff is irrelevant.
what we know is that the temperature of 280ppm of CO2 is the same as 411ppm of it.
Is that supposed to make sense somehow?
Only Positive Feedback Is From How Accurately the Demeaning Indoctrination Is RecitedAgain.....why would people need an app if climate skeptics are such flat earthers?
No common sense surrounding that at all! When I first saw this, automatically figured it was an app for skeptics to identify all this fakery in AGW. Was stunned it was an app for climate crusaders!
It provides them with a steady supply of talking points....it effectively turns them into parrots who can't think for themselves...they now have an app for that.
You're not a climate scientist either.
You're right. We should listen to the people that are because they know a lot more about this than we do.
No, I'm properly characterizing your entire argument, which boils down to both appeal to authority and appeal to your own ignorance.
Appealing to authority is the logical thing to do in this situation. You overestimate yourself, a lot.
You're not a climate scientist either.
You're right. We should listen to the people that are because they know a lot more about this than we do.
Don't include me in your we...I am perfectly capable of understanding the science and am perfectly capable of separating science from pseudoscience.
You may think ignorance is a badge of honor and be perfectly happy to remain in that state...I, on the other hand never was...
Only if the authority can actually produce the evidence necessary to back up their claims
You're not a climate scientist either.
You're right. We should listen to the people that are because they know a lot more about this than we do.
Don't include me in your we...I am perfectly capable of understanding the science and am perfectly capable of separating science from pseudoscience.
You may think ignorance is a badge of honor and be perfectly happy to remain in that state...I, on the other hand never was...
You think you're as knowledgeable as a climate scientist?
I have asked before...what courses did I not take that would disqualify me from analyzing the literature and making a determination...
Only if the authority can actually produce the evidence necessary to back up their claims
They believe they've done that; you think they haven't. I'll appeal to the authority of scientists when it comes to how science works.
