GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama

[Wehrwolfen]

Despite All of His Bush-Bashing… GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama

Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, January 6, 2013, 12:29 PM


It’s not news that Barack Obama likes to blame George Bush’s ‘failed policies’ for all of the problems in America today. But now we know that after four years of Barack Obama the economic growth during the Bush years was greater …

Continue reading →
Despite All of His Bush-Bashing… GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama | The Gateway Pundit

 

[Katzndogz]

We don't have any growth rate. At best it's static.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Despite All of His Bush-Bashing… GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama

Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, January 6, 2013, 12:29 PM


It’s not news that Barack Obama likes to blame George Bush’s ‘failed policies’ for all of the problems in America today. But now we know that after four years of Barack Obama the economic growth during the Bush years was greater …

Continue reading →
Despite All of His Bush-Bashing… GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama | The Gateway Pundit

Bush was handed what some say was a surplus, or at the least a very sound economy. Obama was handed the remnants of what Bush left us...an economic disaster on a scale of the great depression.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

We don't have any growth rate. At best it's static.

static is better than the free fall into economic ruin that Bush left Obama

 

[Katzndogz]

The economy Bush got was just beginning to slide into recession.

Two Huge Flaws in the Legend of the Clinton Economy

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Cons, give it up and move on. Obama was reelected. Bush sucked (he was not the devil, Cheney was LOL).

The economy was saved. We're struggling to grow. Stop looking back and comparing because when you do we get to bring up Bush and Reagan.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The economy Bush got was just beginning to slide into recession.

Two Huge Flaws in the Legend of the Clinton Economy

give it up. If anyone but Bush was handed that economy...

there was no recession when Bush took office

 

[Katzndogz]

We don't have any growth rate. At best it's static.

static is better than the free fall into economic ruin that Bush left Obama

All engineered by democrats.

 

[Katzndogz]

The economy Bush got was just beginning to slide into recession.

Two Huge Flaws in the Legend of the Clinton Economy

give it up. If anyone but Bush was handed that economy...

there was no recession when Bush took office

Because Bush took office and knew what he was doing. Democrats couldn't really crash the economy until they had control over it for two full years.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

 

[rightwinger]

Bush had five quarters of negative GDP

It's called a recession

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Bush was handed what some say was a surplus, or at the least a very sound economy. Obama was handed the remnants of what Bush left us...an economic disaster on a scale of the great depression.

It was nothing close to The Great Depression, Dainty. We didn't have 25% of the country unemployed living in Hoovervilles.

And while I'm no fan of Bush, he took over on the heals of the dot com bust and then, of course, 9-11 happened.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Which nutter is going to come here and say Bush did a good job when it comes to our economy?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Bush was handed what some say was a surplus, or at the least a very sound economy. Obama was handed the remnants of what Bush left us...an economic disaster on a scale of the great depression.

It was nothing close to The Great Depression, Dainty. We didn't have 25% of the country unemployed living in Hoovervilles.

And while I'm no fan of Bush, he took over on the heals of the dot com bust and then, of course, 9-11 happened.

Dainty? How very DrHouseGay of you

Read the headlines and predictions in 2007/2008: End of the world as we know it. We bailed out the whole financial industry in order to stave off disaster. If we had acted like conservatives did in the`1920s/1930s we would have fallen into darkness. So in effect 2008 was NOT like the Great Depression because Bush and then Obama acted like liberals in economic terms and deeds.


9/11 is an excuse for most everything Bush dud, and it was always my opinion that the WH panicked. Bush did well in the initial moments after 9/11 but then he went cuckoo-for-cocoa-puffs with 'keeping us safe' bullshit. The Congress went nuts as they always do...it's why the founders made change so tough, they knew popular demand needs a cooling off period for sanity to kick in.

The dot com bust? Bush? 9/11? Excuses.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Bush had five quarters of negative GDP

It's called a recession

say that again?

 

[Doc91678]

The economy Bush got was just beginning to slide into recession.

Two Huge Flaws in the Legend of the Clinton Economy

As I remember it, In October 2000 the economy was tanking. The stock market was in the dumps and by the time Bush was inaugurated we had the beginnings of a recession. Bush was in a bind then with the 9/11 attack America was really in the shit can.
Bush did all he could including cutting taxes for the middle-class. Democrats claimed at the time the tax cuts were only for the rich. The economy improved, our GDP grew and jobs were plentiful. Then the Democrats became the majority in both Houses and things went into the crapper again and they are still in the crapper. Thankyouverymuch Mr. Maobama...

 

[Doc91678]

The economy Bush got was just beginning to slide into recession.

Two Huge Flaws in the Legend of the Clinton Economy

give it up. If anyone but Bush was handed that economy...

there was no recession when Bush took office

On the contrary. How quickly we forget. see:

The Dot Com Bubble Burst That Caused The 2000 Stock Market Crash​

The 2000 stock market crash resulted in a loss of almost $8 trillion of wealth. So what must be the reason of the crash? As has been deduced by market experts, the corporate corruption is believed to be a major reason for the crash to occur. Lots of multinational companies had been drawing profits by engaging in illegal means and frauds. The accounts that they maintained had serious loopholes and the debts were not shown. The stock options that the officers took worked towards diluting the companies. Another probable reason for the 2000 stock market crash was the overvaluation of the stocks and the dot com bubble burst. Even the companies that had absolutely no hope of earning profits and were consistently loosing money had a market capitalization of more than a billion dollar. The stock trading was going on the P/E basis.

The increase in internet trading also led to the crash of 2000. The internet served an easy access to trading for a lot of traders who lacked the required experience. Their trial and error methods of trading lead to losses in the stock trading market. Another supposed reason is that the research firms had a conflict of interest. The investment bankers had the research firms put not so honest ratings on the stocks, thus leading to an overall loss of wealth in the market.

The stock market crash of 2000 is regarded as one of the biggest crashes in the history of stock trading, the others being in the year 1987 and 1929. All these years the markets incurred heavy losses and the reforms were introduced to once again stabilize the market and restore the losses.

Read more at:
The Dot Com Bubble Burst That Caused The 2000 Stock Market Crash | Stock Picks System

 

[uscitizen]

Despite All of His Bush-Bashing… GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama

Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, January 6, 2013, 12:29 PM


It’s not news that Barack Obama likes to blame George Bush’s ‘failed policies’ for all of the problems in America today. But now we know that after four years of Barack Obama the economic growth during the Bush years was greater …

Continue reading →
Despite All of His Bush-Bashing… GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama | The Gateway Pundit

Yep we grew great big bubbles that deflated. $4 gas helped the GDP as well.
Phoney growth.

 

[Doc91678]

Despite All of His Bush-Bashing… GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama

Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, January 6, 2013, 12:29 PM


It’s not news that Barack Obama likes to blame George Bush’s ‘failed policies’ for all of the problems in America today. But now we know that after four years of Barack Obama the economic growth during the Bush years was greater …

Continue reading →
Despite All of His Bush-Bashing… GDP Growth Was Greater During the Bush Years Than Under Obama | The Gateway Pundit

Yep we grew great big bubbles that deflated. $4 gas helped the GDP as well.
Phoney growth.

You're speaking of Maobama's $4.00+/gal gave us. notice the prices haven't fallen below $3.00/gal since he came into office. They did during Bush's tenure didn't they?

 

[francoHFW]

Gas prices fell under Booosh when the economy went in the dumper- it's called lack of demand, and fear of worse..

OP: Yeah, it was called the real estate bubble. A fraud that became a 9% retraction by the time Obama got in. You're brainwashed functional morons. Change the channel.

People who get their info from Rush, Fox, Beck are proven to get MORE uninformed LOL