Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why won't obamaturd release his papers, and reveal where 300 mil in campaign contribution came from? Because both would embarrass him and he would prove US right, he is unqualified and socialist backed. Keep it up idiot.No it has not.
It can be "exploded" by releasing the docyuments that "prove" he wasnt in Paris.
Gee why wont they release them then????????
Why won't obamaturd release his papers, and reveal where 300 mil in campaign contribution came from? Because both would embarrass him and he would prove US right, he is unqualified and socialist backed. Keep it up idiot.No it has not.
It can be "exploded" by releasing the docyuments that "prove" he wasnt in Paris.
Gee why wont they release them then????????
What the Reagan administration did was treason.
What the Reagan administration did was treason.
What the Reagan administration did was treason.
There are witnesses who saw him in Paris that day.
There are NO witnesses to him being in DC.
These documents will reveal the truth of his whereabouts on that day.
Do you agree they should be released?
What day is that? Secret Service records establish his location on every day of the 1980 campaign. He was never in Paris.
How about obamaturd giving weapons to mexican drug cartels? He is a sitting president, impeach his sorry ass. Go away liar.Why won't obamaturd release his papers, and reveal where 300 mil in campaign contribution came from? Because both would embarrass him and he would prove US right, he is unqualified and socialist backed. Keep it up idiot.No it has not.
It can be "exploded" by releasing the docyuments that "prove" he wasnt in Paris.
Gee why wont they release them then????????
Go start a thread about it .
This thread is about papa bush and wether he nogociated with Iran to keep the hostages for a longer time.
What about clinton letting the chinese have our weapons tech. Under clinton china was able to target the U.S. for the first time. Go away.Treasonous?
Making deals with an avowed enemy of the USA when not officially empowered to do so.
Yes treason.
It appears that this is where Iran Contra started.
What the Reagan administration did was treason.
Last time I checked opposing progressive politics isn't treasonous.
Of course, selling guns to Mexican drug Lords so that they will use them against American citizens in an attempt to eliminate the Second Amendment likely is.
Is your little doggie doing your thinking for you?Keeping a Curious Bush Secret | Consortiumnews
Keeping a Curious Bush Secret
August 12, 2011
Exclusive: One of the strange mysteries from the Reagan-Bush era is where did George H.W. Bush go on one Sunday in October 1980 when some witnesses placed him meeting with Iranians in Paris. More than three decades later, Bushs supposed alibi remains a state secret, Robert Parry reports.
By Robert Parry
More than three decades ago, on Oct. 19, 1980, then-Republican vice presidential candidate George H.W. Bush supposedly took an afternoon trip to visit a family friend in Washington, an alibi that could prove he could not have traveled secretly to Paris for treacherous meetings with Iranians.
But Bushs White House in 1992 and his presidential library now have refused to release the name of this alibi witness or even the address where Bush allegedly went. The insistence on keeping this secret has just been reaffirmed by Debra Steidel Wall, deputy archivist of the United States.
So, rather than release what theoretically should be a fact the Bush Family would want out proof that the elder George Bush did not engage in secret talks with Iranians behind President Jimmy Carters back regarding 52 Americans then being held hostage in Iran the U.S. government is saying that only a costly federal court lawsuit can dislodge this historical detail.
i still don't see why the iranians would release them the day he got in to office....the deal had to have been made with the USA or the Reagan team, PRIOR to their release.....thus, jimmy carter's team worked the deal to release them, or the President elect's team got involved BEFORE Reagan was inaugurated.
There was no deal, nitwit.
If they would relaese the documents they could CLEAR papa Bush..
Why dont they?
What the Reagan administration did was treason.
You're such a Democratic party stooge. You look at all the atrocities committed by our government on a daily basis and you only care about the ones that are politically expedient. You are a slave...by choice... Turns out freedom was work. Pass...
