So you can not name the republican you will vote for president!
Thus proving you will vote for Hilary no matter what you say here!
And thus proving you are a far left drone
This sock smells really bad!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Geriatric USMB Dem females losing it over Dem Primary
- Thread starter Dot Com
- Start date
So you can not name the republican you will vote for president!
Thus proving you will vote for Hilary no matter what you say here!
And thus proving you are a far left drone
This sock smells really bad!
The OP is sexist.
Finally a woman has a real chance to be president, and he throws the chance under the bus in favor of an old white male.
Finally a woman has a real chance to be president, and he throws the chance under the bus in favor of an old white male.
NoTeaPartyPleez
Gold Member
- Dec 2, 2012
- 11,826
- 1,912
- 245
lol
I have that tard on ignore so I didn't see it.
Yes because we know that the far left hates freedom of speech!
You left out "drone", Polly-Wanna-Cracker. Squawk!!!!
Yes you are far left drone that will vote for Hilary as you are commanded to do so!
It is so cute to watch these drones believe that they have a choice in their nominations!lol
I have that tard on ignore so I didn't see it.
Yes because we know that the far left hates freedom of speech!
You left out "drone", Polly-Wanna-Cracker. Squawk!!!!
Yes you are far left drone that will vote for Hilary as you are commanded to do so!
It is so cute to watch these drones believe that they have a choice in their nominations!
If you were really paying attention and not just parroting you would know that I have posted just as many negative posts about Hillary as anyone on the right. You're the drone here, you're just too stupid to realize it
I've got that idiot on ignore too.
Good idea. Calling her a parrot is an insult to parrots.
Dot Com
Nullius in verba
- Thread starter
- #44
says the n00b. If you want to insult me, get in lineeveryone in the US isn't on this forum.Not even a fraction of a %Most all the female Millennials are going for Bernie because they know the two-parties are corrupt to the core,
Whats your take on the situation. You NOT get screwed by them HappyJoy ? Lucky you.
I'm more than happy to have either one of them in the White house, beats the Republicans and yes there is a difference between the parties. Electibility is what I'm looking to most. I think Sanders hasn't made the case as to how he is going to pay for everything and he won't have the power to break up the banks, that's a pipe dream, nice thought though.
I'm also concerned about Sanders on foreign policy. It seems to completely revolve around voting correctly one time in 2003, other than that he doesn't seem to have much interest in the topic.
So, I can understand being impassioned about him, but to the point where you are getting close to turning off potential voters is probably not wise. Sanders can't win without "geriatric dem females", why piss them off?
You're only one Sanders supporter. They are quickly getting a reputation for being annoying assholes.
Meanwhile Hillary takes money from Las Vegas East and gives paid speeches for them:
113414_600 by david_m_22046, on Flickr
n00b? Why would I care about length of time on this board as though that is a measure of anything?
What I do see is someone who loves to dish it out but can't take any criticism.
I could've used the term- old bags but thought I would take the high road.
As to the OP, this election is too important to let a corrupt Washington-insider BACK into the WH.
She had her turn
NoTeaPartyPleez
Gold Member
- Dec 2, 2012
- 11,826
- 1,912
- 245
You left out "drone", Polly-Wanna-Cracker. Squawk!!!!
Yes you are far left drone that will vote for Hilary as you are commanded to do so!
It is so cute to watch these drones believe that they have a choice in their nominations!You left out "drone", Polly-Wanna-Cracker. Squawk!!!!
Yes you are far left drone that will vote for Hilary as you are commanded to do so!
It is so cute to watch these drones believe that they have a choice in their nominations!
If you were really paying attention and not just parroting you would know that I have posted just as many negative posts about Hillary as anyone on the right. You're the drone here, you're just too stupid to realize it
So you can not name the republican you will vote for president!
Thus proving you will vote for Hilary no matter what you say here!
And thus proving you are a far left drone!
You have gone from squawking to babbling.
So you can not name the republican you will vote for president!
Thus proving you will vote for Hilary no matter what you say here!
And thus proving you are a far left drone
This sock smells really bad!
You're just now noticing you have a sock over your head......
Yes because we know that the far left hates freedom of speech!
You left out "drone", Polly-Wanna-Cracker. Squawk!!!!
Yes you are far left drone that will vote for Hilary as you are commanded to do so!
It is so cute to watch these drones believe that they have a choice in their nominations!Yes because we know that the far left hates freedom of speech!
You left out "drone", Polly-Wanna-Cracker. Squawk!!!!
Yes you are far left drone that will vote for Hilary as you are commanded to do so!
It is so cute to watch these drones believe that they have a choice in their nominations!
If you were really paying attention and not just parroting you would know that I have posted just as many negative posts about Hillary as anyone on the right. You're the drone here, you're just too stupid to realize it
I've got that idiot on ignore too.
Good idea. Calling her a parrot is an insult to parrots.
Poor far left done!
Must be sad to have only one choice for your nomination, an old white person!
Dot Com
Nullius in verba
- Thread starter
- #47
are you a female, Hillary supporter?The OP is sexist.
Finally a woman has a real chance to be president, and he throws the chance under the bus in favor of an old white male.
I'm against her because she's a bought-and-paid-for, shill. Look at who is funding her and who she OK'd to sell weapons to while she was in the State Dept.
Yes you are far left drone that will vote for Hilary as you are commanded to do so!
It is so cute to watch these drones believe that they have a choice in their nominations!Yes you are far left drone that will vote for Hilary as you are commanded to do so!
It is so cute to watch these drones believe that they have a choice in their nominations!
If you were really paying attention and not just parroting you would know that I have posted just as many negative posts about Hillary as anyone on the right. You're the drone here, you're just too stupid to realize it
So you can not name the republican you will vote for president!
Thus proving you will vote for Hilary no matter what you say here!
And thus proving you are a far left drone!
You have gone from squawking to babbling.
So you can not name the republican you will vote for president!
Thus proving you will vote for Hilary no matter what you say here!
And thus proving you are a far left drone
This sock smells really bad!
You're just now noticing you have a sock over your head......
You smell just as bad is that far left drone Toro!
are you a female, Hillary supporter?The OP is sexist.
Finally a woman has a real chance to be president, and he throws the chance under the bus in favor of an old white male.
The far left drones do not support anything but the far left religious scriptures not rooted in reality!
NoTeaPartyPleez
Gold Member
- Dec 2, 2012
- 11,826
- 1,912
- 245
says the n00b. If you want to insult me, get in lineeveryone in the US isn't on this forum.Not even a fraction of a %I'm more than happy to have either one of them in the White house, beats the Republicans and yes there is a difference between the parties. Electibility is what I'm looking to most. I think Sanders hasn't made the case as to how he is going to pay for everything and he won't have the power to break up the banks, that's a pipe dream, nice thought though.
I'm also concerned about Sanders on foreign policy. It seems to completely revolve around voting correctly one time in 2003, other than that he doesn't seem to have much interest in the topic.
So, I can understand being impassioned about him, but to the point where you are getting close to turning off potential voters is probably not wise. Sanders can't win without "geriatric dem females", why piss them off?
You're only one Sanders supporter. They are quickly getting a reputation for being annoying assholes.
Meanwhile Hillary takes money from Las Vegas East and gives paid speeches for them:
n00b? Why would I care about length of time on this board as though that is a measure of anything?
What I do see is someone who loves to dish it out but can't take any criticism.
I could've used the term- old bags but thought I would take the high road.
As to the OP, this election is too important to let a corrupt Washington-insider BACK into the WH.
She had her turn
The Bushes and the Clintons need to go home and leave this country alone. We are not about dynasties or lineage.
NoTeaPartyPleez
Gold Member
- Dec 2, 2012
- 11,826
- 1,912
- 245
are you a female, Hillary supporter?The OP is sexist.
Finally a woman has a real chance to be president, and he throws the chance under the bus in favor of an old white male.
The far left drones do not support anything but the far left religious scriptures not rooted in reality!
Parrot-head: Ah.....clicking on that ignore button next to your screen name turns this board into a veritable Zen retreat for me.
are you a female, Hillary supporter?The OP is sexist.
Finally a woman has a real chance to be president, and he throws the chance under the bus in favor of an old white male.
The far left drones do not support anything but the far left religious scriptures not rooted in reality!
Parrot-head: Ah.....clicking on that ignore button next to your screen name turns this board into a veritable Zen retreat for me.
Another far left drone proving they can not handle freedom of speech!
Dumpcraps have always been screwed up.
Clinton is corrupt as the day is long ladies. Arms sales to countries that don't allow women to drive cars or go outdoors by themselves.
People like most all the left wing females on the board. Shame on you!!! Time to check that Establ privilege at the door>>snip<<
Can't shame whores. Can't do it.
If you could, the dimocrap scum party would have died with JFK. He was the last Democrat. Everything and everybody from that criminal organization masquerading as a political party has been a dimocrap since then.
Including the voters...... No, Especially the voters.
Without scumbag voters, there could be no criminal organization I call the dimocrap party.
Selfish, me first, one-way motherfuckers. All of them.
Don't like it? Suck on it
They were pro-slavery. They invented Jim Crow laws.
Now they've been taken over by Communists.
If there ever was a political party that would sell America out.......it's the Demogoge Party
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
- 1,140
- Banned
- #54
says the n00b. If you want to insult me, get in lineeveryone in the US isn't on this forum.Not even a fraction of a %
You're only one Sanders supporter. They are quickly getting a reputation for being annoying assholes.
Meanwhile Hillary takes money from Las Vegas East and gives paid speeches for them:
n00b? Why would I care about length of time on this board as though that is a measure of anything?
What I do see is someone who loves to dish it out but can't take any criticism.
I could've used the term- old bags but thought I would take the high road.
As to the OP, this election is too important to let a corrupt Washington-insider BACK into the WH.
She had her turn
The Bushes and the Clintons need to go home and leave this country alone. We are not about dynasties or lineage.
I agree with the sentiment but we have had quite a few dynasties. Roosevelts , Adams, Kennedys, not to mention state and local governments. I doubt many liberals had a problem with Robert or Teddy running for president.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,023
- 47,212
- 2,180
JIllian, for one.ummmmm..... read the post TWO POSTS PRIOR TO YOURSGeriatric USMB Dem females losing it over Dem Primary
Who are those "geriatric USMB Dem females"?
Who is losing it exactly?
NoTeaPartyPleez
Gold Member
- Dec 2, 2012
- 11,826
- 1,912
- 245
says the n00b. If you want to insult me, get in lineYou're only one Sanders supporter. They are quickly getting a reputation for being annoying assholes.
Meanwhile Hillary takes money from Las Vegas East and gives paid speeches for them:
n00b? Why would I care about length of time on this board as though that is a measure of anything?
What I do see is someone who loves to dish it out but can't take any criticism.
I could've used the term- old bags but thought I would take the high road.
As to the OP, this election is too important to let a corrupt Washington-insider BACK into the WH.
She had her turn
The Bushes and the Clintons need to go home and leave this country alone. We are not about dynasties or lineage.
I agree with the sentiment but we have had quite a few dynasties. Roosevelts , Adams, Kennedys, not to mention state and local governments. I doubt many liberals had a problem with Robert or Teddy running for president.
We had slavery, children laboring in factories and women could not vote or own property either. Too bad the term "progressive" has become sullied. But I still am one.
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
- 1,140
- Banned
- #58
says the n00b. If you want to insult me, get in line
Meanwhile Hillary takes money from Las Vegas East and gives paid speeches for them:
n00b? Why would I care about length of time on this board as though that is a measure of anything?
What I do see is someone who loves to dish it out but can't take any criticism.
I could've used the term- old bags but thought I would take the high road.
As to the OP, this election is too important to let a corrupt Washington-insider BACK into the WH.
She had her turn
The Bushes and the Clintons need to go home and leave this country alone. We are not about dynasties or lineage.
I agree with the sentiment but we have had quite a few dynasties. Roosevelts , Adams, Kennedys, not to mention state and local governments. I doubt many liberals had a problem with Robert or Teddy running for president.
We had slavery, children laboring in factories and women could not vote or own property either. Too bad the term "progressive" has become sullied. But I still am one.
So, you wouldn't have voted for Robert Kennedy if you had the chance?
EDIT: To be clear, I'm not comparing Hillary to Bobby, just that I think dynasties are an argument of convenience.
SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
- 280
- Banned
- #60
I also noticed that abortion would have saved us from all the intrusive government anti-choice morons.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Replies
- 40
- Views
- 5K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 111
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 24
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 110
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8082
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-