Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Perfect example of the far left mentality..
History of Iraq started in 2003 and caused 9/11..
Caused 9/11? Really?
Based on the far left drone logic you displayed in your propaganda laced religious propaganda!
You're a bit too hooked on far left mythology. What propaganda laced religious propaganda (on second thought, you're a bit too hooked on propaganda too) are you talking about?
So yes according to your far left mentality, you are howing why the far left religion is the most dangerous religion on the planet.
We seem to have a failure of communication. Hellooooo....anyone home in there? Can you be more specific...something besides meaningless cliches?
See the far left sees Islam vs Christians as starting on January 1, 2001. Yet based on their own revision of history the beginning of the Iraq history starts in 2003, which led to 9/11 and now it is GWB who is responsible for all decision being made after January 1, 2009.
Ah....I think I see the problem.
Correction: the far left does not see this as a "religious war" at all.
Correction 2: GWB is responsible for the decision to invade Iraq which led to destabilization in the entire region into sectarian fighting, and a huge growth in exremist militias. In addition, his actions led to a strengthening of Iran now that it no longer had Iraq as a counter-balance.
Now do you understand?
Yet showing the far left drone mentality..
You really need to get off this drone shit. It's bad for your health.
Well if Dubya dislikes his mid-east policies, then they can't be too bad
Ironic how W and Obama don't like each others middle east policies when they have the same middle east policies
Obama opposed invading Iraq, idiot.
Caused 9/11? Really?
Based on the far left drone logic you displayed in your propaganda laced religious propaganda!
You're a bit too hooked on far left mythology. What propaganda laced religious propaganda (on second thought, you're a bit too hooked on propaganda too) are you talking about?
So yes according to your far left mentality, you are howing why the far left religion is the most dangerous religion on the planet.
We seem to have a failure of communication. Hellooooo....anyone home in there? Can you be more specific...something besides meaningless cliches?
See the far left sees Islam vs Christians as starting on January 1, 2001. Yet based on their own revision of history the beginning of the Iraq history starts in 2003, which led to 9/11 and now it is GWB who is responsible for all decision being made after January 1, 2009.
Ah....I think I see the problem.
Correction: the far left does not see this as a "religious war" at all.
Correction 2: GWB is responsible for the decision to invade Iraq which led to destabilization in the entire region into sectarian fighting, and a huge growth in exremist militias. In addition, his actions led to a strengthening of Iran now that it no longer had Iraq as a counter-balance.
Now do you understand?
Yet showing the far left drone mentality..
You really need to get off this drone shit. It's bad for your health.
Yes it gets proven that the far left drones attacks were indeed duds and they want to deny it.
You would think based on the original comments made by this drone that GWB was still president..
The far left religious "dogma" has been shown and proven with every post you make.
So you trusted Saddam over GWB and Clinton?
Based on the far left drone logic you displayed in your propaganda laced religious propaganda!
You're a bit too hooked on far left mythology. What propaganda laced religious propaganda (on second thought, you're a bit too hooked on propaganda too) are you talking about?
So yes according to your far left mentality, you are howing why the far left religion is the most dangerous religion on the planet.
We seem to have a failure of communication. Hellooooo....anyone home in there? Can you be more specific...something besides meaningless cliches?
See the far left sees Islam vs Christians as starting on January 1, 2001. Yet based on their own revision of history the beginning of the Iraq history starts in 2003, which led to 9/11 and now it is GWB who is responsible for all decision being made after January 1, 2009.
Ah....I think I see the problem.
Correction: the far left does not see this as a "religious war" at all.
Correction 2: GWB is responsible for the decision to invade Iraq which led to destabilization in the entire region into sectarian fighting, and a huge growth in exremist militias. In addition, his actions led to a strengthening of Iran now that it no longer had Iraq as a counter-balance.
Now do you understand?
Yet showing the far left drone mentality..
You really need to get off this drone shit. It's bad for your health.
Yes it gets proven that the far left drones attacks were indeed duds and they want to deny it.
You would think based on the original comments made by this drone that GWB was still president..
The far left religious "dogma" has been shown and proven with every post you make.
So you trusted Saddam over GWB and Clinton?
Ok. Only the last line makes coherent sense so we'll start there. It has nothing to do with "trust".
Just more supply side economics from the Right.
Your liar in chief ended the Iraq war successfully, and I'm sure you were polishing his knob while he was taking credit. Now it's a disaster, because Obama is an idiot."George W. Bush Bashes Obama on Middle East"
Given the fact GWB started two failed, illegal wars in the region, he's in no position to 'bash' any president concerning the ME.
He's come down with an acute case of Cheneyism.
Be assured, the neocons will be trying to rewrite the history of Iraq from now until every one of them is dead.
I always chuckle when leftists blame Dubya for taking out Saddam when they all said it had to be done but not one of them had the stones to do it:
Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Well said. It's all absolute truth. But Relativists are incapable of recognizing the truth. It's the same evil that precluded the Jews from resigning Christ as God incarnate.
They're evil and they act as one should reasonably expect evil to act.
Now you are saying Jews are evil?
Obama opposed invading Iraq, idiot.
Barry is a chickenshit ....
Logically, shouldn't Bush be advocating an invasion of Iran?
Doesn't Iran meet all the claims Bush made about Iraq when he argued that war was NECESSARY?
I always chuckle when leftists blame Dubya for taking out Saddam when they all said it had to be done but not one of them had the stones to do it:
Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Well said. It's all absolute truth. But Relativists are incapable of recognizing the truth. It's the same evil that precluded the Jews from resigning Christ as God incarnate.
They're evil and they act as one should reasonably expect evil to act.
Now you are saying Jews are evil?
What? You aren't aware of evil Jews?
ROFLMNAO! Based upon what? You've never heard of George Soros?
LOL! Count the Jews that voted for obama and you will find evil Jews to the last one.
Count the ones that lead Christ to Pilot through a bed of lies... And that is the same evil in those Jews.
We (those who possess the spirit of God) know they're evil by their inability to recognize the truth. You're no different. If you prefer the scientific diagnosis it's know as Relativism. In historic terms, you're just evil.
Any questions?
You're a bit too hooked on far left mythology. What propaganda laced religious propaganda (on second thought, you're a bit too hooked on propaganda too) are you talking about?
So yes according to your far left mentality, you are howing why the far left religion is the most dangerous religion on the planet.
We seem to have a failure of communication. Hellooooo....anyone home in there? Can you be more specific...something besides meaningless cliches?
See the far left sees Islam vs Christians as starting on January 1, 2001. Yet based on their own revision of history the beginning of the Iraq history starts in 2003, which led to 9/11 and now it is GWB who is responsible for all decision being made after January 1, 2009.
Ah....I think I see the problem.
Correction: the far left does not see this as a "religious war" at all.
Correction 2: GWB is responsible for the decision to invade Iraq which led to destabilization in the entire region into sectarian fighting, and a huge growth in exremist militias. In addition, his actions led to a strengthening of Iran now that it no longer had Iraq as a counter-balance.
Now do you understand?
Yet showing the far left drone mentality..
You really need to get off this drone shit. It's bad for your health.
Yes it gets proven that the far left drones attacks were indeed duds and they want to deny it.
You would think based on the original comments made by this drone that GWB was still president..
The far left religious "dogma" has been shown and proven with every post you make.
So you trusted Saddam over GWB and Clinton?
Ok. Only the last line makes coherent sense so we'll start there. It has nothing to do with "trust".
So this one spits out far left drone propaganda then tries to deny they are one..
Ignores Obama and his illegal wars, and his red line in the sand and his cut and run policies to appease the drones like you.
ROFLMNAO. It's such a sime equation... In intellectual terms it is the equivalent of 2+2... And even THAT is beyond you Gilligan.Your liar in chief ended the Iraq war successfully, and I'm sure you were polishing his knob while he was taking credit. Now it's a disaster, because Obama is an idiot."George W. Bush Bashes Obama on Middle East"
Given the fact GWB started two failed, illegal wars in the region, he's in no position to 'bash' any president concerning the ME.
He's come down with an acute case of Cheneyism.
Be assured, the neocons will be trying to rewrite the history of Iraq from now until every one of them is dead.
Why do you want Americans dying in Iraq in place of Iraqis?
Logically, shouldn't Bush be advocating an invasion of Iran?
Doesn't Iran meet all the claims Bush made about Iraq when he argued that war was NECESSARY?
Is Bush still president?
And he (Bush) did warm Iran about their nuclear development.
Obama doe snot care if they develop nuclear weapons as he hands Iraq over to Iran..
Just for the record, how many American military casualties in Iraq this year?
Bush decided it would be a good idea to play regime change in Iraq. A feat of ignorance and arrogance and a complete lack of the cultures and histories in play.
ROFLMNAO. It's such a sime equation... In intellectual terms it is the equivalent of 2+2... And even THAT is beyond you Gilligan.Your liar in chief ended the Iraq war successfully, and I'm sure you were polishing his knob while he was taking credit. Now it's a disaster, because Obama is an idiot."George W. Bush Bashes Obama on Middle East"
Given the fact GWB started two failed, illegal wars in the region, he's in no position to 'bash' any president concerning the ME.
He's come down with an acute case of Cheneyism.
Be assured, the neocons will be trying to rewrite the history of Iraq from now until every one of them is dead.
Why do you want Americans dying in Iraq in place of Iraqis?
